Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 Oct 2000, 06:26 (Ref:41896)   #1
Vandas
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 460
Vandas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would like to know everyone's opinions on the current shift in power in Australian motorsport at the top level. which may very well spill over down the line of Australian Racing categories. Is it a good thing or a bad thing? I would really like to know where everyone stands.
Vandas is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Oct 2000, 08:08 (Ref:41910)   #2
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Wasn't all of this resolved when the FIA intervened and put an end to it out of court?

Anyways, esentially.

Cams took Avesco to Court because they had become too powerful.

Avesco took Cams to court because Cams gave them the power.

Im very anti-Avesco at the best of times, but I really can't see either being entirely right on this one. It had the potential to ruin all motorsport, including V8s. Very good it didnt happen, but sad in a way it got to that point.
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Oct 2000, 20:13 (Ref:42029)   #3
Danielsun
Veteran
 
Danielsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 876
Danielsun should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Much in the way that we love to blame Bill Gates and Microsoft for all our computer problems, we like to blame Tony Cochrane for destroying Australian motorsport if it didn't start and end with V8 Supercars...

I guess, as Crash Test has already alluded to, we don't really like what's happened and would rather not talk -- shout -- about it...
Danielsun is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Oct 2000, 00:34 (Ref:42087)   #4
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The sad thing is that there are very few motorsport fans in Australia. The majority are "V8 Hicks" (thanks David P) or the type who romp up to Surfers or Adelaide etc. Seriously, down at Indy last year i saw a heap of people that I knew, school teachers, work mates etc, and these folk aren't motorsport fans!

The thing is that if/when Avesco get their way, there will not be any races at permanant tracks, and half of the races will be held off shore. This will absolutely massacre what ever is left of Australian motorsport.

I've posted an interview with Lakeside's circuit manager on Accelerate (http://www.qrda.asn.au). He says things will be peachy, but he would want there to be more national packages. It is all well and good to say that we need mroe national packages, but they need people to attend. From the total lack of interest in Super Touring, Nascar, V8 Lites etc, it is quite obvious that Australia is not big enough to hae two major series.

With a little luck, Cochrane will take his show overseas never to be seen again, and something will come along and take its place in Australia. Meh...I'm dreaming again...
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Oct 2000, 22:42 (Ref:42649)   #5
Vandas
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 460
Vandas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I've heard.

From what I hear next season, Avesco are putting up the price to hold a V8 event by nearly 200%. Now I know that this is a move which will bring the end of V8 supercar racing in Australia. People like PIMS (Phillip Island Motor Sport) will just laugh at them and say well have fun because you can't play here any more. Now I am not an AVESCO basher. I have been in contact with the Operations Manager Tony Manson, since before the whole court case went ahead. what I want to know is if Avesco has power where does that leave CAMS and the race director of the V8 class Tim Schenken. What sort of role does he play. Will Avesco take over more of the role of running their own event? I would love to know what the master plan is. But before we kick and scream about what is going on, remember that SEL and IMG the two big companies behind Avesco made it to where they are not from exploiting everythings so quickly and offensively, but they normally nurture and grow then reap the harvest when it is at its fullest. If it was going to be a quick money grabbing campaign then I think they would have gone about it differently. I say give them a go. If they can grow motorsport in Australia then we all will win not just the top liners.
Vandas is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Oct 2000, 00:26 (Ref:42668)   #6
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
$300,000 for a round is rediculous....no track in Australia can support that. Therefore, the tracks biggest money making event no longer makes money, but they wind up making a substantial loss. So what happens to permanant circuits? Do you keep opperating no matter what the cost is?

Also have you noticed the decline in grid numbers in the last few years at State level? I've posted some stats in the back issues of Accelerate (http://www.qrda.asn.au) which are fairly grpahic. What Avesco is doing is for Avescos sake. Taking 5 races in a 13 race series off shore can't be good for Motorsport in Australia...ok, it'll be a great thing for the people of Brunei, by the way, how many Bruneian V8 Fans do you know? Obviously they have a fan base there if TC is so hell bent on going over there....

Also, have you heard the rumours that the New Zealand race is in trouble before it even started? Noticed hwo they moved the date back 8 weeks ago, and some sources in NZ are saying that financially it could be in trouble...
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Apr 2008, 13:55 (Ref:2184018)   #7
GtiMagic
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 184
GtiMagic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridGtiMagic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I find it fascinating to reflect on opinions past. I went to page 221 to find this little gem.

I want us all to imagine how many more replies such a thread would command these days compared to a total of 5 over 4 days as with this, the original. It highlights the amazing growth of V8SC in 7 1/2 years. Our levels of interest, our levels of knowledge and desires to share opinions all go towards proving that whatever Cochrane has spearheaded has worked. V8SC is one mean show!
GtiMagic is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Apr 2008, 14:01 (Ref:2184026)   #8
bludvl_x19
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Australia
umop apisdn
Posts: 1,638
bludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
While true,





Mick
bludvl_x19 is offline  
__________________
Supercars isn't the sport. The sport is motor racing.
Quote
Old 22 Apr 2008, 18:58 (Ref:2184288)   #9
Oldtony
Veteran
 
Oldtony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Australia
Gold Coast Australia
Posts: 1,723
Oldtony should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridOldtony should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridOldtony should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridOldtony should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Gee! is that how it all happened?
I thought CAMS was a wholely owned subsidiary of AVESCO/TEGA/VESA.
But then you sit back and watch while other promising series self destruct you start to understand why the Taxis control motorsport.
Oldtony is offline  
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional.
Quote
Old 22 Apr 2008, 21:46 (Ref:2184428)   #10
Trevor
Veteran
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 1,497
Trevor should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Very interesting readin and from 8 years ago.

I particulalrly like these couple of little snippets:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash Test
The thing is that if/when Avesco get their way, there will not be any races at permanant tracks, and half of the races will be held off shore. This will absolutely massacre what ever is left of Australian motorsport.


This actually happened in 2004:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vandas
From what I hear next season, Avesco are putting up the price to hold a V8 event by nearly 200%. Now I know that this is a move which will bring the end of V8 supercar racing in Australia. People like PIMS (Phillip Island Motor Sport) will just laugh at them and say well have fun because you can't play here any more.


I really like this one:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash Test
$300,000 for a round is rediculous....no track in Australia can support that. Therefore, the tracks biggest money making event no longer makes money, but they wind up making a substantial loss. So what happens to permanant circuits? Do you keep opperating no matter what the cost is?
Try doubling that fee these days, and the rest is true as well. Lakeside gone (and now back in a smaller way)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash Test
Also have you noticed the decline in grid numbers in the last few years at State level? ..... Taking 5 races in a 13 race series off shore can't be good for Motorsport in Australia...ok,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash Test
Also, have you heard the rumours that the New Zealand race is in trouble before it even started?
Well, that has come to fruition in part




What a laugh.
Trevor is offline  
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
Quote
Old 22 Apr 2008, 22:07 (Ref:2184443)   #11
PVDA
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Australia
Melbourne
Posts: 3,011
PVDA should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridPVDA should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridPVDA should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Especially when you consider that Vandas went on to become a full time employee of CAMS and disappeared from the forums forever.
PVDA is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Apr 2008, 22:41 (Ref:2184468)   #12
NewsStalker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,063
NewsStalker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well not quite - he still had his finger in the forum for a while while he was employed - but someone got caught fiddling with posts - didn't they?

What was that name - Dr Nah Nah something or other?
NewsStalker is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Apr 2008, 23:33 (Ref:2184494)   #13
Uncle Cranker
Veteran
 
Uncle Cranker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Australia
Victoria; Australia
Posts: 1,042
Uncle Cranker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Dr Nether-regions ?
Uncle Cranker is offline  
__________________
Nothing really worth putting.
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 01:43 (Ref:2184527)   #14
NewsStalker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,063
NewsStalker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No - not his real one - the one he used but claimed he never used..
NewsStalker is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 06:15 (Ref:2184589)   #15
Denosaur
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Albania
Australia
Posts: 1,133
Denosaur should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridDenosaur should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
At the end of the day, both organizations have become 'a law upon themselves'.

Look at how AVE$CO/VE$A/TEGA have monopolies the sponsorship dollar and the the Intellectual Property rights over building V8 powered race cars in this country and possibly anywhere else in the world.

CAMS on the other hand, have taken up bullying everyone into submission in an attempt to also keep a monopoly on the sport. Which sounds similar to the above mentioned organization does as well to get there own way.

In reference to another thread, I see VE$A bleeding dry every corner of corporate Australia to stay alive in 10 years time and see CAMS going by the wayside if the same old people happen to stay. They're both "Old Boys Clubs" and those sorts of clubs only last as long as the members who try and keep the tradition and attitudes going.
Denosaur is offline  
__________________
It's all about speed! Hot, nasty bad-ass speed!!
Velociraptor Performance Industries
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 09:49 (Ref:2184698)   #16
Trevor
Veteran
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 1,497
Trevor should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I hear a strong rumour that VESA/AVESCO is forcing all old V8Supercar owners to remove the rear spoilers off the old cars as they (VESA) reckon they own them or their design, how low are these people going to go?

These are old cars for god's sake, what threat are they to today's cars?
Trevor is offline  
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 09:55 (Ref:2184709)   #17
bludvl_x19
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Australia
umop apisdn
Posts: 1,638
bludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Second that, I think I read it in eNews (the bit that I could be bothered waiting to load)
They will go as low as it takes for them to remain the top category , no matter what it takes. It could aldo be that some of these exV8SC are running in AASA events, and they have got their noses out of joint about that. Who really knows?

Mick
bludvl_x19 is offline  
__________________
Supercars isn't the sport. The sport is motor racing.
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 10:21 (Ref:2184722)   #18
Trevor
Veteran
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 1,497
Trevor should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I also know of a BA Falcon that runs a 5 litre V8 (with a carby, not fuel injection), not an ex-V8Supercar, but does have similar spoilers where the owner was told by CAMS that they wouldn't register it as it was too much like a V8Supercar, this bloke was running at AASA events the last I heard, I wonder why?

I thought CAMS was a Member Organisation?, not a VESA Organisation (old words, but worth repeating - LOL)
Trevor is offline  
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 10:52 (Ref:2184738)   #19
peckstar
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Cayman Islands
Posts: 16,040
peckstar has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
why would we have an issue with copyright/intellectual property?
peckstar is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 11:00 (Ref:2184749)   #20
BFC
Racer
 
BFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location:
australia
Posts: 376
BFC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Trev
I also know of a BA Falcon that runs a 5 litre V8 (with a carby, not fuel injection), not an ex-V8Supercar, but does have similar spoilers where the owner was told by CAMS that they wouldn't register it as it was too much like a V8Supercar, this bloke was running at AASA events the last I heard, I wonder why?

I thought CAMS was a Member Organisation?, not a VESA Organisation (old words, but worth repeating - LOL)
So if a road car had the same spoiler what would they do then?
BFC is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 11:04 (Ref:2184756)   #21
bludvl_x19
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Australia
umop apisdn
Posts: 1,638
bludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFC
So if a road car had the same spoiler what would they do then?
Get laughed off the road by anyone with a basic idea of how aerodynamics works, and probably canaried within a couple of days of being on the road.

Mick
bludvl_x19 is offline  
__________________
Supercars isn't the sport. The sport is motor racing.
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 13:47 (Ref:2184878)   #22
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Trev
Very interesting readin and from 8 years ago.

I particulalrly like these couple of little snippets:


This actually happened in 2004:


I really like this one:
Try doubling that fee these days, and the rest is true as well. Lakeside gone (and now back in a smaller way)

Well, that has come to fruition in part

What a laugh.
Oh you crazy kids, leave old school Crash Test alone!
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 20:40 (Ref:2185228)   #23
Trevor
Veteran
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 1,497
Trevor should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
We didn't realise you were such a visionary Crash, you are starting to move into the elite company of Uncle Cranker with your forward thinking - LOL
Trevor is offline  
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
Quote
Old 23 Apr 2008, 23:45 (Ref:2185373)   #24
NewsStalker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,063
NewsStalker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Trev
I hear a strong rumour that VESA/AVESCO is forcing all old V8Supercar owners to remove the rear spoilers off the old cars as they (VESA) reckon they own them or their design, how low are these people going to go?

These are old cars for god's sake, what threat are they to today's cars?
People have such short memories

Cast your mind back to the period between the changeover from Procar Utes to the current series - recall anything that happened with respect to the rear tray covers?

Same thing IIRC.
NewsStalker is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Apr 2008, 01:25 (Ref:2185405)   #25
Trevor
Veteran
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 1,497
Trevor should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ah yes, forgot about that, but it was one step against the VESA evil birds - hehehehehe
Trevor is offline  
__________________
I reserve the right to arm bears
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GTP To AVESCO? Will it Happen? GTRMagic Australasian Touring Cars. 44 21 Dec 2004 11:10
Whats with AVESCO? NOIDEAR Australasian Touring Cars. 6 11 Nov 2004 21:28
CAMS/AVESCO agreement pete55 Australasian Touring Cars. 26 14 Jan 2004 04:53
Nothing is sacred for AVESCO and CAMS anymore RaceTime Australasian Touring Cars. 21 23 Sep 2002 22:49


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.