Triple 8 Splitter Eligibility - Still Going.. (Merged x2)

[ForumNick]

Hmmm...

The way I read it was that the aspersions against Mr Little were made by the 'Protester' (TW) rather then the 'Protestee' (T8)

Quote:
"The integrity of Campbell Little, who was the Category Technical Director when the Winton event occurred, was also questioned in the protest but the Stewards today declared he acted correctly.

“We find that the CTD acted correctly, having reached a decision (with the assistance of a delegated Technical Officer) so there was no need for him to refer the matter further to either the IPO or Stewards,” the Stewards wrote in their findings."

[mememe]

The protester being 888. So GTRmagic is saying if 888 have there doubts about Mr Little, why would Mr Little want to work with them (888) in the future.

[peckstar]

“We find that the protester (Walkinshaw Performance) has failed to establish which components were used by cars #1 and #888 in race five at Winton,” the decision read.

its in the press release, but maybe its been updated

[ForumNick]

Originally Posted by mememe

The protester being 888. So GTRmagic is saying if 888 have there doubts about Mr Little, why would Mr Little want to work with them (888) in the future.

NO!
The part of the (linked) article where the integrity of Mr Little was mentioned, was clearly referring to the final determination of the original 'splittergate' protest (by Walkinshaw Performance)!

[rdmdog]

I was under the assumption that the item has been fitted to the 888 Falcon for a little while, with the previous CTD (Steve Brow) giving the OK, hence Little not entering into the discussion once he joined as CTD?

I may be wrong, maybe........