|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Sep 2004, 18:37 (Ref:1097521) | #1 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Kumho to F1?
http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=100832
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Sep 2004, 19:42 (Ref:1097571) | #2 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Lifted from last weeks Autosport, which covered the story extensively.
I believe we need one tyre manufacturer in F1, not three. |
|
|
15 Sep 2004, 20:09 (Ref:1097597) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
I'd rather see Yokohama or Goodyear in F1, to be honest...
|
|
|
15 Sep 2004, 20:20 (Ref:1097604) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
I agree with you K-B. Improvements on the tire side is why we have seen the lap times fall so dramatically during this period of rules stability. I'm all for competition and variety in Formula 1, but a single make of tire would provide a much better base for competition. This season would have probably been much different with one tire make.
|
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
15 Sep 2004, 20:27 (Ref:1097610) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
True, no tyrecompanies making tyres specifically for one team would level the playing field quite a bit.
Last edited by ASCII Man; 15 Sep 2004 at 20:27. |
|
|
15 Sep 2004, 20:45 (Ref:1097623) | #6 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Have Michelin supplying all the teams. Solves everything!
|
|
|
15 Sep 2004, 21:18 (Ref:1097662) | #7 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Exactly.
I'd put the tyre deal out to tender, and get a company to supply spec tyres to the whole field. It would eliminate the need for a whole lot of testing too. |
|
|
15 Sep 2004, 21:23 (Ref:1097667) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,409
|
Its great news that another tyre manufacturer is looking at F1.
|
||
|
15 Sep 2004, 21:45 (Ref:1097691) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,183
|
I heard that Kumho was interested in joining the CCWS?! Guess we'll have to wait and see.
|
||
__________________
Give them good ol' boys the chrome horn PT! |
15 Sep 2004, 21:46 (Ref:1097692) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
KumWHO? The biggest tyre manufacturer you've never heard of?
A company like ths could be good to be the sole supplier actually, because it would cut costs and cut speeds all at once. The only issue is whether they could make safe tyres? |
||
|
15 Sep 2004, 21:49 (Ref:1097695) | #11 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
They're one of the biggest tyre makers in the world and already supply Euroseries F3 and Japanese GT.
If they were a spec-tyre supplier to F1, it would be just as safe as any other manufacturer. |
|
|
15 Sep 2004, 23:14 (Ref:1097753) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
I dislike the notion of anything about F1 being 'spec', and I'm afraid I have to include tyres on that list. Bridgestone, Michelin, Kumho, Pirelli, Yokohama, Goodyear, Dunlop, Continental... come one, come all.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
15 Sep 2004, 23:22 (Ref:1097762) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,376
|
Quote:
There is nothing else spec about this series, so why should the tires be? And if the tires become spec, than whats next, and where do you stop? The more tire manufacturers the better. As a matter of fact, each team should have there own. That way, the tire manufacturer can work exclusively with just a single chassis/engine combo, and really get it right, something like Bridgestone does for Ferrari. |
|||
|
15 Sep 2004, 23:31 (Ref:1097768) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
I understand that sentiment. But, there isn't a tire manufacturer's title is there? Are we more concerned as to whether Williams can make a good car, or can Michelin make a good tire? Likewise, is the F2004 really as good as it seems, or is Bridgestone the one making the large jump?
Personally, I'm more interested in the cars and the drivers, as that is what Formula 1 places an emphasis on. And one tire manufacturer per team would be a bit costly I would think. |
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
16 Sep 2004, 01:17 (Ref:1097794) | #15 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 149
|
Fantastic, I say!
I totally disagree with the idea of 'spec' tyres in Formula One. It's supposed to be about competition after all. It's true that cornering speeds have become absurdly dangerous. But why scapegoat the tyre manufacturers? Take the wings off the cars!!! |
||
|
16 Sep 2004, 03:16 (Ref:1097835) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,767
|
I normally abhor the idea of "spec" components but tyres are one thing that should be one make.
I also applaude Kumho for having a go at nearly everything at the moment. They already make a very competent F3 tyre (Euroseries, German F3 and Korean Super Prix, Macau(?)) and are at least showing a level of interest in motorsport that is seriously lacking in some big companies. |
||
__________________
"...full of sound and fury, yet signifying nothing...." |
16 Sep 2004, 07:47 (Ref:1097913) | #17 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 403
|
How about as many tyre makers as teams? That would be awesome
|
||
|
16 Sep 2004, 08:25 (Ref:1097945) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 605
|
I'd like to see as many tyre companies as they can get. F1 is all about pushing the envelope why not rubber as well & if there were more brands they could specialise on teams better or if you want to level things up make the tyre companies have to offer the same tyres to all teams & let any team run any tyre they want at each race.
|
||
__________________
What's this for anyway? |
16 Sep 2004, 11:42 (Ref:1098149) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,332
|
Why do people like the idea of spec tires? I keep hearing to level the playing field... well, spec engines would do that, too! Or spec chassis. Or a spec driver!!!
I hope more tire manufacturers come to F1, and if a tyre championship evolves along with constructor and driver, then so be it! Right now, the WCC entries are names like 'BMW Williams' and 'McLaren Mercedes', why not 'BMW Williams Kumho' or 'McLaren Mercedes Michelin'??? |
||
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!! |
16 Sep 2004, 11:46 (Ref:1098152) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
I don't know much about Kumho apart from what they supply. Are they a big company the size of Michelin and Bridgestone? Can they afford season after season of supply in F1?
|
||
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! |
16 Sep 2004, 11:56 (Ref:1098162) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,622
|
I don't know if Kumho is big enough for a long term F1 effort but good on them if they have a go!
The Koreans are working very hard to catch up on Japan. |
||
|
16 Sep 2004, 12:12 (Ref:1098179) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,384
|
Whats peoples thoughts of the 94/95/96 seasons for example where goodyear supplied all.
Did that add/detract from the sport ? Do you feel good year supplied Williams/Benetton with their own tyres and the lower teams had to make say "williams spec" tyres work on there car ? I have to admit I don't think the tyres played as much a part in the racing in those years where it was more chassis/engine/driver, this year a duff can appears to get a turbo charged engine from the tyres. The racing at the moment seems all about the tyre. Its an interesting debate. Imagine if each team had its own tyre supplier williams = Michallin Ferrari = Bridgestone Mclaren = good year Sauber = Pirelli Jaguar = dunlop Toyota = Yokahama Jordon = Avon BAR = Continental Minardi = the flintstones that would be fair as it would be down to the team to work with its own tyre company to make a tyre that worked with the car - a real partnership, as opposed to "here sauber make this ferrari tyre work for you" |
||
|
16 Sep 2004, 13:25 (Ref:1098254) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,332
|
I find that whole "My times suffer horribly because the tires are designed for Ferrari and not me" line to be mostly .
Michelin don't cater their tires to Renault, McLaren, Williams, or BAR... They come to each race with a few compounds and let the teams decide which to use. The teams certainly have input and develop new tires through testing, but by and large what is an improvement for Team A is an improvement for Team B as well. |
||
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!! |
16 Sep 2004, 13:29 (Ref:1098260) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 556
|
I think that if the tyres were made to last the entire race distance (200ish miles isn't exactly far for one set is it?) then the different tyres would be a lot more closely matched and the harder compounds would encourace sliding and hence improve overtaking and the show in general.
I dont mind how many suppliers there are but I don't like the way Ferrari get special treatment over other Bridgestone teams so perhaps tyre testing should be limited - which would also save money. |
||
__________________
Ten reasons why I procrastinate: 1) |
16 Sep 2004, 15:22 (Ref:1098361) | #25 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
|
ain't gonna happen.
period. |
||
__________________
Why do people sing 'God save the Queen' when she hasen't done ANYTHING for them!?!? |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
kumho v70a | big andy | Racing Technology | 4 | 28 Nov 2004 16:30 |
[Diecast/Models] Model Kumho BMW | Steve Wood | Armchair Enthusiast | 10 | 30 Oct 2003 17:45 |
BMW kumho tyres championship | the_tsar | National & Club Racing | 4 | 11 Oct 2003 21:25 |
Kumho BMW Series | Craig | National & Club Racing | 2 | 7 Jul 2002 18:40 |
Kumho in F1 | Warwick | Formula One | 1 | 10 Jan 2001 09:02 |