|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Dec 2001, 13:49 (Ref:187284) | #1 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 12,053
|
Technology allowed ?
Ok ..so I started a thread about ways of reducing costs which had some pretty good feedback ..so why not start one that will go the complete opposite way.
lets blow the budget totally and get all the whiz bang technology available to F1 teams and NASA for that matter and really get the V8 moving along. Ok enough ******...what should or would you like to see in V8's technology wise ???? |
||
|
18 Dec 2001, 14:08 (Ref:187291) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,135
|
in my eyes i feel that the SATCC V8 Supercar series is as good as you can get it. We all know that the V8 supercars, are not very technologically advanced, they are very heavy and have massive 600hp engines in the front. The computer systems are only really used by the top running teams, and definitely HRT (my fave team) of which try to get their hands on any technology they can. And you also see most of the lower classed teams using second hand cars from a top running team from previous years. The thing is, that we like it this way. Don't look on it as a reflection of Oz's people, please don't do that, but we have established this series to not be technologically advanced, but we have made it the best touring car catagory in the world, there is not doubt, 38 countries viewed the coverage of Bathurst, and got the highest sports ratings for one year, thats even more that the sydney olympics!! over 17 days!!! HAHAHAHAHA!! anyway...if we were to make any large change to this catagory, we would see changes too large and they would destroy the catagory, just look at the BTCC, where did the V70's and A4 and normal sedans go?! now they have been replaced by **** hatches and Astras!! (not taking anything away from Vauxhall or those teams) but really!!! anyway! this catagory promotes good drivers, and not good technology.
Till then! CYA!! |
||
|
18 Dec 2001, 18:38 (Ref:187363) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,012
|
This probably doesn't apply here but what the hell, for me apart from Bathurst the V8 series is a little like follow the leader at times and as I'm currently viewing the highlights of the 67 - 74 years, skinny tyres IMO would make for a much more interesting race.The attitude of some of these cars and the long slides thru the corners makes for some great television
Sorry marcus, this wasn't really what you had in mind was it!!!!! |
||
|
18 Dec 2001, 19:57 (Ref:187396) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,632
|
Sequential Gearboxes first up, not just stick shift either but behind the wheel paddles..wherever the driver wants'em.
Then let the teams go mad with aero kits - wind tunnel testing is heaps expensive right ? Also, a boost button - each car has a limited amount of nitro boost to be used during the race ? Oh, and lst but not least some sort of warp core, powered by a dilitium crystal matrix fed out to nacelles on each side of the vehicle. Gotta go now, time for my medication ! |
||
|
19 Dec 2001, 02:33 (Ref:187523) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,485
|
Energy Polerisers
|
||
|
19 Dec 2001, 05:19 (Ref:187534) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 9,208
|
LOL @ Bucky
Aluminium heads Traction Control Launch Control Kerb Hopping Control Automatic Gearboxes No rev limit Every panel must be acid dipped no less tha 10 times (ooops ) Some form of pitlane device that deters mechanics from standing in the road (ie bull bar, cow catcher...) Lazer guided missiles 10 stacker CD changer Ok, Bucky, I'll join you |
||
|
19 Dec 2001, 10:21 (Ref:187579) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,058
|
Don't forget...
Climate control Cruise control (for behind the safety car) Berylium pistons Fluffy dice Klingons off the starboard bow |
||
|
19 Dec 2001, 11:07 (Ref:187585) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,366
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
19 Dec 2001, 12:27 (Ref:187604) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,040
|
If you let the technology run too wild they would just become GT Cars, but anyway.............
-Auto Gearboxes -Traction & Launch control -Computer controlled suspension -no limit on testing or tyre choice or amount of tyres -no rev-limit and: More manufacturers |
||
|
19 Dec 2001, 13:05 (Ref:187613) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 370
|
I wish
scrap all current rules . then Grab the JTCC handbook follow it to the letter bring in some of there cars & watch Holden and Ford fall by the way side problem fixed I WISH bar that happening semi auto boxs TCS LCS unlimtied areo More Makes Quad cam engines (a must) weighting system ( for winners) F1 point system (to the letter) more rounds (min 22 rounds) driver positioning unlimited 12 hr race for bathurst (no extra points) konica to race in main season of period (summer seires) Bring on the GT cars |
||
|
19 Dec 2001, 13:59 (Ref:187625) | #11 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 12,053
|
LMAO...hahaha
you guys are crazy ...really crazy you have mentioned everything except for Fluffy dice ..or were they exclusive to HQ's ???? |
||
|
19 Dec 2001, 22:29 (Ref:187841) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,221
|
There are only two areas in which these cars aren't totally technologically advanced...
They have rev limiters; and They have pushrod engines in the front. Actually, Crash, they already have alloy heads. These engines are about 150hp better than the 5000cc engines used in the peak of the F5000 era! And they all use their computers, just some get more out of them than others... |
||
|
20 Dec 2001, 10:20 (Ref:187950) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,058
|
marcus, you'll find I mentioned the fluffy dice. Mind you, they'll have to be made of some high-tech, light weight fluff.
Ray, what about the live rear axle? Non-sequential (and the electronics that go with it) gearboxes? I also don't see what a rev limiter has to do for or against technology. It just means they won't try to rev the poor push-rod engines to 20,000rpm, it doesn't stop them using whatever materials that are capable of it (ok, it does elsewhere in the rules but it is not specific to the rev limiter). |
||
|
20 Dec 2001, 13:01 (Ref:187975) | #14 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 12,053
|
so you did Elephino
must have been too busy laughing at the klingons on the starboard bow line...that was classic |
||
|
20 Dec 2001, 21:28 (Ref:188241) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
And live rear axles... what a joke! Live rear axles with lumps of alloy bolted on to give variable camber and CV joins built into the driveshafts! Where else in the world is this technology being used? Are there electronics in the sequential gearchanges? I don't think it's necessary for them to function... |
|||
|
21 Dec 2001, 11:19 (Ref:188377) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,058
|
You never said it was about discouraging technology.
"There are only two areas in which these cars aren't totally technologically advanced..." Now while I agree that a rev limiter discourages the technology but as I said, it in itself, doesn't stop the use of the materials. So who is using all of this technology that could be improved in a number of ways. One of which would be to go fully independent and introduce exotic materials for the manufacture of the axle or the diff or any number of things that are extremely limited so that these new technologies aren't used. While it isn't necessary for the electronics to be there with the sequential boxes, the electronics are used to blip the engine on downchanges, use the clutch in some gearboxes (e.g. F1) and also to make the gear change itself quicker and better. Just look at the eletronic gearbox that Toyota had in their Corolla WRCar and that is not state of the art anymore. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F1 = Technology | riusnow | Formula One | 5 | 28 Apr 2001 08:39 |
F1 Technology | bobdrummond | Racing Technology | 31 | 19 Jul 2000 11:05 |