Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > My Track Designs

View Poll Results: Do you like this track?
Yes 5 100.00%
No 0 0%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 Nov 2005, 11:57 (Ref:1467355)   #1
shambles
Veteran
 
shambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
England
Soton, UK
Posts: 1,119
shambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridshambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sherwood Motorsports Park

Sherwood Motorspeedway

It would be located, in a vast chasm of deserted land, located near Nottingham - hence the name Sherwood Motorspeedway, in deference to the forest in that locality that housed Robin Hood, once upon a time.

The circuit would have a great infrastructure, both pitlanes being Hi-Tech facilities, with plenty of room. There would be V.I.P, Hospitality, HeliPads, Press Towers and Vast grandstands allowing upto a maximum capacity of 250,000.

The Oval

The oval, would be a an average length of 2.8 miles, making it a SuperSpeeway. It could be visted by all types of Oval racers, NASCAR, ASCAR, IRL, Champcar, Indy Lights etc... It would run in a clockwise fashion, with the Grandstand Turn being the first corner. This is a flat right, which leads onto the 8 degree banked turn of The Run which requires a slightly wider entry, but still flat. The backstraight turn is simple, and it leads down the long back straight. The Bank, isn't banked - moreover signals the start of the banking returning, this is flat out, and gradually the banking returns to 8 degrees for The Ridge, before increasing again to 12 degrees for Marathon. Daytona is again a flat right hander, the circuit would be pretty much full throttle! It would be likely to be ran over 150 laps, thats about 420 miles. The supporting walls underneath the backstraight (to hoist it at a height over the road course) would curtail where it says Backstraight on the map, and just past where it says The Bank on the map, this is to provide adequate run-off space through the Sweep on the road course.

The Road Course

The road course then, is also run clockwise, and would be in itself about 3.5 miles. The sector points are;

Sector 1: Completed three quarters of the way up The Climb
Sector 2: Completed at The Link
Sector 3: Completed on the Start/Finish line.

The circuit could host Formula One, A1GP, GP2, F3, GP Masters, WTCC, BTCC, Renault World Series, EuroBOSS,Porsche Supercup, MOTO GP, World Superbikes and British Superbikes. The courses start/finish line would be about a mile south of the back straight of the Oval, and is about 80 foot lower than that.

From the startline would head Southwest towards the first corner, Carousel. This would be a slow to medium speed hairpin, as the cars negotiate it. It is in two parts, the entrance and the exit. You would line up your move into the entrance, looking to get alongside on the right, so you can get better traction through the exit. The corner would flow nicely. The long left hander that comes next, takes the cars uphill by about 20 ft, making the entrance for Force 10 - and uphill approach. Force 10, is a tight corner, which would provide ample opportunity to pass. The long straight that follows Force 10, is called The Climb. It does exactly what it says on the tin, dipping slightly after Force 10 (about 10 ft) before regaining that high to reach a top height of 60 ft (20 ft beneath the backstraight of the oval) before sweeping through The Switch downhill (imagine the gradients of Mosport Park for The Switch) then cars would continue flat out through Tyrell, before heavy braking into EJ10 - this would be a hard left hander, which gives cars a great passing opportunity, the approach is downhill, due to the lowering of height through the Switch (which lowers immediately at the crest) and Tyrell. EJ10 leads onto a short burst, before the double apexed corner of Vodafone. Overtaking could occur through the second part, and is not too similar to the corner at Bahrain that leads onto the backstraight (behind the pits) there. It's then a great run through Mach 5, a really quick right hand sweep, before the balanced throttled Callow. The exit of which heads right, for the tight Seaman (in honour of the pre-war British driver, Dickie) This corner would be another overtaking opportunity. Its then a case of high speed, climbing up towards the Link, before dipping heavily through the Link. Under the backstraight again, the cars start to lose height, a gradual exercise that The Descent takes care of. The Descent itself is not a straight, it is a series of deft turns, kinks and bumps. It finals straightens out - about 100 meters before the penultimate turn, The Point. This is a really tight left hander, which would provide great overtaking possibilites, as well as entriging wheel to wheel racing through the HexaTurn - a mammoth Five apex turn, which would lead smoothly back onto the start finish straight.

The amount of laps this circuit would be run under would vary from series to series, for F1 it would be about 52 laps.

The Combined Course

The combined course would be suitable for FIA GT, Grand AM and other similar series. I have added a separate track map for this course! It could be started on either startline, but I would be inclined to start on the road course. The road course joins the oval at the Esses. This is a quick right left sweep, which would put the cars on the oval, just prior to the Bank. The cars would then follow the oval normally, untill just after the Backstraight turn. After which, the Cannon hairpin comes. This is a difficult, drastically downhill corner. And would be one of the better overtaking places on the track!

I hope you like this, please comment!!

thankyou

PAUL
Attached Thumbnails
Sherwood Motorspeedway.JPG   Sherwood Motorspeedway, Combined.JPG  
shambles is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Nov 2005, 15:11 (Ref:1467525)   #2
mandretti39
Veteran
 
mandretti39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Lithuania
Clay, NY USA
Posts: 661
mandretti39 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridmandretti39 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by martin-1
Sherwood Motorspeedway

The Oval

The oval, would be a an average length of 2.8 miles, making it a SuperSpeeway.
<begin rant>
The average length of an oval is NOT 2.8 miles. The longest oval in the US is 2.66 miles, Talladega Motor Speedway. I would say the average length of an oval is less than 2 miles.
<end rant>

The track looks good. Interesting shape to the oval, could be a challenge.
mandretti39 is offline  
__________________
"How many frickin' times do I have to say, 'In the form of a question', people?!?" - Alex Trebek
Quote
Old 22 Nov 2005, 15:19 (Ref:1467528)   #3
JohnMiller
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Rutland
Posts: 3,069
JohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Don't most ovals run anti-clockwise.
JohnMiller is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Nov 2005, 16:39 (Ref:1467594)   #4
luke
Veteran
 
luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
England
West Sussex, England
Posts: 7,263
luke should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridluke should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I America they do. But there are a number of oval tracks in England and I expect over the world that run clockwise. (stock car racing which here is banger racing not NASCAR that is, with minis and stuff)
luke is offline  
__________________
The thrill from west hill
Quote
Old 22 Nov 2005, 16:45 (Ref:1467596)   #5
shambles
Veteran
 
shambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
England
Soton, UK
Posts: 1,119
shambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridshambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I made the oval run clockwise, simply to be different. Is there a rule that states all ovals must be anti-clockwise? I wasn't stating the actual length of all ovals are 2.8 miles, I am saying mine is. Just to clear that up for you guys.

PAUL
shambles is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Nov 2005, 17:08 (Ref:1467617)   #6
JohnMiller
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Rutland
Posts: 3,069
JohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No rule AFAIK, but you won't get any oval NASCAR-type tin-top races as the driver would be sitting against the wall...
JohnMiller is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Nov 2005, 17:16 (Ref:1467631)   #7
shambles
Veteran
 
shambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
England
Soton, UK
Posts: 1,119
shambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridshambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ok cool

I suppose the oval could be manouvred so as to run anti-clockwise, although I'd wonder how they would implement safety for the combined course.

PAUL
shambles is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Nov 2005, 20:42 (Ref:1467819)   #8
Alwaysfirst
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
United Kingdom
The rural idyl.
Posts: 1,064
Alwaysfirst should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Love the oval though I think even as a circuit it would be better anti-clockwise (i.e. not just for practicality). Not too sure on the road course though.
Alwaysfirst is offline  
__________________
RIP Dan Wheldon, 1978-2011. 2005 & 2011 Indy 500 champion, 2005 Indycar champion

RIP Marco Simoncelli, 1987-2011. 2008 250cc champion
Quote
Old 22 Nov 2005, 23:47 (Ref:1467936)   #9
shambles
Veteran
 
shambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
England
Soton, UK
Posts: 1,119
shambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridshambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
How come dude?

PAUL
shambles is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Nov 2005, 16:14 (Ref:1468452)   #10
the_royksopp
Veteran
 
the_royksopp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Denmark
Skørping, Denmark
Posts: 1,800
the_royksopp should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Isn't the poll rather irrelevant? Mod?

The track isn't all that bad though! .
the_royksopp is offline  
__________________
TR!
Quote
Old 23 Nov 2005, 18:43 (Ref:1468627)   #11
shambles
Veteran
 
shambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
England
Soton, UK
Posts: 1,119
shambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridshambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Lol cheers dude - as for the poll, I just thought it might be a good record to top this thread, in case anyone looked at it, to gain some general opinion, and make it more interactive. But possibly it is irrelevant, i'll leave it for the mods to declare

PAUL
shambles is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Nov 2005, 23:02 (Ref:1468881)   #12
Purist
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 5,892
Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!
I'm that strong either way, but I think I like the road course overall. It does have some interesting corners I must say; it probably works best being run clockwise. I DO like that oval though, and with relatively low backing, speeds shouldn't get too insanely high.

Passing on the road course I think will be reasonably possible at Carousel, the Switch, Mach 5 (like the first turn at Suzuka), and the Point. I also think Force 10 and the approach to Callow have potential. Those other turns, Martin, are preceded by runs that are too short, and/or corner combinations that break the needed flow into those tighter corners. For example, EJ10 is preceded by Tyrrel, and the run up to the Link is not very long.
Purist is offline  
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain.
Quote
Old 23 Nov 2005, 23:17 (Ref:1468889)   #13
shambles
Veteran
 
shambles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
England
Soton, UK
Posts: 1,119
shambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridshambles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think that's a fair assessment Purist!

Although regarding EJ10, I envisaged that Tyrrell would be flat out, like the esses sections at Magny Cours - allowing the drivers to carry there speed through to EJ10 - but maybe they would need to lift, because the straight before is to long.. so your probably right lol. I would probably tend to agree with you.

PAUL
shambles is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Miller Motorsports Park Tailwind ChampCar World Series 4 8 Sep 2005 19:50
Budweiser Motorsports Park Edmonton Trackside 2 3 Oct 2003 15:37
Barber Motorsports Park KC Bike Racing 3 24 Sep 2003 08:12
BC Motorsports macdaddy ChampCar World Series 15 28 Jan 2003 12:22


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.