|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Jun 2014, 23:26 (Ref:3424748) | #26 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
I'll put the dvr to record the race for the first hours,I don't have my hopes up for this race and expect lots of commercials and cautions.it will be cool to see what kind of speed the dps will carry with the updated aero and hp,but the walls are close in some sections and with that many cars and from what I have seen in previous grand am races there,it's going to be a crash fest.i just hope no one takes out the gtlm or gtd leaders. |
|||
|
22 Jun 2014, 01:02 (Ref:3424764) | #27 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 449
|
I'm predicting a full race time (2h 45m) run behind the safety car, and 2 1/2 hours of the broadcast time being commercials, advertising, or pointless bits no one cares about (basically advertising in disguise)
Probably won't even be able to watch though. Oh yes, how could I forget? The DP cars will still outclass the P2s. |
||
|
22 Jun 2014, 01:35 (Ref:3424776) | #28 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Yes I think it was Garcia in the SDR #90 and Yacaman in the Oak (her got quite a reputation for wrecking Telmex cars in Rolex before this) who were really pushing hard early----most think there was a some blocking on Garcia's part and some determined aggression from Yacaman (most who knew him form Rolex were probably as surprised as I he kept the car whole.)
Then Brundle got in and surprised almost everyone with his foolish attempt to force past Westbrook in the Corkscrew---though Westbrook was driving pretty defensively too. Thing is Garcia and Brundle did get penalized for their more egregious maneuvers---as it should be. At Detroit I think it was Ricky Taylor who crashed into the #90 to get the lead, then his brother Jordan got into it with Barbosa in the #5 AXR on the last lap and no one seemed to care. |
|
|
22 Jun 2014, 02:28 (Ref:3424786) | #29 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 901
|
I don't remember seeing anything "dirty" from #90 at Laguna Seca.. Yeah it ran the OAK car wide at turn 5 which was unnecessary, but running cars off is nothing new for Laguna Seca, it happens a few times every year and they got their penalty for it. There was no moving in the braking zones or late reactionary blocks that I remember seeing. Given that they knew/felt it was a P2 track and that their only chance was to keep the OAK car behind, I would have expected anyone in a DP car to do the same.
Kinda makes me wonder if the roles had been reversed, would people be calling the OAK car dirty or complimenting the stout defense put up to keep the DP behind it? Garcia is in the #3 Corvette now, his second year not in a DP. Valiante is in with Westy in the #90. Also for the comment a few above I fail to see how contact "belongs to sprint cars" when sprint cars are open wheel cars and contact results in a flip or broken front end 90% of the time. I think at the Glen we will see a DP take it again. The first part of the track up to the chicane should favor the DP pretty heavily and with their straight line advantage overtakes into the chicane should be pretty easy. Would think the P2 would be faster on the second half of the track but at that point they would already be behind the DP so the DP can just keep it defensive and hold them there. Mainly looking forward to the GTE battle, it should be the real show. |
|
|
22 Jun 2014, 03:08 (Ref:3424791) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
I think he was referring to Sprint Cup, not actual sprint cars.
I don't think a P2 is capable of putting up the same level of defense. The DPs are bigger, and weigh 300lb more. You do the math. We saw the damage to the #42, and how well the #5 soaked up the impact, not to mention, what a number even an indirect whack did to the #70 in that same incident. Some of what I saw from the #90 is definitely more than what I would call a "stout defense". Also, that move by the #2 HPD was the only straight-up pass I saw a P2 stick and hold on a DP at Laguna Seca. I think the two types of cars will be fairly close on lap times at Watkins Glen, but yes, that run from Turn 1 to the Inner Loop will be a killer for the P2s, especially if the DPs can run Turn 2 flat-out. It's not just long; most of it is uphill, too. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
22 Jun 2014, 11:34 (Ref:3424904) | #31 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Thanks for correcting me on the drivers---Valiante was indeed in the 90.
My point was and is, both cars were penalized for avoidable contact at Laguna. The one major block Valiante threw (while Yacaman was in the car, early in the first stint) was called, though not until later, and Brundle was penalized for his over-optimistic (read: crazy, foolish) maneuver. I worry that if enough contact is ignored, more will be attempted, that's all. If the frist pass at Detroit had been called, maybe the second incident wouldn't have happened---bt TUSC is balancing audience appeal against racing rules, I understand. It is Not an easy call to make. And yes, realistically DPs will win at Watkins Glen. And probably everywhere else on the schedule. I knew that before Daytona. I still hope for a fair fight, though. Who wins only matters if the racing is fair. |
|
|
22 Jun 2014, 12:29 (Ref:3424916) | #32 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,869
|
At Laguna both drivers of the 90 were blocking the OAK car until they crashed. It was egregious and I can't believe race control let them get away with that stuff.
|
|
|
22 Jun 2014, 15:49 (Ref:3424979) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Well, I think the P2s also stand a reasonable chance of winning at Mosport. Remember the duel between Jon Field and the de Ferran Acura in the opening laps of the 2009 race?
|
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
23 Jun 2014, 03:44 (Ref:3425176) | #34 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
|||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
23 Jun 2014, 04:35 (Ref:3425191) | #35 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
I know, but think of it this way. The Intersport Lola B06/10 AER with those insane air restrictors represents the DP, and the de Ferran Acura ARX-02a is the P2 in the scenario. So, you have brute power against better aero and a more advanced chassis. Also, while Field was even on weight, or at most, 40kg lighter, the P2s are 300lb (136kg) lighter than the DPs.
The balance issue is another reason why I wish we could see the Prototypes at VIR this year. Like Watkins Glen, it has a real mix of things, and I think some of the lead-ins to some of the fastest sections would actually favor the P2s even more. Well, I just want a reasonably close race at Watkins Glen, with as little contact as possible, and minimal abuse of the paved run-offs. We'll just have to see. Last edited by Purist; 23 Jun 2014 at 04:41. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
23 Jun 2014, 15:48 (Ref:3425459) | #36 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,078
|
I still think a P2 could win, if they can just get to that chicane. Because from there, the advantage will swing the other way, the boot should give the p2 cars a boost there.
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 16:19 (Ref:3425471) | #37 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
Btw those are bulletins for all IMSA series so the total count isn't technically that high. |
||
|
23 Jun 2014, 22:20 (Ref:3425628) | #38 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 429
|
Well the Viper started the year off much heavier than it had been in Le Mans last year, and seems to have gone up and down all year in terms of weight: 1280, 1250, 1265 and back down to the 1250 similar to Le Mans last year (1255).
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 22:28 (Ref:3425632) | #39 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,394
|
Yeah, im confused by that statement. You sure its not bmw youre talking about Chiana? Every other car bar the Ferrari is brand new. Vette and Ferrari have D-I, better fuel economy. Porsche is 1225kg+ same size restrictors as the just updated Viper size. Viper was 1265kg and the 458 is 1230kg. Bmw has 29.8x2 restrictors, roof level rear wing and 1245kg. Viper is 29.6x2, -25mm rear wing and 1250kg. A comparable car is the Vette. Big engine fr, 1245kg, 29.2x2, -25mm rear wing.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 01:04 (Ref:3425675) | #40 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Aren't the Porsche 991s direct-injected as well?
It seems odd to me that the BMW would be heavier than the Ferrari. The spec sheets I've found are also kind of interesting in what they show: Ferrari 458 GT2 Power- 465hp Torque- 384ft-lb BMW Z4 GTE Power- 480hp Torque- 354ft-lb It's not really what I would have expected, with the BMW having a lower-revving V8, while the Ferrari just wails by comparison. Any idea what the settings were on the Risi Ferrari when it won at VIR last year? |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
24 Jun 2014, 02:22 (Ref:3425699) | #41 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
No direct injection in the 991's. They are still running the 997 engine. They didn't want to develop the road going 991 engine for race because the new GT engine regulations were not set. GT convergence called off but engines rules and sonic restrictors just might be the same for the next few years so Porsche are probably working on it.
It's ironic that they're isn't a single car in the GTE field but the Ferrari that is running an engine by the books. Porsche holding onto the 997 motor. Corvette don't want to waste money to debore/stroke the 6.2 Liter in the stingray so they got a waiver ("hey everyone else has one") for the old C6R engine but added direct injection because the engine block had been ported that way anyway. The Z4 with the M3 V8... Viper and the 50 liter V10...Aston...laugh:. With regards to rules, the class is in shambles. Fortunately the racing trumps all. The BMW probably gets more weight because it has more aero than the other cars. Also in terms of performance balancing, the RLL team has performed a lot better than Risi this year...It's imsa attempt to reign the cars in a bit. |
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 05:30 (Ref:3425720) | #42 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,394
|
There are no engine size rules. Viper's engine is fine. The size limit was put in place when Vette dropped from gt1. That was a long time ago so theyre just fine. Even the 458 ran a width that was too wide when introduced. So it too had something that was out of the rules.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 12:42 (Ref:3425887) | #43 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
5.4.1 The displacement is 5500 cc maximum |
|||
|
24 Jun 2014, 14:14 (Ref:3425934) | #44 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Them having illegal engine never bothered me as much as the fact that their base restrictor sizes are not corresponding with the base restrictor table...
http://tentenths.com/forum/showpost....4&postcount=39 ... which almost makes it bigger waiver than the actual capacity break |
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 18:30 (Ref:3426003) | #45 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,690
|
I didn't notice this earlier, but it appears Qualifying now has streaming coverage online. In the IMSA email today it said:
Quote:
|
|||
|
24 Jun 2014, 19:17 (Ref:3426015) | #46 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
Yes in theory the 5.5 rule is still there, but it seems that SRT can't or don't want to destroke the 8.0 V10, so is better to give a waiver than lose a manufacturer...
After all until early 2013, the engine of a GTE had to be same block of the derivated street car, BMW entered with the Z4 powered by the same s65 of the GT3 Z4, and the rule was changed... If you ask to me, 458 GT is the only car that didn't reiceve any waiver and bop helps. |
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 20:12 (Ref:3426030) | #47 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,109
|
There really is not much to disucss pre race because you can't predict what will happen. GTE is wide open between 10 cars who have a legit chance to win. Plus having the red Dodge Vipers brings a fresh new look to the battle so I hope Fox spends most of their coverage on this class. It's ok we can stand to see a little less of DP cars running around.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 20:16 (Ref:3426032) | #48 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
|||
|
24 Jun 2014, 21:06 (Ref:3426044) | #49 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,394
|
||
|
24 Jun 2014, 23:16 (Ref:3426076) | #50 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Well, isn't the Viper GTE downsized from the 8.4-litre already? Also, I was thinking that the V8 in the Z4 GT3/GTE originally came out of the M5.
|
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FRC 2014 - TUSC Round 6: Watkins Glen | joeb | Predictions Competitions | 18 | 4 Jul 2014 15:17 |
IMSA Race TUSC Round 2: The Mobil 1 12 Hours of Sebring | joeb | North American Racing | 1452 | 21 Mar 2014 19:34 |
FRC 2014 - TUSC Round 2: 12 Hours of Sebring | joeb | Predictions Competitions | 28 | 17 Mar 2014 22:10 |
FRC 2014 - TUSC Round 1: 24 Hours of Daytona | joeb | Predictions Competitions | 45 | 13 Feb 2014 22:45 |