Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 Apr 2003, 18:53 (Ref:579763)   #1
Jay
Veteran
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
United Nations
Canada
Posts: 6,038
Jay should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Cart to dump pit windows for good!

Cart press release:
Quote:
INDIANAPOLIS (April 24, 2003) – Less than one week after the Franchise Board of the CART Champ Car World Series voted to add more flexibility to its rule-making process, the owners and management of the series combined Monday to ratify a number of positive rule enhancements that will carry the open-wheel series through the remainder of 2003 and well beyond.

The Franchise Board accepted CART Champ Car management proposals for changes designed to enhance competition, which will go into effect with the May 31 Bridgestone Presents The Champ Car World Series Powered by Ford event at Milwaukee, and includes a measure that eliminates the mandatory pit window rule that was enacted last season. The rule, which stated that cars must pit within a specific number of laps, was put into place in 2002 in order to eliminate fuel-economy racing – a factor that was in large part resolved by the addition of new ECU systems in the Ford-Cosworth XFE engines. CART Champ Car management maintains the ability to use the pit-window rule on oval tracks of over 1.5 miles in length – a mandate that helped promote tight racing on the larger ovals in 2002.

In a move intended to provide fans the opportunity to follow thrilling races to the checkered flag, late-race restarts will have a different look beginning in Milwaukee. A ‘move-over’ rule will go into effect during the last 10 laps of a race, giving the Chief Steward the ability to send all lapped cars to the end of the restart line, giving the lead cars the chance to battle each other without having to negotiate lapped traffic.

The Franchise Board also showed its support of management initiatives in a number of new rules that will be phased in over the next three seasons – rules that should go a long way toward ensuring the continued success of the series by allowing teams to get more use from their sponsorship dollars. Many of the new rules were targeted at reducing the expenses incurred by teams on race weekends and addressed concerns over team rosters and the maintenance of race-ready spare cars.

“The changes voted on today allow Champ Car teams to better maximize their operations without detracting from the technical aspects of the car or taking away from the exciting racing,” said CART Champ Car Vice-President of Operations John Lopes. “We were able to identify budgetary areas where teams could make better use of their resources, and these moves will go a long way toward ensuring what should be an exciting future for the series.”

The teams will also designate a primary car, which will go through technical inspection Thursday afternoon, and will not be allowed to run a spare car unless the primary car is damaged beyond repair, as determined by the Champ Car Stewards. If the car is damaged before qualifying, the spare car may be used without penalty. If the spare car is needed at any time after qualifying is completed, the car will start the race at the rear of the field, regardless of where the team qualified. The spare cars, will be available for the fans in the paddock to view them, a hallmark of Champ Car’s fans-first approach. The spare car rule will go into effect beginning with the event in Milwaukee.

In addressing 2004, CART Champ Car will take a page from other major sports such as the NFL and the NHL and fix the number of personnel that teams can carry on their rosters. Teams will file a roster of 15 working crew members per car to take to events, not to include marketing and public-relations personnel. In addition, Champ Car will freeze all aerodynamic specifications and components as of May 20, 2003, locking those specifications in for 2003 and 2004.

This move also eliminates chassis update kits but allows management to study any necessary moves toward creating parity among the competing chassis manufacturers, enhancing value for the sponsors, teams and fans. The rules for 2004 will also eliminate the third shock and mandates the use of a mechanical differential only. For 2005, Champ Car management got the green light from the Board to review and study the next generation of engines and chassis, including adaptations to gearboxes, data-logging systems, mechanical differentials and braking systems, and will be giving its recommendations to the Franchise Board in the near future.
Jay is offline  
__________________
"I used to hate writing, but now I enjoy it. I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" - Calvin and Hobbes
Old 24 Apr 2003, 21:42 (Ref:579954)   #2
racefanatic
Racer
 
racefanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
United States
Mindy
Posts: 393
racefanatic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
YES!!!!!!!! That's the best news I've heard all day! The spare car thing sounds Like an IRL rule though...
racefanatic is offline  
Old 24 Apr 2003, 21:50 (Ref:579960)   #3
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by racefanatic
YES!!!!!!!! That's the best news I've heard all day! The spare car thing sounds Like an IRL rule though...
They have the spare car rule in F1 also
Kicking-back is offline  
Old 25 Apr 2003, 00:42 (Ref:580053)   #4
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yay.
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Old 25 Apr 2003, 01:10 (Ref:580070)   #5
Flatspot
Veteran
 
Flatspot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
United States
Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,301
Flatspot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
All good moves!
Flatspot is offline  
__________________
A good friend will come bail you out of jail. A true freind will be sitting next to you saying "Damn...that was fun!"
Old 25 Apr 2003, 03:49 (Ref:580135)   #6
Muzza
Veteran
 
Muzza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Brazil
Newbury Park, CA, United States
Posts: 1,754
Muzza should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Cart to dump pit windows for good!

Quote:
Originally posted by Jay
Cart press release:
In addressing 2004, CART Champ Car will take a page from other major sports such as the NFL and the NHL and fix the number of personnel that teams can carry on their rosters. Teams will file a roster of 15 working crew members per car to take to events, not to include marketing and public-relations personnel. In addition, Champ Car will freeze all aerodynamic specifications and components as of May 20, 2003, locking those specifications in for 2003 and 2004.
I sense that this measure is being implemented not only to reduce operating costs of teams already in the championship, but specifically to make CART yet more attractive to F-3000 scuderie.

F-3000 is dying and Pook wants to grab as much of it as possible.

Cost-cutting and competitivity-increase measures introduced by Max Mosley to the Formula 1 rulebook are going to make more attractive (or less painful..) to F3000 teams to make the jump to the so-called pinnacle of motorsport, hence CART management has to raise its game if it wants to lure F-3000 refugees to cross the pond.
Muzza is offline  
__________________
Visit The Motorsport Memorial
Old 25 Apr 2003, 06:35 (Ref:580232)   #7
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Remember why they brought in the pit window rules? A car that started near the back would pit at every opportunity in the opening stages, and have a big economy run at the end, winning without passing any cars on the track. Then again, the new rules bring contrived races... so I suppose we are better off having some back markers taking home the silverware
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Old 25 Apr 2003, 22:21 (Ref:581104)   #8
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Remember when they use to line up the cars in the correct order before going green again? That really sucked, they spent half the race playing traffic cop.

Freezing aero componenets kind of sucks. It's not right that teams are stuck with an inferrior Reynard chasis. You could probably argue that Lola would still develop faster. IMO Pook needs to allow Reynard to make some changes to bring them closer to Lola. Obviously that's hard to do because it wouldn't be fair to say "guess what now Reynards are faster than Lolas." Take it too far and things aren't fair.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 26 Apr 2003, 06:04 (Ref:581279)   #9
StuiE
Veteran
 
StuiE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Perth, WA
Posts: 2,405
StuiE should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yep, all the new rules sound good to me, hopefully it will give us some better racing

I thought that Reynard was allowed some sort of update package for mid-season or something?
StuiE is offline  
__________________
Stu

"I think we broke something.......Traction" -Carl Edwards 19/8/06 MIS

05 - Peter Brock
Old 26 Apr 2003, 19:57 (Ref:581605)   #10
Russfeld
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,840
Russfeld should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If they're dropping the fuel window entirely, why the bizarre rules at Brands? Either keep it the way it is until you drop them, or drop them early.
Russfeld is offline  
Old 26 Apr 2003, 23:37 (Ref:581746)   #11
Jay
Veteran
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
United Nations
Canada
Posts: 6,038
Jay should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
They're not dropping it completely actually. They may still have it for some oval events such as Germany, Fontana and Milwaukee. That said, I think they view Rockingham as a "roval" thus they feel these rules will help competition somehow. I don't agree, but there's my attempt to explain it.
Jay is offline  
__________________
"I used to hate writing, but now I enjoy it. I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" - Calvin and Hobbes
Old 29 Apr 2003, 00:27 (Ref:583312)   #12
NGS
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location:
Nebraska, USA
Posts: 75
NGS should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yay.
NGS is offline  
__________________
Screw the innocent. And the guilty.

Nigel Graham Schlemming
Old 29 Apr 2003, 01:00 (Ref:583332)   #13
Flatspot
Veteran
 
Flatspot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
United States
Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,301
Flatspot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Russfeld
If they're dropping the fuel window entirely, why the bizarre rules at Brands? Either keep it the way it is until you drop them, or drop them early.
I agree that this seems a little strange to go about things this way. Perhaps this is a test for possible use next season that is something between the mandatory pit windows of the past and no pit windows at all as they will run on the balance of the street and road courses.

As such, it would make sense to do it at Brands as none of the teams have experience on this course and are therefore less likely to corrupt the test results.

Last edited by Flatspot; 29 Apr 2003 at 01:03.
Flatspot is offline  
__________________
A good friend will come bail you out of jail. A true freind will be sitting next to you saying "Damn...that was fun!"
Old 6 Jul 2003, 16:11 (Ref:653992)   #14
shurikus
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
Russia
Posts: 27
shurikus should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
just one stupid question
why these mandatory pit windows are still alive?
shurikus is offline  
__________________
well, the Brickyard's there to crucify anyone, who will not learn
I climbed a mountain to qualify, I went flat throught the turns
but I was down in the might-have-beens and an old pal good as died
and I sat down in Gasoline Alley and I cried
Old 6 Jul 2003, 17:12 (Ref:654018)   #15
gttouring
Veteran
 
gttouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
USB 3.0
Posts: 4,536
gttouring should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
All good moves-The team roster idea is fab- beating NASCAR to the punch. NASCAR already has every crew member wear their names on the back of their suits so this is a move to make it a team sport more or less. like "oh no mr.X lost the crew chieef job and now he is on the Mi-jack team they will certainly improve" similar to how F1 recognises team principles and technical directors...
this is good but Perhaos they should allow Falcon to adapt their chassis to allow a number 3 manufacturer
gttouring is offline  
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story.
Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET
I am shameless ...
Old 6 Jul 2003, 17:23 (Ref:654023)   #16
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
That stillborn crapwagon? They'd have to basically start with a clean-sheet approach. And that'd just be more money to spend, which is the absolutely last thing CART can do right now.
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Old 6 Jul 2003, 22:10 (Ref:654246)   #17
gttouring
Veteran
 
gttouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
USB 3.0
Posts: 4,536
gttouring should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
well let falcon deal with it, i am sure they'd be happy to if they were allowed to join the series.
and let a few teams test it, or runa second car in the race.
I don't see how it'd be so tough after all just a carbon mod on the rear panels and the majority of windtunnel tests are done.
gttouring is offline  
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story.
Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET
I am shameless ...
Old 6 Jul 2003, 22:34 (Ref:654263)   #18
macdaddy
Veteran
 
macdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Canada
St.Catharines Ontario
Posts: 8,125
macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!
That article Jay posted to begin this thread was from last April. I think Jay was trying to point out the fact that there weren't supposed to be any pit windows at all by this stage of the season.
macdaddy is offline  
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!
Old 7 Jul 2003, 15:19 (Ref:654906)   #19
shurikus
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
Russia
Posts: 27
shurikus should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
macdaddy, but is it "Cart press release"? i couldn't found it even at cart.com
shurikus is offline  
__________________
well, the Brickyard's there to crucify anyone, who will not learn
I climbed a mountain to qualify, I went flat throught the turns
but I was down in the might-have-beens and an old pal good as died
and I sat down in Gasoline Alley and I cried
Old 7 Jul 2003, 15:27 (Ref:654911)   #20
macdaddy
Veteran
 
macdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Canada
St.Catharines Ontario
Posts: 8,125
macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!
http://www.cart.com/News/Article.asp?ID=5878
macdaddy is offline  
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!
Old 7 Jul 2003, 15:32 (Ref:654914)   #21
Jay
Veteran
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
United Nations
Canada
Posts: 6,038
Jay should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
That was before the Brands disaster, a race without pitwindows (for all practical purposes) that turned into a parade because everyone was in conservation mode.
Jay is offline  
__________________
"I used to hate writing, but now I enjoy it. I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" - Calvin and Hobbes
Old 7 Jul 2003, 15:46 (Ref:654923)   #22
Russfeld
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,840
Russfeld should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Cleveland was a parade too
Russfeld is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good job at CART official website Muzza ChampCar World Series 16 1 Nov 2003 12:42
Cart to dump mandatory pit window ? Jay ChampCar World Series 22 3 Apr 2003 03:47
Cart & Alms = Good Fun Flatspot ChampCar World Series 16 6 Oct 2002 02:04
Good CART websites domaza ChampCar World Series 8 13 May 2001 02:25


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.