|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Jul 2018, 12:17 (Ref:3836287) | #1 | ||||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,302
|
The Hybrid/NA Engine Debate (moved from Future Rule Changes)
Quote:
Ok, this is the bit that I can't quite compute. If you take the current PUs they are running 100 litres for a 200 mile (approx) race. I may be off base here but that equates to around 8 MPG for the full race distance, which we know is also supported by the electrical power so I suspect they are much thirstier than that. Current, modern V8 production engines, as we know, can produce significant power for much less fuel usage using modern injection techniques compared to the old days. The cost of tuning a stock block to produce 800bhp would be much less than the cost of 20 million per unit and it would still not use more than 8 mpg but it would be lighter than the gubbins currently in the cars thus the cars would be dynamically better. Seems to me that is not "historic racing" but road relevant pinnacle of motorsport. Yes I realise the current PUs produce more than 800bhp but they are also significantly heavier than a V8. Quote:
I can't see why having those type of characters in the sport would be so wrong. Of course it's necver going to be cheap but in my opinion proper engines are far more fuel friendly per BHP than the current crop of PUs. |
||||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Rules] Future Rule Changes | Greem | Formula One | 4371 | 24 Apr 2024 09:52 |
New LMP2 engine - and (more) rule changes | ss_collins | Sportscar & GT Racing | 42 | 4 Oct 2008 14:49 |
F1 future rule changes | TheNewBob | Formula One | 57 | 20 Dec 2006 09:19 |
Sensible ideas for future technical regs anyone?/Rule changes - more to come [merged] | AMT | Formula One | 74 | 12 Nov 2002 16:09 |
Engine rule changes planned for 2003 | Mark F1 | Formula One | 47 | 16 Feb 2002 13:05 |