Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 Jan 2005, 10:55 (Ref:1207002)   #26
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Yes.

I asked a similar question with regards Italian F3000 using 1999 Lolas this year - and was told it was fine.
Kicking-back is offline  
Old 22 Jan 2005, 12:43 (Ref:1207090)   #27
indycool
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
indycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridindycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Walker has announced two Lolas, no drivers, no sponsors. HVM just announced two cars, Dominguez as one driver, no sponsors. IMO, these are season-plan announcements that are designed to call attention and give exposure to the teams in their searches for sponsorship. Maybe it'll help.
indycool is offline  
Old 22 Jan 2005, 18:28 (Ref:1207280)   #28
Ac.
Racer
 
Ac.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Canada
Waterloo, Ont.
Posts: 343
Ac. should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by indycool
Walker has announced two Lolas, no drivers, no sponsors. HVM just announced two cars, Dominguez as one driver, no sponsors. IMO, these are season-plan announcements that are designed to call attention and give exposure to the teams in their searches for sponsorship. Maybe it'll help.
Very possible, although the HVM release states "From a business perspective it will be a change of identity for the first time since 2001, with new sponsors joining the development of the company." Could be just spin, but that wording sounds like at least some new sponsorship has been signed.
Ac. is offline  
Old 22 Jan 2005, 19:10 (Ref:1207316)   #29
rustyfan
Veteran
 
rustyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Sweden
Posts: 5,419
rustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ac.
Could be just spin, but that wording sounds like at least some new sponsorship has been signed.
Could be, but what it doesn't say is whether the sponsors in question are smaller associate ones or bigger primary ones.

Speaking of sponsors, I wonder if any Champ Car - or IndyCar ones for that matter - have thought about about trying to put together sponsor deals that involve multiple sponsors over the year, the type of deals that have been around in NASCAR for some time now (the most recent being Robby Gordon having four different primary sponsors for the 2005 NASCAR NEXTEL Cup season).
rustyfan is offline  
Old 24 Jan 2005, 17:10 (Ref:1208703)   #30
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Regarding the Chasis differences, I'm looking at a Bridgestone calender I have with Bourdais, PT and AJ. On the front wing of PT and Bourdais' cars they have two levels of elements. AJ's car has one. It's possible those secondary elements are unique peices, but to me they look too substantial.

rustyfan, that's definately an interesting concept. Think of it this way, it would probably be easier to get Canadian sponsors for the Canadian races, Mexican sponsors for the Mexican races, etc. That model might be ideally suited to CC.

I'm not sure if these preliminary season intentions announcements are intended to help draw attention to the series or the teams or both. I don't really mind in any case, because we've been starving for information.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 24 Jan 2005, 19:12 (Ref:1208828)   #31
Tiresmoke
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
Chicago, IL
Posts: 221
Tiresmoke should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snrub
Regarding the Chasis differences, I'm looking at a Bridgestone calender I have with Bourdais, PT and AJ. On the front wing of PT and Bourdais' cars they have two levels of elements. AJ's car has one. It's possible those secondary elements are unique peices, but to me they look too substantial.
different courses have different needs for downforce, hence more or less wing elements.
Tiresmoke is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Walker Could Sit Out 2005 Dov ChampCar World Series 37 10 Mar 2005 01:43
Finally, confirmed Aus GT in 2005 D.R.T. Australasian Touring Cars. 130 24 Feb 2005 01:00
Mike Conway confirmed in F3 for 2005 Kicking-back National & International Single Seaters 14 4 Nov 2004 16:17
Sato confirmed for 2005 swatty Formula One 44 7 Oct 2004 16:41


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:34.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.