Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 Dec 2008, 10:58 (Ref:2347989)   #51
429CJ
Veteran
 
429CJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Finland
Otaku World
Posts: 2,193
429CJ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Pantano drove for Jordan in 2004, no points, team mate Nick Heidfeld got 3.
Pantano's change in F1 came and went.
429CJ is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Dec 2008, 19:16 (Ref:2348354)   #52
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Just because Pantano won the GP2 title doesn't mean an F1 team must give a Formula One test.

There are many factors as to why or why not a driver gets a test. Experience, skill, financial backing, potential etc.

Pantano has been around for a long time now and although he won the GP2 title this year, it will most likely be his ultimate triumph as his face simply doesn't fit on the F1 grid.
f1manoz is offline  
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die!
Quote
Old 5 Dec 2008, 19:48 (Ref:2348376)   #53
pirenzo
Veteran
 
pirenzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
London, UK
Posts: 10,241
pirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I do think its a shame he hasn't been offered a test. But then it doesn't sound like he's exactly been around asking for one either.

Ultimately, he's too old. For my money he's slightly better than Senna, di Grassi and Buemi, but they're young, and have time to improve. Arguably they will all end up better than Pantano.

You have to feel for the guy though. Think how long he's been pursuing his dream. To have done everything you can possibly do to prove yourself, and then just be discarded without a mention must be a real kick in the teeth. Sure, he has no right to a test, but the sport has been quite cruel to him.
pirenzo is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Dec 2008, 19:52 (Ref:2348384)   #54
wapomumalo
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Spain
Galiza
Posts: 53
wapomumalo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Magnusson
Never take a press release at face value. Oh, and Mecachrome doesn't to the gearbox either, GearTek (the Italian one, not the US company that shows up on Google) does. As far as Mecachrome designing the engine or not, let's go to the horse's mouth:


From http://www.mader-racing.com/fr/Histo...istorique.html. Though note that they claim to have done the gearbox too - I suspect that they hand a hand in it, as designing a full race car requires cooperation.

If you're desperate for links about the BMW connection, I'll give you a few. Information on this is scarce at best as Renault does its best to hide the origin of the engine.

http://www.grandprix.com/mole/mole17179.html <- The Mole certainly thinks it's a Beamer
http://www.forum-auto.com/sport-auto...ujet378163.htm <- As do these people
http://tentenths.com/forum/showthread.php?t=101842 <- As does others on this forum

Of course a lot has changed along the way but the base of the engine is still a BMW. I'm sure others in the know will back me up on this info (Sam! Were are you?).
Jimmy Jimmy Jimmy, your sources sounds like the sources from 911 Truthers...



Yep, ask for help...Now you´ll end up saying that the Supertec F1 engines built by Mecachrome back in 1998 and beyond, where also BMW blocks as well...



Well, well...let´s not make wood from the fallen tree...

I´d previously done my research and had found the very same "sources" on the google, I can trust in your info or dump it...I choose the first.

wapomumalo is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Dec 2008, 19:53 (Ref:2348386)   #55
Mekola
Veteran
 
Mekola's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Kiribati
Atlantis
Posts: 6,635
Mekola should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridMekola should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridMekola should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Twenty years ago he'd surely found a place in F1.
Even could have raced many years for backmarker teams, like (for example) De Cesaris did.
Mekola is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Dec 2008, 10:18 (Ref:2348747)   #56
Teretonga
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,365
Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by f1manoz
Just because Pantano won the GP2 title doesn't mean an F1 team must give a Formula One test.
There are many factors as to why or why not a driver gets a test. Experience, skill, financial backing, potential etc.

Pantano has been around for a long time now and although he won the GP2 title this year, it will most likely be his ultimate triumph as his face simply doesn't fit on the F1 grid.
No it doesn't but it seems strange that a series like Formula Master can offer a 'play' in a F1 car, WSR offers a 'test' and yet GP2 offers..... nothing....

The rest is entirely because he didn't make an impression the first time round with Jordan and although he has won the GP2 title after 4 attempts he still hasn't made an impression in doing so...
Teretonga is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Dec 2008, 14:44 (Ref:2348901)   #57
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Pantano made completely the wrong career choices in recent years. It might have been worthwhile to contest GP2 in its first year, but after that he had little to gain by winning the title. If he'd got a decent ChampCar drive, or even sportscars or DTM, maybe he'd have a solid career there - possibly even a route back into F1 (as demonstrated by Bourdais and partly by Glock). Seven years at the second tier of single-seater racing just suggests a slow learner. Would he get seven chances to impress in F1?
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Dec 2008, 22:16 (Ref:2349875)   #58
Dixie Flatline
Veteran
 
Dixie Flatline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Australia
Melbourne
Posts: 1,811
Dixie Flatline should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by BootsOntheSide
Would he get seven chances to impress in F1?
Nope. He's had one chance and he blew it.
Dixie Flatline is offline  
__________________
"Brakes are no good. They only make you go slower." - Tazio Nuvolari
Quote
Old 9 Dec 2008, 11:48 (Ref:2350909)   #59
jambo1998
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3
jambo1998 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
At the end of the day Pantano had his chance in F1 and didn't deliver, he took several attempts to win the GP2 title (several chances in F3000) and then even still that was a lot of luck.

Senna and Di Grassi are both younger and up and coming drivers. Senna will always get sponsors with his name.
jambo1998 is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Dec 2008, 12:00 (Ref:2350918)   #60
Hesketh
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location:
Bloody Milan
Posts: 188
Hesketh should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Pantano simply does not have the talent and the wits to be a F1 diver.
Hesketh is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sport-Darwinism: Are you happy with "independent" midfielder teams get out of F1? Mekola Formula One 10 17 Jun 2002 03:36


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.