|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Dec 2018, 19:42 (Ref:3872501) | #6226 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
Montezemolo, former ferrari chairman has always been very involved in f1 program in his old days, he used the same threatening strategy during 2009 le mans week-end.
To me is a quite pathetic move.... step back from f1 to wec (if ever will still exist in 2020) means to lose about 90% of earnings that f1 ensures to RB just to fill 2 cars in grid... As far I've read some time ago, RB f1 budget for 2018 season was about 350mln €. Maybe RB isn't competitive enough to win titles but is the third most important team in grid, so at the end of the season, among sponsorships, TV rights, f1 rewards etc... should at least have earned about 400mln. Wec money turnover is just peanuts compared to f1. |
|
|
26 Dec 2018, 21:32 (Ref:3872516) | #6227 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
Potentially balanced out by a much smaller budget to be competitive. |
|||
|
26 Dec 2018, 21:58 (Ref:3872521) | #6228 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,396
|
Helmut Marko is the man behind these remarks, not Horner. I think he has a little bit more say in all of what RB does motorsport-wise than Horner. Horner is team principle of the f1 squad. Marko is RB's motorsports advisor. But it probably is the same pressure to get rules more to their favor.
|
|
|
27 Dec 2018, 03:49 (Ref:3872571) | #6229 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Quote:
Quote:
WEC is Not cheap. Compared to F1 maybe it is less expensive, but certainly not orders of magnitude cheaper. Fewer races, less exposure, less sponsor interest, no team or TV money .... Bascially a Lot of people have heard of Formula One. Not a lot of heard of WEC. Every F1 race is televised just about everywhere ... WEC has crappy streaming and little TV presence. I see this as a political move, maybe only internal politics. Red Bull ... do they really want to go to WEC and Keep getting beat by Ferrari? |
|||
|
27 Dec 2018, 08:36 (Ref:3872601) | #6230 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
Surely WEC will get cheaper in next future, but isn't about that;
F1 is a so big moneymaking business for a team like RB, that basically they would never drop off. Most of revenue from f1 isn't even contemplated in WEC (TV rights share, sponsorships). |
|
|
27 Dec 2018, 11:19 (Ref:3872618) | #6231 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
As for lack of exposure, WEC actually has pretty good TV coverage in Europe. They may not be on F1 level, but they get plenty of exposure. Red Bull has always been good at self-promoting regardless, so I doubt they'd find themselves much -if any- worse off than how things are in F1. |
|||
|
27 Dec 2018, 14:36 (Ref:3872659) | #6232 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,396
|
You can get by in the new regs with $30 million per season. That's a tenth of what f1 costs for a front running team. Even non-front running teams can spend a lot of money. McLaren is one of them. RB has plenty of cash to play with. They can be a partner with Aston Martin and run a RB livery on the Valkyrie or something and save money. I believe Honda is going to be giving them engines in f1 so they save money there too. An engine deal in f1 per season is probably more than half a team's budget in the wec for a season if not more.
|
|
|
27 Dec 2018, 15:11 (Ref:3872661) | #6233 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
Difference is that F1 teams spend a lot but by the end of season, recovers costs and earn money. Regardless of results most of time... just watch williams recent seasons; by paying drivers, sponsorships and TV rights share, they can finance awful seasons after seasons.
Has anybody here watched the RB spot with coulthard making donuts on top of dubai skyscraper heliport driving an old RB f1? During a tv show was revealed that RB spent about 8 mln€ for just that spot... A WEC hypercar program would be just bread crumbs for RB finances.... but at the end, bread crumbs is all WEC can ensure them |
|
|
27 Dec 2018, 15:51 (Ref:3872671) | #6234 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,582
|
It depends though on how they package and market it. The Red Bull brand is known the world over for loads of different sporting events, from F1 to stunt bikes, from aeroplanes to.... goodness knows what else. We are reaching a point where there are important people thinking about how much more sacrifice needs to be made on the great altar of the God of Formula 1 - the 'pinnacle of motorsport'. Of course the punters have heard of F1 and a lot less have heard of WEC (or whatever will follow), but that's a mindset and a media-savvy company like RB could begin to change that - if they wanted to. Look who won the BBC's 'SPOTY' this year - not 5 time F1 WDC Lewis Hamilton, but a guy that won the Tour de France. (Not that I'm intending to demean that achievement).
And not that I'll believe any of this RB to WEC stuff in the first place until I actually see it...... BTW, has anyone mentioned to Horner that there's a couple of Ginettas going begging at the moment....... |
||
__________________
44 days... |
28 Dec 2018, 00:38 (Ref:3872735) | #6235 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,396
|
I had a thought that if McLaren and/or Ferrari join, the series is near automatic big-time status. The wec secures one or both of them to play alongside Toyota and Aston Martin and it'll make headlines. I think there's something big lurking in the background and that's why the wec made this hypercar move. I hope so at least.
|
|
|
28 Dec 2018, 02:30 (Ref:3872741) | #6236 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,698
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
28 Dec 2018, 02:34 (Ref:3872743) | #6237 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,698
|
|||
|
28 Dec 2018, 08:22 (Ref:3872766) | #6238 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Quote:
In terms of exposure, prestige, and sponsorship dollars, F1 is pretty much the whole "heap" in motorsports, not just "top of the heap." Winning teams in F1 make serious cash. Winning teams in WEC barely make headlines. |
||
|
28 Dec 2018, 16:30 (Ref:3872838) | #6239 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,946
|
I don't think Red Bull (or anyone else) cares about WEC. They do however, care about Le Mans. If Red Bull want a WEC program, it's for the Le Mans victories, nothing else.
|
|
|
28 Dec 2018, 18:58 (Ref:3872862) | #6240 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,396
|
That can change if certain brands join the series. And with running the wec a necessity to do Le Mans, it improves it's status. A few years ago with Audi and Porsche still involved it was seen a lot differently than it is now with Toyota the only manufacturer left. In two or three years I think that goes back to 2016 levels of importance IF a big name or two joins.
|
|
|
28 Dec 2018, 19:22 (Ref:3872869) | #6241 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
||
|
28 Dec 2018, 21:21 (Ref:3872887) | #6242 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
And Le Mans wouldn't even be part of it, but rather return to separate one-off status. You may earn auto invites for it by winning those other big events the previous year (or the existing regionals), but you wouldn't automatically receive freebie entry just by being participant. That would also fix some of the issues with grid limitations EXAMPLE Round 1 Mar - Sebring 1000 Miles or 10 Hours (LM auto invites offered) Round 2 May - Europe I 1000KM (w/ Euro LMS and MLMC) Round 3 Jul - Europe II 1000KM (w/ Euro LMS and MLMC) Round 4 Aug - Japan 1000KM (w/ Asian LMS and maybe SGT) Round 5 Sep - Kyalami 9 Hours (LM auto invites offered) Round 6 Oct - Road Atlanta 1000 Miles or 10 Hours (LM auto invites offered) Two top teams that collected best results all year receive LM auto invites as well but there is no "championship" in line for anything, except maybe for overall chassis constructors Last edited by Deleted; 28 Dec 2018 at 21:47. |
||
|
29 Dec 2018, 09:52 (Ref:3872971) | #6243 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,946
|
I agree, but I think the ACO look at it the opposite way. They want a championship, so they use the prestige and positioning of Le Mans to force teams into the WEC - a championship they don't really want to run in (see Toyota trying to just do Le Mans, before being denied that).
I love WEC, but it's pretty clear that manufacturers don't. Maybe rather than pandering to manufacturers who never seem happy, they should be working on sustainable privateer regulations for LMP1. And then there's finally an excuse to drop Shanghai... |
|
|
29 Dec 2018, 14:07 (Ref:3873001) | #6244 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
They want to stop manufacturers from 'cherry picking' events - as was the case until around 2011 - yet they seem to have forget why the said 'cherry picking' existed... because for the most part the _championships_ are simply irrelevant to them, other than maybe having them as testing grounds (and extra showroom for corporate VIP guests). And in the future, with tech freeze, ban of testing and increased balance of performance to determine the outcome, even those testing grounds will become less important.
The concept of 'pyramid of endurance' is flawed, because there is no flexibility in it. |
|
|
29 Dec 2018, 21:49 (Ref:3873033) | #6245 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
I see it sort of that FIA needs to make as much money as possible and Le Mans is the lever which can pry open the wallets of the manufacturers.
Racing is really expensive nowadays. Possibly privateers could not support enough events to get enough exposure for their sponsors to attract sponsors—many sports have seen that happen. The tech is needed to maintain performance and to move the sport forward. Vintage racing is great, but for some reason, people would rather watch the latest tech on track. Otherwise, we could all go back to aluminum monocoques and four-cam injected ICUs and cheap, long-lasting tires (Continental makes a lot) and we could watch the same racing that thrilled us three or four decades ago. For some reason, people seem to want to watch new cars, not old. And even an LMP2 is not cheap to build, own, or operate. A lot of IndyCar fans talk about making the Indy 500 a one-off event—“Announce it and the will build the car and come.” None seem to ask who would pay for the cars—because 32 cars would lose and only one would get publicity commensurate with the expenses. A one-ff le Mans might end up the same way—not enough privateers willing to buy cars for one race a year, not enough constructors willing to design and build chassis for people who can only use them once a year—and who couldn’t pay enough to make the undertaking profitable. That is why FIA went with four LMP2 constructors—so that at least a couple wouldn’t lose too much money and disappear. Yes, the WEC might be irrelevant to the auto manufacturers building LMP1s—but they have to pay their dues, which in this case means supporting the series. I think that is why the FIA is Finally trying to get a handle on costs—they want the manufacturers to be less unhappy about having to race the rest of the season. The publicity will never be there, but if the cost isn’t quite so onerous, maybe the factories will be more willing to participate. |
|
|
29 Dec 2018, 23:22 (Ref:3873051) | #6246 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
I think it's very much flawed to suggest that WEC commitment is keeping manufacturers from racing at Le Mans. For the better part of a decade before the creation of a world championship the manufacturer participation in the top class at Le Mans was at pretty much its lowest sustained point in history, but with a world championship for a brief moment there was a double digit factory entry at Le Mans for the first time since 1999. Audi and Toyota specifically wanted a world championship as long as and so they had someone to race against. Those races in places like China and America are what makes the R&D investment for Le Mans more palatable to boards and marketing departments, especially without anything like ALMS or JSPC around for prototype racing anymore.
If you go back through the years you'd be hard pressed to find many big time sports cars that only raced at Le Mans outside the years there was no championship run under the same regulations, in which they were still fairly scarce. Thing about these regulations is they're poor as a stopgap though. They still depend too much on new technology and hardware that doesn't exist. Manufacturers could jump in during the 90s because the rules were setup to allow taking existing engines and a lot of chassis design and turn out a competitive car quickly, to the point Porsche won with an old Group C chassis twice and an ancient 935 based engine three times. Last edited by carbsmith; 29 Dec 2018 at 23:31. |
|
|
30 Dec 2018, 00:54 (Ref:3873059) | #6247 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,396
|
I agree with that on the series front. No one wants to just do Le Mans because that's a waste of money and effort to make a car and test just to potentially fail and have nothing to show for your investment. The wec is needed for that. Le Mans is always going to be first and biggest but to suggest no one cares about the wec is a joke imo. The fia/aco are right to make them run the series for an entry to LM. What needs to happen is a couple more big names to join and then the series will pick up steam again after vw left them high and dry.
|
|
|
30 Dec 2018, 03:21 (Ref:3873073) | #6248 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,723
|
Agreed that a WEC championship is vital to getting, and keeping manufacturer participation. A stand alone Le Mans is a failure.
The hypercar concept offers the opportunity for works teams and high level privateers to compete in machinery that is within the imaginative limits of the fans. It is also within the reach of limited production specialist manufacturers, and in fact may be more attractive to them than say BMW, Mercedes and Audi. To be attractive to teams the championship would need to include China and the Middle East where the interest in them as road (status) cars is at it's highest. |
||
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional. |
30 Dec 2018, 09:15 (Ref:3873121) | #6249 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,396
|
Quote:
|
||
|
3 Jan 2019, 04:31 (Ref:3873742) | #6250 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,480
|
The richness that I love about sports cars is the diversity over the years. Group 5, Group 6, Group C, GT1 and the various LMP's. Lot's of different looks and ideas up the front.
But I think the other side of that coin is the lack of continuity. It's been called the WSCC, WEC, WSCC, nothing, ILMC, back to WEC, plus C'ship of Makes, GT1 WC and those GT championships that have carried on the cause. Some real equity for example has been built up in the name LMP1 over the last decade. Yet all that name recognition is going to be discontinued and replaced with Hypercar(or whatever it ultimately gets assigned). From a branding point of view that's seems a poor choice to me. LMP1 has had Audi, Porsche, Peugeot Toyota etc invested a lot of money in winning under that category name, I think it's a waste to retire it. In building a viable World Championship I"d think they need all the continuity and brand recognition they can get. |
|
__________________
"All this amateur analysis leads nowhere and is insignificant......So you waste hours, days, months, years of your life for what end? A bit of one-upmanship on the internet?" - Wilton969 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] Glickenhaus Hypercar | Akrapovic | ACO Regulated Series | 1603 | 12 Apr 2024 21:24 |
[WEC] Aston Martin Hypercar Discussion | deggis | ACO Regulated Series | 175 | 23 Feb 2020 03:37 |
[WEC] SCG 007: Glickenhaus Le Mans LMP1 Hypercar | Bentley03 | ACO Regulated Series | 26 | 16 Nov 2018 02:35 |
ALMS Extends LMP Regulations | tblincoe | North American Racing | 33 | 26 Aug 2005 15:03 |
[LM24] Whats the future of LMP's at Le Mans?? | Garrett | 24 Heures du Mans | 59 | 8 Jul 2004 15:15 |