Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 Mar 2002, 17:09 (Ref:230953)   #1
Simon Pullan
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location:
Lincoln
Posts: 216
Simon Pullan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Big grids

I was watching the 2001 season review today and noticed that you have huge grids in the V8 Supercar series. I take it most of them are privateers but what I wan to know is where their cars come from.

Are they all ex-works cars from a few years back or do people build their own cars? Do you just buy a chassis and body off the shelf from Holden/Ford and then go and build the rest yourself?
Simon Pullan is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Mar 2002, 21:35 (Ref:231190)   #2
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well, they're not privateers really, in the true sense of the word, anyway. There is just a big boom in the V8's at the moment, and we've got huge grids.

All the cars are AU/VT Falcons and Commodores, so none of them are more than a few years old.
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 9 Mar 2002, 00:13 (Ref:231307)   #3
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Originally there were only a couple 'pro' teams, who originally handed their cars down to the private entries. These days, just about everyone in the upper level build their own cars, and have some form of factory support. Most of the used cars get sold down to teams in the Konica Series, which is essentially the development class for privateers. Saying that, now some new cars are starting to appear in that class too...

Unless I've been misguided, the team purchase either a shell with cage fitted, or make their own out of kit of all of the different panels unassembled.
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 9 Mar 2002, 00:33 (Ref:231320)   #4
Simon Pullan
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location:
Lincoln
Posts: 216
Simon Pullan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Really! Wow. You must really be having a boom to have that many works supported cars. Is it pretty much a closed shop or do you see lots of driver fluctuations between seasons?

I take it the Konica series is the equivalent of the Busch series to the Winston Cup. Still high profile but many more paying drivers.
Simon Pullan is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Mar 2002, 01:41 (Ref:231368)   #5
marcus
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
marcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Australia
Posts: 12,053
marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!
yes Simon , I guess you could say the Konica series is like the Busch series in Nascar land , in fact i think thats a great description of it

as for driver fluctuations , you pretty much see the same people there at the front anyway , but yes new guys do come and go , maybe do a year or two and then dissapear and of course there is the endurance races at the end of the year , where each car needs two drivers and some even go for threee , and the field for that is around 40 cars I think (actually im not sure because they keep changing the damm rules on grid sizes !!!!!) but if it is 40 then you get to see at least 80 drivers out there , which gives plenty of people a chance in these cars really.

and yes as for building them , you can by a shell , there are some specialist shell builders who offer customer cars to just about anyone and you can build it up yourself from there , or you can purchase a year old car off one of the top teams.
factory support ????

well alot claim to have it but i dont know how they get supported to be honest ?
for some it just maybe a little cash advance , or we will pay for your fuel or something like that or maybe even a bit of technical data , but really its up to the team to get things going in their respective teams , becuase I would wait around for Holden or Ford to help me out for to long at all
marcus is offline  
__________________
In Loving memory of Peter Brock
I hate it when im driving in a straight line & Seb Vettel runs into me
GO THE MIGHTY HAWKS !!!!
Quote
Old 9 Mar 2002, 06:05 (Ref:231459)   #6
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think there are levels of factory support, ranging from monetary & technical support for the major teams, to just technical support for others and then down to just discounts on parts etc...

In Holden for example, they only really support TWRA, Perkins and Garry Rogers, the rest don't get alot of help, wheras Ford seems to spread there money over a larger number of teams, except for 00 Motorsport.
racer69 is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Mar 2002, 14:31 (Ref:232825)   #7
Simon Pullan
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location:
Lincoln
Posts: 216
Simon Pullan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thanks for everything so far, just one more question.

Are the rules such that all the cars from each manufacturer are almost identical? Lets take Holden for an example. Do HRT have trick engines and/or suspension and areo part parts or is it simply because they have the best engineers/strategists and generally the best preparation of the Holdens?
Simon Pullan is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Mar 2002, 21:33 (Ref:233106)   #8
White Knight
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The areo kits have to be the same, ie Holden's rear wing is identical on each Holden and similarly the the Ford one is common on the Falcons.

The frontal arrangement is addressed similarly. Actually the bottom half or splitter is common to both Ford and Holden. This came about after the Falcon kept breaking their everytime they had an offroad excursion, and the Holden one was thought to be better aerodynamically. So it was grafted onto the Falcon.

The fitment however is entirely up to the car builders. You would find that the HRT one for example may not neccesarily bolt onto a Castrol Holden.

Engines are built in-house in most cases and to a set of rules which I think are liberal on the internals. Obviously the skill of the engine builder determines just who has the most horsepower and torque. There are other factors as well including the engine manangement system etc.

Suspension is probably where the two cars differ the most with the Falcons double wishbone front end as opposed to the Holden's MacPherson Struts. The "experts" reckon the Falcon carries a little more mid-corner speed but that could be negated by the amount of rear wing set and/or how soft the springs are in the rear.

Having said all that I believe that the rules will change next year to give identical areo kits to both manufacturers, mandatory single diff (ratios are already standardised for various tracks) and one type of engine computer.

Effectively engine and body will be the only common denominator as in NASCAR but while they are tubular or spaceframe cars, V8 Supercars are chassis cars.
 
Quote
Old 12 Mar 2002, 05:23 (Ref:233311)   #9
kmchow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location:
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 3,919
kmchow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'm sure the teams/manufacturers have studied this more closely...but the use identical aero kits/parts have been mentioned. Won't the kit benefit one manufacturer more than the other? Nascar hasn't been able to escape this, so I'm wondering how can V8 overcome this problem?
kmchow is offline  
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever...
Quote
Old 19 Mar 2002, 04:33 (Ref:238985)   #10
Danielsun
Veteran
 
Danielsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 876
Danielsun should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
'Parity' is a most-abused word, Mr Chow. We've got it just about right as it is, so we don't need any more talk about it just for the moment. Well, if you take TWR out of it, there's parity...
Danielsun is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Mar 2002, 06:07 (Ref:239021)   #11
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Spot on... But I wonder how much the common undertray actually made a difference?

Anyways Dan, welcome back- where abouts in 'Vegas are ya now?
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 19 Mar 2002, 12:39 (Ref:239234)   #12
StuiE
Veteran
 
StuiE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Perth, WA
Posts: 2,405
StuiE should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Simon Pullan


Do HRT have trick engines and/or suspension and areo part parts
put simply, yes! combined with tonnes of cash and lots of whingers

Last edited by StuiE; 19 Mar 2002 at 12:45.
StuiE is offline  
__________________
Stu

"I think we broke something.......Traction" -Carl Edwards 19/8/06 MIS

05 - Peter Brock
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So if there were 3 car grids for '05.....how would they look? luke Formula One 25 3 Nov 2004 19:18
Filling grids graeme National & Club Racing 5 8 Apr 2004 12:56
Larger LM grids JAG Sportscar & GT Racing 20 1 Jul 2003 05:02
A way to increase grids Champ69 Formula One 16 15 Jan 2003 13:01
Low grids come September Chris Gray National & Club Racing 3 23 Sep 2002 21:30


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.