Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 May 2002, 18:26 (Ref:300661)   #1
PhilThomas
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
PhilThomas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Packers on F1 cars

Hi, when setting ride heights for F1 cars, how do packers come into play? For an example, if we started with a RH of 3.5 f : 4.1 r (cm's) and we wanted to lower that using packers, what is the logic? Do we add the packers symetrically? If we want to take off 1 cm from the front and back, do we add 1 cm of packers to the f/b? Also, what does the measurement for springs mean when it is 170 N/mm?? what is the 'N'? Hopefully my questions make sense to you all!
PhilThomas is offline  
Quote
Old 30 May 2002, 19:04 (Ref:300687)   #2
Barry Pomfret
Racer
 
Barry Pomfret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Milton Keynes
Posts: 318
Barry Pomfret should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
N is a measurement of force, it stands for Newtons. Most springs however are rated in pounds per inch.
Barry Pomfret is offline  
Quote
Old 30 May 2002, 19:50 (Ref:300724)   #3
PhilThomas
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
PhilThomas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
aah, I see. Thanks for the help on that part!
PhilThomas is offline  
Quote
Old 31 May 2002, 02:22 (Ref:300993)   #4
Jukebox
Veteran
 
Jukebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Malaysia
KL
Posts: 2,212
Jukebox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Packers on F1 cars

Usually on an F1 car ride height, the rear would be around 20+mm higher than the front. When setting the ride height, you must also take notice of the underboard plank's height too.

Once the ride height of the car had been set, the packers on the front and rear are set separately. It all depends on how stiff the springs are.

If the springs are softly sprung - set the packers to about 3 or 4mm less than the ride height.

If the springs are stiff - set the packers to about 1 or 2mm less than the ride height.
Jukebox is offline  
__________________
more hors3epower
Quote
Old 31 May 2002, 02:39 (Ref:300997)   #5
PhilThomas
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
PhilThomas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Aha!!! Light at the end of the tunnel!! thanks Jukebox!!
PhilThomas is offline  
Quote
Old 31 May 2002, 10:02 (Ref:301219)   #6
av8rirl
Veteran
 
av8rirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Ireland
Ireland
Posts: 1,168
av8rirl should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Packers??? What are packers???
av8rirl is offline  
__________________
Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional.
Quote
Old 31 May 2002, 15:28 (Ref:301627)   #7
PhilThomas
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
PhilThomas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
After having re-read your post Jukebox, how can only a 2 to 3 mm change have any effect on the ride height when adding/removing the packers? Are you sure you didn't mean 20 to 30 mm?
PhilThomas is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jun 2002, 01:47 (Ref:303113)   #8
Jukebox
Veteran
 
Jukebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Malaysia
KL
Posts: 2,212
Jukebox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
You should have read carefully Phil, 2 to 3mm less than the ride height...means if your ride height is at 46mm (rear) then the packers should be set at 43mm (that is only if the springs are 900lbs/less).

Set the springs first, then the ride height and then only the packers.

Springs settings depends much on which circuit you are racing, here are some tips on springs and the ride height required.

Softer springs
More grip from the tyres
Less tyre wear
Higher ride height required
Less responsive handling

Harder springs
Quicker, more responsive handling
Lower grip from the tyres
Greater tyre wear
Lower ride height required
Jukebox is offline  
__________________
more hors3epower
Quote
Old 3 Jun 2002, 02:40 (Ref:303128)   #9
PhilThomas
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
PhilThomas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Hahahaha oh boy did I laugh hard when I read your post jukebox! I really should have read it closer! Sorry about that but I'm so new to the technical side of racing that I've been looking over numerous boards and reading as many articles as possible to learn as much as I can, as fast as I can. I didn't read it close enough. Thanks for the correction though!
PhilThomas is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jun 2002, 02:53 (Ref:303129)   #10
Jukebox
Veteran
 
Jukebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Malaysia
KL
Posts: 2,212
Jukebox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No worries Phil, i do make mistakes at times and had to be corrected too in here. Anyway do check the anti-roll bars, brake balance and damper settings (if it's in the game) too everytime you change the ride height. Have fun with the PS2 game
Jukebox is offline  
__________________
more hors3epower
Quote
Old 3 Jun 2002, 04:05 (Ref:303140)   #11
PhilThomas
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
PhilThomas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I don't have a ps2, I play f1 2001/2 and GPL on the pc. All the different bits of the car to tweak...it's a little overwhelming. Touch one thing you throw another out of whack. The fun is in the learning though. I've bought 2 books, tweak to win and drive to win by Carroll Smith. I hope to go to racing school soon too, but I know I will never be a pro, I'm too tall. (6'2") At least, I'm too tall for open wheel racers (my fav)

I need a mechanic for these games, they are very in depth and nothing to sneeze at.

Last edited by PhilThomas; 3 Jun 2002 at 04:06.
PhilThomas is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jun 2002, 08:03 (Ref:305044)   #12
Jukebox
Veteran
 
Jukebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Malaysia
KL
Posts: 2,212
Jukebox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by av8rirl
Packers??? What are packers???
Quite difficult to explain in words...hmmm i'll try

It's a part of the suspension assemblage and it's located when one want to adjust the position of the bump rubbers when it's loaded.
Jukebox is offline  
__________________
more hors3epower
Quote
Old 5 Jun 2002, 14:10 (Ref:305317)   #13
av8rirl
Veteran
 
av8rirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Ireland
Ireland
Posts: 1,168
av8rirl should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Adjust the height of the bump stops?
av8rirl is offline  
__________________
Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional.
Quote
Old 6 Jun 2002, 02:15 (Ref:305924)   #14
Jukebox
Veteran
 
Jukebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Malaysia
KL
Posts: 2,212
Jukebox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Usually for qualifying sessions, packers are not used because it'll reduce speed but the underboard planks will suffer most without them if not used on raceday.

That is one of the reasons why we don see cars doing faster laps during the race as they did during qualifying because when they use packers, it'll reduce the car's speed.

Packers are used to save the planks from wear, especially when taking corners. The packer's job is to stabilize the plank while the springs do it's job. In a long straights, occasionaly we can see planks touching the track..that's because the packers are not in use because it works together with the springs whereby it's a part of the suspension.

I think i have explain it correctly....
Jukebox is offline  
__________________
more hors3epower
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wish list of cars to be made to gt1 cars slicktsax Sportscar & GT Racing 24 6 Oct 2005 09:02
GP 2 cars are approximately 3 secs faster than the F3000 cars Frank_White National & International Single Seaters 18 5 Nov 2004 23:06
IMSA GTP cars should have been 2,000+ horsepower cars Green Monster North American Racing 29 17 Jun 2004 01:20
F1 Safety Cars / Medical Cars Mark Stevens Formula One 8 21 May 2004 18:10
2003 Touring cars - what predictions for teams and cars (and colours!!) adamp_uk Touring Car Racing 16 17 Oct 2002 20:12


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:20.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.