|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
17 Nov 2009, 10:29 (Ref:2583423) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Engine checks
Out of interest, were any FF1600 Kent engines subjected to eligibility checks this year?
I ask because having competed previously in 750MC Formula Vee we became used to having to dismantle the engine in parc ferme at least once a year, with the winner's engine often the subject of intense scrutiny. I was always in favour of this, even though it irritated at the time when you just want to head home, just because it put everyone's mind to rest. I didn't see any checks this year and wondered if perhaps I'd missed something. |
||
|
17 Nov 2009, 18:57 (Ref:2583664) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 450
|
Quite a few engines were sealed this year. One of our engines were sealed along with 3 others from the north west (that I am aware of) and I know two Irish engines, unusually but clearly stated in the ford tech regs, with the bellhousing sealed to the engine.
Scruty checks on the friday evening at the WHT and (from what I heared, not saw) there were carburetter's being taken apart. Starter motor and reverse gear checks were also done on the sunday morning. I think it is good that this type of checks were done, the ones who are racing to the book have nothing to hide. I didn't hear much being done at the Festival however. |
||
|
17 Nov 2009, 21:24 (Ref:2583756) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 136
|
I was at the checks after the WHT and the carbs were removed and inlet maniflod internals checked. Thickness of the black rubbery gasket also checked.
|
|
|
17 Nov 2009, 23:44 (Ref:2583863) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 276
|
I didn't hear much being done at the Festival however.[/QUOTE]
First 3 at the festival final were all sealed and at the bellhousing, hence the results still being provisional, Scott Malverns and Nevile Smyths are both on their way to Bold for inspection, assume that Rorys is on its way to Scholar, BRSCC should know the outcome soon. |
||
|
18 Nov 2009, 08:32 (Ref:2583989) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,229
|
What is the significance of a reverse gear check?
Is it just to make sure you have one fitted for drag? |
|
|
18 Nov 2009, 08:37 (Ref:2583990) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 276
|
|||
|
18 Nov 2009, 08:53 (Ref:2583994) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
Don't give him ideas Dave!
|
||
|
18 Nov 2009, 08:56 (Ref:2583997) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 300
|
I think you simply have to prove that you have an operative reverse gear. I have a JP box with the manual (cable pull) reverse gear modification and have had to prove that it works many many times. Infact - thats the only time I ever use it!
|
||
|
18 Nov 2009, 11:51 (Ref:2584093) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Thanks. That answers my question.
As I suspected, I missed it..... |
||
|
19 Nov 2009, 13:58 (Ref:2585089) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,920
|
That's the only time you want to try and use it
|
||
__________________
Built and Engineered FFZetec 2006 festival winner. 3rd 2009 & 2012 FFZetec festival final |
25 Nov 2009, 21:05 (Ref:2589226) | #11 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
Cliff Dempsey Racing looses 2nd at Formula Ford Festival over technical infringement
Full story on www.ff1600.ie
|
|
|
27 Nov 2009, 17:38 (Ref:2590298) | #12 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
This press release can be viewed on the BRSCC home page www.brscc.co.uk
|
|
|
27 Nov 2009, 20:09 (Ref:2590370) | #13 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
|
Not sure I believe the bit about the engine not been used during the season for the national championship. From what I here and seen had alot of trouble with missed gears during testing which leads to engine changes. I think it is good karma he got caught cheating. Both him and team deserve it for stealing national championship from Rory Butcher. I was at race that weekend and it was crazy the decision made by motorsport Ireland. Scott had Rory pushed tight to grass and interlocked wheels with only two choices brake and let scott drive over his front wheel or hold station and take corner. Scott had all the room and new he had no chance to pass on outside as it always ends in contact at that corner. Have watched racing for years and it is always the same at the second corner in mondello and Scott knew this as he had raced here before. Also would like to point out that mechanical failure cost scott the championship he failed to finish race when car broke down.
|
|
|
27 Nov 2009, 21:08 (Ref:2590401) | #14 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
As you are such an expert you will also know that Scott wasn't in the same car at the Festival. He only got the money together at the last minute and that is why Cliff Dempsey hired Noel Carey's car for him. The engine came with the car but due to a problem with the carb it was swapped out for one from Stephen Patton from a back up engine. The carb was checked during the event and passed. Exactly the same car, engine and carb were then used at the Walter Hayes 2 weeks later by Patrick McKenna. Do you think he was cheating as well? Did he have any performance advantage??? Last edited by Asp; 28 Nov 2009 at 12:03. |
||
|
27 Nov 2009, 21:13 (Ref:2590405) | #15 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
Funny that your post as a very similar theme to one posted earlier and now removed by the moderator from another rookie who only posted for the first time today! I have known Scott Malvern for the whole of his motorsport career; more than 10 years and the one thing he most definitely is not is a CHEAT! Neither for that matter is Cliff Dempsey Racing. This is a mistake, an oversight even perhaps a minor negligence brought about by circumstances but the one thing it most certainly is not is deliberate cheating. Scott rented the car from the team so he put his faith in them. Similarly the team put their faith in the engine and carb supplier which was because this was a replacement carb was from a different supplier to the engine. This is just a most unfortunate set of circumstances but nothing more than that! If Scott was a well healed young driver like many (but not all) of his peers he wouldn't have been put in this compromising position as he would have been able to use the same car that he had used all season. But he struggled to find the money and it was a very last minute arrangement.Cliff Dempsey to his credit worked very hard to give him the very best car he could such is his regard for Scott. Scott is a very talented and, those who know him will agree also a very likeable young man. Unfortunately what he also is, is someone who continuously struggles for funding and has done throughout his career but he and his family through sheer hard work and dedication and sacrifice manage to go racing and I'm very glad that he does. He definitely does not deserve to be ostracised over this and he has already been punished enough for an event he had no control or influence over. Last edited by Asp; 28 Nov 2009 at 12:03. |
||
|
28 Nov 2009, 00:03 (Ref:2590495) | #16 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
|
I just gave an opinion am not looking to blacken anyones character. I think both Scott and Rory are good drivers and both deserved to win the championship. It was my opinion from what seen and heard that day, that at most it was a racing incident that is it. It was not a good way to end championship for either driver or sport again just my opinion which I know you wont like but is all I am going to post about it. I would just like to point out that I know both car and engine were not ones he ran all year but as you have now informed me that it was off team spare engine the faulty part came from. I just find it hard to believe that at some point the spare engine was not needed. And I know if or when it was ran it was put in and run in good faith but at end of day in this sport at club level it is driver who ends carrying blame for mistakes made by others. I know this does not reflect on Scott as person but unfortunately it was him that got excluded or that is what results show. Again not interested in stirring **** just gave my opinion as ff1600 fan. I want to be able to watch close ff1600 racing for next many years which is why I go in first place.
|
|
|
28 Nov 2009, 00:32 (Ref:2590513) | #17 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
Whether either incident was an intentional act by Rory only he truly knows. I actually prefer to give him the benefit of the doubt. But in both cases it was bad driving and that's why for both incidents he was punished. When Rory won the Festival I was one of the first people to shake hands with him as both I and Scott have done many times this year. We wish him no malice and as I said after the hearing concluded "I hope both drivers can now put this behind them and get on with their promising careers"...I'd like to think this will be an end now to all the sniping and derogatory remarks but I guess that's hoping for a bit too much! DM |
||
|
28 Nov 2009, 00:41 (Ref:2590518) | #18 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
With regard to the championship Rory had taken Scott off at the race previous and got punished for it, are you telling me that a driver any driver should be able to keep taking his rival off all the time and go on and win a championship ?? With regard to that spare engine it had a full rebuild including a block and was only ever used for testing as it was giving alot of problems ! So no it was never raced but it was given back by the engine builder before the Festival saying it was perfect to use now !!
|
|
|
28 Nov 2009, 07:16 (Ref:2590607) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
I heard a guy once asked driftwood what he thought about engine checks. His reply:
"Fine by me, so long as they clear the bank". |
||
|
28 Nov 2009, 08:42 (Ref:2590621) | #20 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
Press Release – Saturday, 28th November2009
From Scott Malvern Regarding 2009 FF1600 Formula Ford Festival I am naturally very disappointed to have my 2nd place taken away from me in the Kent Formula Ford Festival Final but I am in complete agreement with the reason for it happening. The carburettor on the Ray GR06 car that I was driving developed a fault and needed to be replaced. It was replaced by the Team for a carburettor from a spare engine that had recently been rebuilt. At no previous time during 2009 have I used that spare engine or carburettor. Everyone knows that I only put a deal together at the last minute for the Festival and because of that I was in an unfamiliar car hired for me by Cliff Dempsey. The carburettor was actually tested for legality at the event and passed. After the Festival Final the engine and carburettor was sealed and the same car, engine and carburettor was used two weeks later at the Sir Walter Hayes Trophy by Patrick McKenna. Both the team, Cliff Dempsey Racing and the supplier of the carburettor Stephen Patton have apologised to me unreservedly, and without prejudice, over this regrettable incident. They have both assured me that this was a genuine mistake. I am satisfied with their explanations and now want that to be an end to the matter. Engine supplier Neil Bold is blameless in this issue. I don’t want this one unfortunate incident to tarnish what has been a brilliant effort by all concerned for my first season in car racing. I now just wish to focus on 2010 and securing a drive in Duratec Formula Ford and further prove my ability in the MSA British Championship. END |
|
|
28 Nov 2009, 10:14 (Ref:2590650) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
When Kris Meeke won the Scottish Rally a few days ago having already stitched up the IRC Championship at the previous round his car subsequently failed post event scrutineering with an issue with the subframe.
Although he was rightly removed from the results, I have yet to hear of any accusations that Kris Meeke is a cheat or an unworthy champion. In my opinion the lessons to be learned from the discussions of the last day are that: 1) Genuine mistakes can happen in all Formulae and at all levels. 2) Formula Ford Kent engines are now so antiquated and good parts so difficult to obtain (even through a "top engine builder") that ensuring performance equality is nigh on impossible. The only way would be by increasing random checks throughout the season which I doubt would be feasible financially for the club. Even then the sparsity of AX blocks and top quality components means there will always be some engines more powerful than others but built to the same rules. If there is a need for a junior FF series feeding to the MSA championship with modern ecu controlled engines, as opposed to enthusiasts racing Kents, then the sooner it is announced the better. |
||
|
28 Nov 2009, 10:25 (Ref:2590656) | #22 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
|
Thanks for the update on engine. As I said in begining I would have been surprized if a team had not used its spare engine during year but as you explained you had only recived it back from full rebuild and are at mercy of engine builders. Mistakes do happen. I agree to that Rory Butcher has a strong engine but this is always been the way in formula ford some engines are better then others.There is always engines out there that are better than others, ed moore, gavin wills all the top drivers in formula ford have had them and all have been sealed and passed through their dominent seasons.Is there any word on the other two engines that were sealed that weekend. Was good to see engines sealed as it used to be standard that top three in festival were sealed back in it day.
With regard national championship I think two boys had great year racing very close all year with very little seperating them. I think when you have two drivers this close there is always going to be incidents. It has been like this for years, the fifth place battle in the festival final is good example of this. I dont think there was any intentional incidents between the two from knockhill on it was just close racing and a tight fight for a championship that both deserved. If the racing was not this tight it would not be formula ford. |
|
|
28 Nov 2009, 12:02 (Ref:2590721) | #23 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,698
|
OK guys, some have you have rightly spotted that previous threads on this topic have been removed. I think that everyone in this thread has now clarified any previous comments - so hopefully everyone's now happy with each other. I'm also sure that this topic needs to be discussed.
But, it's worth a very timely reminder:
Other than that, please carry on if you want to |
||
|
28 Nov 2009, 12:28 (Ref:2590734) | #24 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
I think all that needed to be said has been said and it is time to move on !!
|
|
|
28 Nov 2009, 12:38 (Ref:2590741) | #25 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pre race checks | anna_blakemore | Racing Technology | 38 | 1 Jan 2009 23:11 |
Engine Legality Checks | Bob Pearson | Club Level Single Seaters | 10 | 16 Aug 2005 15:43 |
Noise checks | Willsie | Track Day Forum | 7 | 5 Apr 2004 12:10 |