Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 Sep 2004, 18:37 (Ref:1097521)   #1
Fogelhund
Veteran
 
Fogelhund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Canada
Binbrook, ON Canada
Posts: 6,958
Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!
Kumho to F1?

http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=100832

Quote:
Kumho, the South Korean tiremaker, has begun a Formula One feasibility study and might take a shot at Bridgestone and Michelin in 2007.
more at link.......
Fogelhund is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 19:42 (Ref:1097571)   #2
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Lifted from last weeks Autosport, which covered the story extensively.


I believe we need one tyre manufacturer in F1, not three.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 20:09 (Ref:1097597)   #3
ASCII Man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
ASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I'd rather see Yokohama or Goodyear in F1, to be honest...
ASCII Man is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 20:20 (Ref:1097604)   #4
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I agree with you K-B. Improvements on the tire side is why we have seen the lap times fall so dramatically during this period of rules stability. I'm all for competition and variety in Formula 1, but a single make of tire would provide a much better base for competition. This season would have probably been much different with one tire make.
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 20:27 (Ref:1097610)   #5
ASCII Man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
ASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
True, no tyrecompanies making tyres specifically for one team would level the playing field quite a bit.

Last edited by ASCII Man; 15 Sep 2004 at 20:27.
ASCII Man is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 20:45 (Ref:1097623)   #6
Knowlesy
20KPINAL
 
Knowlesy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
Knowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameKnowlesy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Have Michelin supplying all the teams. Solves everything!
Knowlesy is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 21:18 (Ref:1097662)   #7
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Exactly.

I'd put the tyre deal out to tender, and get a company to supply spec tyres to the whole field.

It would eliminate the need for a whole lot of testing too.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 21:23 (Ref:1097667)   #8
esorniloc
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
England
Posts: 1,409
esorniloc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Its great news that another tyre manufacturer is looking at F1.
esorniloc is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 21:45 (Ref:1097691)   #9
Dov
Veteran
 
Dov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Canada
Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,183
Dov should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I heard that Kumho was interested in joining the CCWS?! Guess we'll have to wait and see.
Dov is offline  
__________________
Give them good ol' boys the chrome horn PT!
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 21:46 (Ref:1097692)   #10
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
KumWHO? The biggest tyre manufacturer you've never heard of?

A company like ths could be good to be the sole supplier actually, because it would cut costs and cut speeds all at once. The only issue is whether they could make safe tyres?
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 21:49 (Ref:1097695)   #11
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
They're one of the biggest tyre makers in the world and already supply Euroseries F3 and Japanese GT.

If they were a spec-tyre supplier to F1, it would be just as safe as any other manufacturer.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 23:14 (Ref:1097753)   #12
BSchneiderFan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
United Kingdom
London, UK
Posts: 5,721
BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!
I dislike the notion of anything about F1 being 'spec', and I'm afraid I have to include tyres on that list. Bridgestone, Michelin, Kumho, Pirelli, Yokohama, Goodyear, Dunlop, Continental... come one, come all.
BSchneiderFan is offline  
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?"
Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..."
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 23:22 (Ref:1097762)   #13
GP Racer
Veteran
 
GP Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
United States
"The Big Apple"
Posts: 3,376
GP Racer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridGP Racer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by BSchneiderFan
I dislike the notion of anything about F1 being 'spec', and I'm afraid I have to include tyres on that list. Bridgestone, Michelin, Kumho, Pirelli, Yokohama, Goodyear, Dunlop, Continental... come one, come all.
I fully agree.

There is nothing else spec about this series, so why should the tires be? And if the tires become spec, than whats next, and where do you stop?

The more tire manufacturers the better. As a matter of fact, each team should have there own. That way, the tire manufacturer can work exclusively with just a single chassis/engine combo, and really get it right, something like Bridgestone does for Ferrari.
GP Racer is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Sep 2004, 23:31 (Ref:1097768)   #14
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I understand that sentiment. But, there isn't a tire manufacturer's title is there? Are we more concerned as to whether Williams can make a good car, or can Michelin make a good tire? Likewise, is the F2004 really as good as it seems, or is Bridgestone the one making the large jump?

Personally, I'm more interested in the cars and the drivers, as that is what Formula 1 places an emphasis on.

And one tire manufacturer per team would be a bit costly I would think.
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 01:17 (Ref:1097794)   #15
Fuzzyfelt
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Belfast
Posts: 149
Fuzzyfelt should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Fantastic, I say!

I totally disagree with the idea of 'spec' tyres in Formula One. It's supposed to be about competition after all.

It's true that cornering speeds have become absurdly dangerous. But why scapegoat the tyre manufacturers? Take the wings off the cars!!!
Fuzzyfelt is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 03:16 (Ref:1097835)   #16
Chucky
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Australia
Port Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,767
Chucky should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I normally abhor the idea of "spec" components but tyres are one thing that should be one make.

I also applaude Kumho for having a go at nearly everything at the moment. They already make a very competent F3 tyre (Euroseries, German F3 and Korean Super Prix, Macau(?)) and are at least showing a level of interest in motorsport that is seriously lacking in some big companies.
Chucky is offline  
__________________
"...full of sound and fury, yet signifying nothing...."
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 07:47 (Ref:1097913)   #17
CleanTone
Racer
 
CleanTone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Romania
Colentina
Posts: 403
CleanTone should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
How about as many tyre makers as teams? That would be awesome
CleanTone is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 08:25 (Ref:1097945)   #18
MRJUCY
Veteran
 
MRJUCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Australia
At the pub
Posts: 605
MRJUCY should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'd like to see as many tyre companies as they can get. F1 is all about pushing the envelope why not rubber as well & if there were more brands they could specialise on teams better or if you want to level things up make the tyre companies have to offer the same tyres to all teams & let any team run any tyre they want at each race.
MRJUCY is offline  
__________________
What's this for anyway?
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 11:42 (Ref:1098149)   #19
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Why do people like the idea of spec tires? I keep hearing to level the playing field... well, spec engines would do that, too! Or spec chassis. Or a spec driver!!!

I hope more tire manufacturers come to F1, and if a tyre championship evolves along with constructor and driver, then so be it! Right now, the WCC entries are names like 'BMW Williams' and 'McLaren Mercedes', why not 'BMW Williams Kumho' or 'McLaren Mercedes Michelin'???
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 11:46 (Ref:1098152)   #20
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I don't know much about Kumho apart from what they supply. Are they a big company the size of Michelin and Bridgestone? Can they afford season after season of supply in F1?
f1manoz is offline  
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die!
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 11:56 (Ref:1098162)   #21
Morris 1100
Veteran
 
Morris 1100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Here.
Posts: 1,622
Morris 1100 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I don't know if Kumho is big enough for a long term F1 effort but good on them if they have a go!

The Koreans are working very hard to catch up on Japan.
Morris 1100 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 12:12 (Ref:1098179)   #22
darcym
Veteran
 
darcym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Bath
Posts: 1,384
darcym should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Whats peoples thoughts of the 94/95/96 seasons for example where goodyear supplied all.

Did that add/detract from the sport ?

Do you feel good year supplied Williams/Benetton with their own tyres and the lower teams had to make say "williams spec" tyres work on there car ?

I have to admit I don't think the tyres played as much a part in the racing in those years where it was more chassis/engine/driver, this year a duff can appears to get a turbo charged engine from the tyres. The racing at the moment seems all about the tyre.

Its an interesting debate.


Imagine if each team had its own tyre supplier

williams = Michallin
Ferrari = Bridgestone
Mclaren = good year
Sauber = Pirelli
Jaguar = dunlop
Toyota = Yokahama
Jordon = Avon
BAR = Continental
Minardi = the flintstones

that would be fair as it would be down to the team to work with its own tyre company to make a tyre that worked with the car - a real partnership, as opposed to "here sauber make this ferrari tyre work for you"
darcym is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 13:25 (Ref:1098254)   #23
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I find that whole "My times suffer horribly because the tires are designed for Ferrari and not me" line to be mostly .

Michelin don't cater their tires to Renault, McLaren, Williams, or BAR... They come to each race with a few compounds and let the teams decide which to use. The teams certainly have input and develop new tires through testing, but by and large what is an improvement for Team A is an improvement for Team B as well.
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 13:29 (Ref:1098260)   #24
T0MAT01
Veteran
 
T0MAT01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
England
Focknowles Weir
Posts: 556
T0MAT01 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think that if the tyres were made to last the entire race distance (200ish miles isn't exactly far for one set is it?) then the different tyres would be a lot more closely matched and the harder compounds would encourace sliding and hence improve overtaking and the show in general.

I dont mind how many suppliers there are but I don't like the way Ferrari get special treatment over other Bridgestone teams so perhaps tyre testing should be limited - which would also save money.
T0MAT01 is offline  
__________________
Ten reasons why I procrastinate:
1)
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2004, 15:22 (Ref:1098361)   #25
BIGMOUTH
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
West Midlands, England
Posts: 125
BIGMOUTH should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
ain't gonna happen.

period.
BIGMOUTH is offline  
__________________
Why do people sing 'God save the Queen' when she hasen't done ANYTHING for them!?!?
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kumho v70a big andy Racing Technology 4 28 Nov 2004 16:30
[Diecast/Models] Model Kumho BMW Steve Wood Armchair Enthusiast 10 30 Oct 2003 17:45
BMW kumho tyres championship the_tsar National & Club Racing 4 11 Oct 2003 21:25
Kumho BMW Series Craig National & Club Racing 2 7 Jul 2002 18:40
Kumho in F1 Warwick Formula One 1 10 Jan 2001 09:02


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.