|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
1 Nov 2015, 16:38 (Ref:3587216) | #1 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,004
|
Rate the Grand Prix: Mexican Grand Prix
What score do you give Formula 1's return to Mexico?
|
|
|
1 Nov 2015, 20:46 (Ref:3587258) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
I can't go lower than 1, sadly.
Dullest race ever, even more so than the 2005 US GP. |
|
|
1 Nov 2015, 20:57 (Ref:3587261) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,108
|
Ditchwater dull.
1 |
||
__________________
@mitukshooter |
1 Nov 2015, 20:59 (Ref:3587263) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,755
|
3. Wasn't exciting.
|
|
|
1 Nov 2015, 21:11 (Ref:3587265) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
4. not very exciting.
I expected more, much more. Stadium sections are nice for the attending public, but do little - if not plain nothing - to improve the racing. The Mexico track I remember was such a nice track, why did they destroy it? |
||
|
1 Nov 2015, 21:27 (Ref:3587269) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,706
|
To be honest, they did not really change the character of most of the track, if not for the Peraldeltada. It's sad that its gone, but the runoff of that corner was way to small, and behind it is no room to make it larger.
|
||
|
1 Nov 2015, 21:43 (Ref:3587276) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 593
|
it deserved better but a 4 is all i can give.. some rain would have been welcome to spice things up
|
||
|
1 Nov 2015, 22:01 (Ref:3587290) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Another Mercedes manipulation by Wolff et al, 1.
|
|
|
1 Nov 2015, 22:07 (Ref:3587295) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
|||
|
6 Nov 2015, 11:53 (Ref:3588548) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,126
|
|||
__________________
Locost #54 Boldly Leaping where no car has gone before. And then being T-boned. Damn. Survivor of the 2008 2CV 24h!! 2 engines, one accident, 76mph and rain. |
6 Nov 2015, 23:05 (Ref:3588671) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
||
|
7 Nov 2015, 18:37 (Ref:3588829) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
I have to say I think there's some possiblity that it was an internal team pre-race arrangement to let Rosberg win in order to forestall any internal feuding.
|
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
8 Nov 2015, 13:42 (Ref:3589026) | #13 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 435
|
Rosberg has been matching Hamilton's pace for a few races now, at least in qualifying. But in Mexico he made no clumsy mistakes and had no car failures. While Rosberg has been unable to consistently beat Hamilton over a season, he has proven often enough he can rival Hamilton on a good day.
|
|
|
7 Nov 2015, 17:34 (Ref:3588814) | #14 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,242
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
1 Nov 2015, 23:00 (Ref:3587307) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,398
|
4
Good crowds and a circuit with history, but next to no overtaking, only really cars out of position. At least the legendary Peraltada is back... Oh no wait they've butchered that |
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
1 Nov 2015, 23:28 (Ref:3587319) | #16 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,242
|
1, despite the Pirelli Sombreros.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
1 Nov 2015, 23:43 (Ref:3587326) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,650
|
2. +1 for sombreros. +1 for the stadium. +1 for Finnish civil war. So 5
|
|
__________________
"Is this stock car racing or is this motorsport?!" - John Cleland |
1 Nov 2015, 23:45 (Ref:3587327) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Well, 2. I had the NASCAR on split screen with the F1, I found NASCAR mid-race drew my attention more. I enjoyed the idea of being back in Mexico but it was all and all an entirely grey affair.
|
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
2 Nov 2015, 00:06 (Ref:3587335) | #19 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,004
|
It wasn't great and calling it average is probably generous, but I thought it was at least a bit intense for the top positions. There was always a sense that Hamilton could do it. Vettel's uncharacteristic performance was interesting, Maldonado was dramatic and Bottas put a good move on Raikkonen but was turned in on. Average as a race, though. The track is okay but not full of great corners, I would say. Anyway average for me is still fun in motorsport.
|
|
|
2 Nov 2015, 01:21 (Ref:3587352) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,223
|
3. Pretty dull. I suppose coming off the back of the US Grand Prix - it was going to be tricky to get that excited by it. Vettel's fightback after the puncture was interesting - until he binned it. Bottas gave us some entertainment. There was little else. It does seem like a very tricky circuit to overtake on.
|
|
|
2 Nov 2015, 01:36 (Ref:3587357) | #21 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 383
|
The race itself was extremely dull, but the event was great, there was massive hype all week long and people loved it, some funny things too like a local Mclaren dealership partnering with Uber and sending Alonso to pick up a fan in a Mclaren 650S, some of the best fun I've had in a race, hope the WEC event next year can compare.
|
|
|
2 Nov 2015, 20:23 (Ref:3587606) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,057
|
Under average F1 race but certain sections of the course, the packed grand stands, large and enthusiastic crowd gave me a reason smile a few times.
5 |
||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
2 Nov 2015, 08:23 (Ref:3587417) | #23 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,737
|
There's acres of land on the infield where the track could be lengthened if necessary (it is)
The kink on the main straight... Why?!! Not a bad layout but how can you have so little overtaking at the end of such a long straight? Massive illustration of how something is very wrong with the tech regs. |
||
|
2 Nov 2015, 08:35 (Ref:3587421) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,706
|
Why is it nessesary to lengthen the track? It is as long as the circuits of Montreal, Budapest, Spielberg and Interlagos, and ofcourse longer than Monaco. No need to rob Mexican kids of their soccer and baseballfields.
|
||
|
3 Nov 2015, 12:53 (Ref:3587794) | #25 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,737
|
Quote:
With the exception of street circuits where there are clear layout limitations, a road course is better with at least 3 miles imo. Most of them are at least that length. But it is inherently wrong when people cannot overtake even with DRS on a near mile long straight!! |
|||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Official] Driver of The Grand Prix: Mexican Grand Prix 2015 | Born Racer | Formula One | 36 | 10 Nov 2015 15:32 |
[Official] Team of the Grand Prix: Mexican Grand Prix 2015 | Born Racer | Formula One | 14 | 3 Nov 2015 17:30 |
[Official] Rate the Grand Prix: United States Grand Prix 2015 | Born Racer | Formula One | 30 | 29 Oct 2015 12:55 |
[Official] Rate the Grand Prix: Singapore Grand Prix 2015 | Born Racer | Formula One | 38 | 24 Sep 2015 13:18 |