|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Dec 2009, 12:37 (Ref:2597252) | #51 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Personally I've always been impressed with Smith. OK so he might be more reserved on camera than some but so what? He has delivered the goods in style.
I'd like to see him do F2 as another year flogging around the same UK tracks he'll never race on again in BF3 for a ridiculous amount of money would only be of use if he won it, but even then what next? At least winning F2 would get him an F1 test like Soucek. |
||
|
10 Dec 2009, 22:50 (Ref:2597538) | #52 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
As far as I know the rule hasn't been changed - I believe it was what kept Lewis Hamilton out of the Award - certainly not in recent times. |
|||
|
11 Dec 2009, 00:44 (Ref:2597602) | #53 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,156
|
Ridiculous post. You seem to have somehow ignored the views of everyone on here and not taken into consideration Smith's circumstances whatsoever. You should stick to your theory's more often because you have just made yourself look like a fool. Who on earth are you to come here and critisize the winner of the most prestigious award a junior driver can win after claiming the Formula Renault title despite not competing in the pre-season testing and opening rounds simply because he was trying to secure a seat in F3 after his performances at Donington in 2008 warranted him a drive? But of course he didn't have budget so he did the next best thing, and look what he's just won through determination.
|
||
__________________
Steve McQueen- "Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting." |
11 Dec 2009, 02:06 (Ref:2597637) | #54 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
It's sort of the right thread but a couple of years too late. Nick is definitely better than Stefan Wilson, who did win it, but then JP had a big say in how things went in recent years until now. Last thing I heard Nick and Porsche Supercup were being mentioned in the same sentence.
|
||
|
11 Dec 2009, 02:47 (Ref:2597656) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
He was right up at the front in the final rounds at Abu Dhabi, and finished 2nd in the German series at Dijon. It's a shame if he's lost to single seaters, as I think the guy is seriously talented.
|
||
|
11 Dec 2009, 09:41 (Ref:2597797) | #56 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Dec 2009, 13:15 (Ref:2597882) | #57 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,137
|
I think F2 would be the right championship for someone like Nick. No testing, super teams and bang on the pace, also he must be respected by Palmer and co.
|
|
|
11 Dec 2009, 15:49 (Ref:2597965) | #58 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
I'm a big fan of Nick's and know him well - if I had the money I'd stick him in a top F3 (or even GP2) team - but he knows why he didn't win the award in 2007! |
|||
|
12 Dec 2009, 23:29 (Ref:2598706) | #59 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
No, if you say so I'm happy to believe you, but I still think Nick should have won the award!
|
||
|
12 Dec 2009, 23:39 (Ref:2598709) | #60 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Well I'm not going to disagree with you!
|
||
|
18 Dec 2009, 10:17 (Ref:2601812) | #61 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
||
|
19 Dec 2009, 16:30 (Ref:2602399) | #62 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Cheers! I must say, it's quite fun being part of the top 10 list-making (I've always been a sucker for lists!), except for the fact that you always have to leave people out who you'd like to mention. I've already had one driver contact me to ask why he isn't in the list and he has a good case, as do many others.
So, go on then, I'm asking for it! What do people think? Who should be higher/lower, or who should we have included? Kevin Turner Autosport |
||
|
19 Dec 2009, 17:42 (Ref:2602437) | #63 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 Dec 2009, 19:14 (Ref:2602464) | #64 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 51
|
I read comments made by miniman, and agree, then see the response it attracted. Thank god there is someone out there like miniman who actually says it as it is. For sure, Dean Smith is a good driver and congrats to him in getting the award however, the harsh reality is that Dean has been around for many years, has far more experience than the other candidates and had a huge advantage. I just dont get the autosports awards, to me it is to recognise and award the next possible british formula one champion or top of any major series, not too act as a consolation prize for someone who has reach his peak. Smith is someone who has been tested and failed before and on one day can prove himself slightly quicker in a car he already has experience in or if he could do more press ups or whatever they do, just crazy. The criteria should be changed, namely only new award candidates only, none of which have ever raced the test cars and that have very limted car experience but with success in what they do.Win or lose, the prestige will help some talented young drivers, give them a chance.The award should never be given to the person who needs the money more. Its so obvious that previous experience is not taken into account, Dean has been around for years, yes he won the BMW championship years ago but only recently inherited the renault uk title due to calado`s mechanical failures and his mysterious last round penalty from pole to start from 9th or 10th!! More race wins, more poles, more fastest laps in only his second year in cars, these are award winning facts. For me and probably many honest others, the best race driver and best current british prospect, by far, didnt win the award!!
|
||
|
19 Dec 2009, 20:36 (Ref:2602489) | #65 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
That's a curious post.
Jamie Calado is fully sponsored by Racing Steps and has already signed to race with Carlin BF3 next year. He has no need of the award, other than the title. On the other hand, Dean Smith has always had to struggle to find the money and several of us on here think he was a far more deserving candidate, so the result is just fine. |
||
|
19 Dec 2009, 21:06 (Ref:2602497) | #66 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,725
|
Dean Smith ran well at Donington in his only F3 outing to date back in 2008, unfortunately money meant he couldn't make the jump and attempt to prove himself over a season. Hopefully winning this award will allow him access to a quick car in a competitive category, then me can really assess his ability. For me, he was always in a no win situation this year coming back to Formula Renault, but he did a good job. He's now won Formula BMW as well as Formula Renault here in the UK, not many young drivers out there can say that!
As for the award itself, I lost respect for it the night they decided to give it to Stefan Wilson in 2007. As time has proven, that was a rather bizarre decision! |
||
|
20 Dec 2009, 10:55 (Ref:2602657) | #67 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 368
|
|||
|
20 Dec 2009, 20:06 (Ref:2602863) | #68 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
20 Dec 2009, 20:54 (Ref:2602881) | #69 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
OK, I'll bite!
Quote:
There seems to be a misconception that what the drivers do during the season has an impact on the final decision. The fact is the drivers' seasons get them chosen, then the scores are effectively reset. You could well argue that James had a better season than Dean in FRUK - though our correspondant who went to virtually every round, knows them and the teams well wouldn't agree - but the point is it is not the important factor when it comes to who wins the award. The decision is based on how the drivers perform over the test days. As it happens James and Dean were - predictably - very close, but Dean edged it. If we just chose the guy who everyone already rated then there wouldn't be a need for a test and we'd just get accused of jumping on the bandwagon of a driver who looks the most likely to make it. As for Dean failing before, are you aware of why he failed before? Are you saying that if a guy has another great season - at the right level - but has appeared before he should just be ignored? Last edited by krt917; 20 Dec 2009 at 21:04. |
|||
|
20 Dec 2009, 21:01 (Ref:2602887) | #70 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I too believe that James Calado is a fine talent - and he is not the only one out there - and I hope he will go far. That is one problem with the award - you only get one winner, but that doesn't mean the other drivers aren't good! |
|||||
|
20 Dec 2009, 21:17 (Ref:2602895) | #71 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,725
|
I'd be interested to know why Jonathan Palmer and Snetterton had nothing to do with the Awards this year? Would it be wrong for me to put two and two together? There was something a little political about that 2007 decision. I wasn't at the test days and have no access to any information from them. However, Stefan must have produced form on those days that he'd never produced before or since - he couldn't even hold a handle to a very average bunch of Class B racers in F3 in 2008!
Just as the FIA are accountable when it comes to decisions I think there should be a written explanation each year to explain why the award was given to a certain driver over the others. That would then give more credit to the award and the driver, as well as installing faith into the decision that is reached. |
||
|
20 Dec 2009, 21:40 (Ref:2602908) | #72 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 668
|
Quote:
|
||
|
20 Dec 2009, 22:31 (Ref:2602939) | #73 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,725
|
Well we have this award shoved down our throats week in and week out in Autosport magazine leading up to the Awards evening. Readers help decide the finalist for this award so I feel a certain degree of accountability is required. If it was an award, kept in house like some of the category Scholarships then it would be a different matter in my eyes. The lack of accountability is the reason that questions are asked, particularly when you consider years such as 2007......
|
||
|
20 Dec 2009, 22:41 (Ref:2602946) | #74 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Thank you for your support Mak.
I am, however, happy to respond to Gaz's points. Quote:
It certainly had nothing to do with Stefan's win, which has attracted a lot of discussion. I have my own views on 2007 that I will keep to myself, but I'm sure the decision was made in good faith - i.e. it wasn't political, but was a judgement made by the judges given the events at the tests. This is something that has been discussed. Obviously we're not obliged to, but I think it would be good to give a bit more info. It's still being discussed, but I'm afraid I can't say anything more at the moment! |
|||
|
20 Dec 2009, 23:28 (Ref:2602977) | #75 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
I obviously didn`t know James and Dean were close in the test but not suprised. I had read that James had tested a F3 before the awards test but if you are suggesting that the gap in their relative experience isn`t as big as it first appears is nonsense, karting has no comparison to aero cars and for James to adapt and achieve success in less than 2 years compared to Deans 5 or 6 years is remarkable. We only need to think back to Lewis`s first year in Renault to see how hard it is, even someone of his brilliance.Isn`t it strange why Lewis never won the award? Perhaps he was seen to be the driver at that time who looks the most likely to make it. If it is true what you say and James and Dean were close in all the tests, not just the driving, James should have been the clear choice but as previously stated and if it`s all about winning the award, it`s unfortunate that James is already good enough to attract sponsorship and maybe the selection process was clouded due to this. In answer to your last sentence, I strongly believe that the award should be offered to first time candidates only, it`s great for any driver to gain the nomination but not right to be in competition with drivers who have been and failed before.Perhaps they should select a complete line up of veterans to make it fair so not to be ignored. I say good luck to both Dean and James and the other 2009 candidates, I know who my moneys on. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
McLAREN YOUNG DRIVER AWARDS | rocketrobtvr | Trackside | 7 | 10 Sep 2002 21:21 |
McLAREN Young Driver Awards | rocketrobtvr | Marshals Forum | 8 | 9 Sep 2002 07:36 |
McLaren Autosport BRDC Young Driver | FEUsmart | National & Club Racing | 2 | 7 Dec 2000 21:40 |