|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Dec 2016, 17:33 (Ref:3697659) | #1801 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,997
|
In credit to them, we all thought they would be the laziest with changes, but this is a big departure from the stock ligier
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
21 Dec 2016, 17:34 (Ref:3697660) | #1802 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,464
|
I can't say I see anything "Nissan" on it (maybe it's because the logo isn't there). Looks good though
|
|
|
21 Dec 2016, 17:35 (Ref:3697661) | #1803 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
|||
|
21 Dec 2016, 17:40 (Ref:3697662) | #1804 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,997
|
Yeh that grille is signature Nissan, look to the LMP1 too
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
21 Dec 2016, 17:41 (Ref:3697663) | #1805 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
21 Dec 2016, 17:53 (Ref:3697664) | #1806 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
|||
|
21 Dec 2016, 18:11 (Ref:3697668) | #1807 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
It is ugly but I like it. At least they have been aggressive with the front and the air intakes for the engine.
|
||
|
21 Dec 2016, 18:22 (Ref:3697670) | #1808 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
That's absolutely hideous, but that's fine because it's different and we need ugly ducklings too.
So is that the IMSA lineup complete? Loving it! |
|
|
21 Dec 2016, 18:32 (Ref:3697671) | #1809 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
||
|
21 Dec 2016, 18:54 (Ref:3697675) | #1810 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
In the looks department, this is a step back from the Ligier, while the Mazda is a step forward from the Riley and the Cadillac is about even with the Dallara imo.
|
|
|
21 Dec 2016, 19:09 (Ref:3697677) | #1811 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
And they only did that much because IMSA rejected their initial design. In other news, still shaking my head at how many people around the internet honestly thought every DPi would feature road car styling cues. Last edited by FormulaFox; 21 Dec 2016 at 19:18. |
|||
|
21 Dec 2016, 19:28 (Ref:3697679) | #1812 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,464
|
||
|
21 Dec 2016, 21:20 (Ref:3697696) | #1813 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,997
|
Quote:
I don't know, I get your point for sure, but I think there is a decent amount visually different on a top level. How much are we really hoping for here? Mazda is beautiful, an a mile above what I personally expected to see. The Cadillac is fairly lightly tweaked I'd say, This Nissan job, I think the nose looks pretty different from the stock ligier, they've also seemingly done some big work on the side ducks. It's not exactly pretty, but I think it's as much as I was expecting. I'm also impressed at what they've done considering Nissan don't seem to have given much input to the car. As far as I've read, this is mainly Patron funded Isn't the whole point of this category to put branded panels over a stock chassis? I get your point totally so don't assume a big fight with me, I just think this one is good enough by the standards I expected. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
||
|
21 Dec 2016, 21:50 (Ref:3697707) | #1814 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
Ultimately, this car isn't branding. It looks KINDA like the front of a GT-R if you squint at a low-res image that's at an angle, but it's ultimately just an extra piece of carbon over the nose and a couple other minor tweaks. We know that Onroak submitted a design that was rejected for not having substantial enough changes, and seeing how little(yet much) of the Dallara changed for the Cadillac that speaks volumes about how little they must have changed. This means they were not concerned with the branding(unsurprising given what we know about the program). I'd be willing to bet that the nose piece was crafted solely to make IMSA happy without having a severe negative impact on the overall aero. Quote:
Frankly, the GM put more effort into the Cadillac than Onroak did here. The individual changes on the Caddy may be small, but there's so many of them that I spot a new one every time I look to compare pictures of it and the Dallara. |
||||
|
21 Dec 2016, 21:53 (Ref:3697709) | #1815 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,451
|
It’s like choosing between eclairs and Napoleons. They’re both delicious.
|
|
|
21 Dec 2016, 22:04 (Ref:3697716) | #1816 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Oh, to be clear I'm not saying I don't like any of this. I'm happy IMSA has 7 different cars to WEC/ELMS' 4, and I like all three DPi designs, I'm just being realistic about the design details here.
|
||
|
21 Dec 2016, 22:13 (Ref:3697717) | #1817 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,491
|
|||
|
21 Dec 2016, 22:24 (Ref:3697719) | #1818 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
That is one new car that truly deserves the name "Daytona Prototype".
You'll notice if you look close that the front grille isn't even a real duct, it vents right back out over the top of the nose 6" back. The only other change is the addition of turbo intakes to the rear fenders, something you can find on pretty much every car to have multiple engine options including a turbo in the last 20 years. They might have opened up the side duct in the sidepod a bit more. |
|
|
21 Dec 2016, 22:43 (Ref:3697724) | #1819 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
"Pretty cars, are those who win" (Juan Manuel Fangio)
There is one thing I can't understand. Why Nissan was forced to make more changes and create this bodywork, while the Cadillac is 99.5% a Dallara? I like the Nissan anyway, it's a race car. The front could look better if the original nose could been hidden better. |
||
|
21 Dec 2016, 22:55 (Ref:3697727) | #1820 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
The reason the air vents out a few inches later us because this is just a cover over the original Ligier nose. Without more changes you can't do anything else. The fact the nose kinda maybe sorta has a Nissan style to it is coincidental, as that is the original Ligier nose creating that look.
All this is is a wing laid over the old bodywork. The caddy sharpened off all the round edges on the Dallara dotted about. This one didn't bother with that. It's fine tbh. But it's obvious why imsa sent them back to change more. They've done the minimum they had to do to be allowed to stick a Nissan engine in it and drop the Gibson. A cynic would say that because they'll be the only Nissan DPI, they'll get a favourable BOP as there will be no other Nissan cars outperforming them which would be the benchmark. Had they ran a Gibson then they'd have to be the fastest Gibson engined car to get any advantage out of the BoP. |
|
|
21 Dec 2016, 23:08 (Ref:3697730) | #1821 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
The P2 cars will be allowed to make some changes. After the tests, IMSA will allow P2 cars to change engine mapping, TC and gear ratios, because those items are fixed on the ACO championships. They said that the ACO P2 configuration couldn't be competitive at IMSA tracks.
About the Nissan, we have to remember that the team is supposed to be paying for the bodywork, because it is not a Nissan factory effort. So, I can understand why they took the short route. |
||
|
21 Dec 2016, 23:39 (Ref:3697736) | #1822 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
22 Dec 2016, 00:36 (Ref:3697745) | #1823 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 906
|
'Nissan' you say.
|
|
__________________
. . . but I'm not a traditionalist so maybe my opinion doesn't count! -TF110 |
22 Dec 2016, 00:53 (Ref:3697747) | #1824 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
And he was wrong.
Quote:
At most, the Cadillac is 85% Dallara. While nowhere near as significant as the Mazda, I'd say that if your goal is being visually distinctive, a 15% difference is sufficient. If you look at the Nissan, you'll notice that aside from the strip over the nose, the only stand out modification is to the leading edge of the rear fenders - and it looks like it may have been more for extra cooling flow to the engine than a stylistic alteration(judging by the openings). If that's all the was changed under the initial submission, it would be nowhere NEAR as much as GM changed on the Dallara. The nosepiece may be hiding some other small alterations as well, but for nothing to be jumping out I have to assume that they were woefully insufficient in the absence of the nosepiece as well - assuming such alterations are there. |
|||
|
22 Dec 2016, 00:56 (Ref:3697748) | #1825 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Any bets on ESM regularly having that additional piece of nose bodywork fly off during races by "accident?"
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IMSA DPi/P2 vs WEC LMP1-L | Danathar | Sportscar & GT Racing | 7 | 5 Nov 2015 17:55 |
New Rules - Discussion | DKGandBH | Formula One | 28 | 19 Jan 2005 01:40 |