|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
30 May 2002, 18:26 (Ref:300661) | #1 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
|
Packers on F1 cars
Hi, when setting ride heights for F1 cars, how do packers come into play? For an example, if we started with a RH of 3.5 f : 4.1 r (cm's) and we wanted to lower that using packers, what is the logic? Do we add the packers symetrically? If we want to take off 1 cm from the front and back, do we add 1 cm of packers to the f/b? Also, what does the measurement for springs mean when it is 170 N/mm?? what is the 'N'? Hopefully my questions make sense to you all!
|
|
|
30 May 2002, 19:04 (Ref:300687) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 318
|
N is a measurement of force, it stands for Newtons. Most springs however are rated in pounds per inch.
|
||
|
30 May 2002, 19:50 (Ref:300724) | #3 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
|
aah, I see. Thanks for the help on that part!
|
|
|
31 May 2002, 02:22 (Ref:300993) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,212
|
Re: Packers on F1 cars
Usually on an F1 car ride height, the rear would be around 20+mm higher than the front. When setting the ride height, you must also take notice of the underboard plank's height too.
Once the ride height of the car had been set, the packers on the front and rear are set separately. It all depends on how stiff the springs are. If the springs are softly sprung - set the packers to about 3 or 4mm less than the ride height. If the springs are stiff - set the packers to about 1 or 2mm less than the ride height. |
||
__________________
more hors3epower |
31 May 2002, 02:39 (Ref:300997) | #5 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
|
Aha!!! Light at the end of the tunnel!! thanks Jukebox!!
|
|
|
31 May 2002, 10:02 (Ref:301219) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,168
|
Packers??? What are packers???
|
||
__________________
Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional. |
31 May 2002, 15:28 (Ref:301627) | #7 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
|
After having re-read your post Jukebox, how can only a 2 to 3 mm change have any effect on the ride height when adding/removing the packers? Are you sure you didn't mean 20 to 30 mm?
|
|
|
3 Jun 2002, 01:47 (Ref:303113) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,212
|
You should have read carefully Phil, 2 to 3mm less than the ride height...means if your ride height is at 46mm (rear) then the packers should be set at 43mm (that is only if the springs are 900lbs/less).
Set the springs first, then the ride height and then only the packers. Springs settings depends much on which circuit you are racing, here are some tips on springs and the ride height required. Softer springs More grip from the tyres Less tyre wear Higher ride height required Less responsive handling Harder springs Quicker, more responsive handling Lower grip from the tyres Greater tyre wear Lower ride height required |
||
__________________
more hors3epower |
3 Jun 2002, 02:40 (Ref:303128) | #9 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
|
Hahahaha oh boy did I laugh hard when I read your post jukebox! I really should have read it closer! Sorry about that but I'm so new to the technical side of racing that I've been looking over numerous boards and reading as many articles as possible to learn as much as I can, as fast as I can. I didn't read it close enough. Thanks for the correction though!
|
|
|
3 Jun 2002, 02:53 (Ref:303129) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,212
|
No worries Phil, i do make mistakes at times and had to be corrected too in here. Anyway do check the anti-roll bars, brake balance and damper settings (if it's in the game) too everytime you change the ride height. Have fun with the PS2 game
|
||
__________________
more hors3epower |
3 Jun 2002, 04:05 (Ref:303140) | #11 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 16
|
I don't have a ps2, I play f1 2001/2 and GPL on the pc. All the different bits of the car to tweak...it's a little overwhelming. Touch one thing you throw another out of whack. The fun is in the learning though. I've bought 2 books, tweak to win and drive to win by Carroll Smith. I hope to go to racing school soon too, but I know I will never be a pro, I'm too tall. (6'2") At least, I'm too tall for open wheel racers (my fav)
I need a mechanic for these games, they are very in depth and nothing to sneeze at. Last edited by PhilThomas; 3 Jun 2002 at 04:06. |
|
|
5 Jun 2002, 08:03 (Ref:305044) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,212
|
Quote:
It's a part of the suspension assemblage and it's located when one want to adjust the position of the bump rubbers when it's loaded. |
|||
__________________
more hors3epower |
5 Jun 2002, 14:10 (Ref:305317) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,168
|
Adjust the height of the bump stops?
|
||
__________________
Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional. |
6 Jun 2002, 02:15 (Ref:305924) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,212
|
Usually for qualifying sessions, packers are not used because it'll reduce speed but the underboard planks will suffer most without them if not used on raceday.
That is one of the reasons why we don see cars doing faster laps during the race as they did during qualifying because when they use packers, it'll reduce the car's speed. Packers are used to save the planks from wear, especially when taking corners. The packer's job is to stabilize the plank while the springs do it's job. In a long straights, occasionaly we can see planks touching the track..that's because the packers are not in use because it works together with the springs whereby it's a part of the suspension. I think i have explain it correctly.... |
||
__________________
more hors3epower |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
wish list of cars to be made to gt1 cars | slicktsax | Sportscar & GT Racing | 24 | 6 Oct 2005 09:02 |
GP 2 cars are approximately 3 secs faster than the F3000 cars | Frank_White | National & International Single Seaters | 18 | 5 Nov 2004 23:06 |
IMSA GTP cars should have been 2,000+ horsepower cars | Green Monster | North American Racing | 29 | 17 Jun 2004 01:20 |
F1 Safety Cars / Medical Cars | Mark Stevens | Formula One | 8 | 21 May 2004 18:10 |
2003 Touring cars - what predictions for teams and cars (and colours!!) | adamp_uk | Touring Car Racing | 16 | 17 Oct 2002 20:12 |