2017 Formula 1 fan survey

[Paradise City]

Sometimes people only think they know what they want. That's my problem with surveys.

See my sig for details.

[bauble]

Why should Formula 1 be about the highest levels pf technology? It's a SPORT when you get down to basics.

I am sure there are better ways of hitting a ball across a net than some bloke/bird banging it with a stick, and surely kicking a ball is pretty crude when you could use a cannon?
Knocking a ball around a field with a lump of wood could surely be done better by a gun?

No, cars should be designed to be hard to drive on circuits that punish mistakes, too much safety means almost any plonker with enough money can drive an F1 car, with no need to worry about hurting himself.

As it should say on the back of the ticket "Motor Sport used to be dangerous."

Bauble self proclaimed Old Git.

[Armco Bender]

• The percentage of fans describing Formula 1 as ‘exciting’ nearly tripled between 2015 to 2017

Good to see 3 people still find it exciting.

[ScotsBrutesFan]

They are probably from of the remotest of the 194 countries that they received a response from. Where they have nothing really exciting to judge against.

[AdrianM]

What I find interesting is that Hamilton was way down in the 2015 survey but is way up in the latest one. I'd be interested to see how they checked for duplicate submissions.

[Greem]

Originally Posted by Greem

I started to fill it in but some questions I didn't have an answer to, and it wouldn't let me do that. So I closed it.

First year university psychology students are taught questionnaire design and the pitfalls of leading the test subject. All it does is proves your own bias

Is this what the results show?