Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Clubmans Rallycross Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Other Motorsports > Rallying & Rallycross

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 Feb 2007, 19:00 (Ref:1841534)   #51
Roundy Mooney
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Ireland
Posts: 553
Roundy Mooney should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Lowe
No one complains about O'Donovans 306 thats not allowed in Europe but still races here.

I think you will find (and I'm open to correction) that O'Donavans 306 and Jobbs Escort were not going to be allowed run in the RSS Originally but it is amazing what a lack of entries will do for changing peoples minds on rules.
Roundy Mooney is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 19:11 (Ref:1841539)   #52
Guffy
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
United Kingdom
Shap Cumbria
Posts: 291
Guffy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ok put all div 1/supercars that isn't to European Regs in the revivals class..! Ok that would have only left Mad Marks Xsara, but hey hoe there you go..!
Guffy is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 19:13 (Ref:1841541)   #53
chunder
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
England
Stevenage
Posts: 8,298
chunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Precisely!!

As said earlier, amazing what lack of entries does for peoples minds, maybe they should think of not having race meeitngs in the middle of winter!!
chunder is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 19:17 (Ref:1841542)   #54
shhh
Veteran
 
shhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Ireland
Posts: 919
shhh has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roundy Mooney
I think you will find (and I'm open to correction) that O'Donavans 306 and Jobbs Escort were not going to be allowed run in the RSS Originally but it is amazing what a lack of entries will do for changing peoples minds on rules.
Very true, goalposts were changed due to lack of entries in the RSS
shhh is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 19:42 (Ref:1841560)   #55
Chessmsport
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
England
Eastbourne
Posts: 259
Chessmsport should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Lowe
No one complains about O'Donovans 306 thats not allowed in Europe but still races here.
The 306 is still homologated for the ERC but that particular car is not eligble for technical reasons. Also Jobbs Escort could be used in Eurpoe if entered as RS2000 but again is not allowed because I believe its bulkhead is modified.

Quote:
Originally Posted by leonidas
Plus you can add 4 years to it to run in the ERC

We have the best supported Div1/Supercar car class in Europe several national championships only have 2 or 3 cars so I guess we can consider ourselves lucky.

Last edited by Chessmsport; 14 Feb 2007 at 19:52.
Chessmsport is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 21:06 (Ref:1841631)   #56
Barrie
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
England
Colchester Essex
Posts: 935
Barrie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
With two rounds of the ERC up for grabs there's a real chance of getting the British ERC round back if rallycross organises pull together, alot of members on this forum may not have attended Lydden in the ERC days, think Easter Monday x 10 for excitement and spectacle, though Croft would probably be looked at as a more serious venue. It dosent look great seeing a RS200 and 1 or 2 6R4's on the entry when FIA may well be looking at Britain as a contender for a round.
Barrie is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 21:38 (Ref:1841667)   #57
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrie
It dosent look great seeing a RS200 and 1 or 2 6R4's on the entry when FIA may well be looking at Britain as a contender for a round.

Totally disagree there Barrie, as we all know a ERC round wouldnt have Group B cars in it and if a round in Britain was to be held the venues would be looked at not the cars.

We already have cars that are new and could contest ERC events so the bit about Group B cars shouldn't even come into it
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 21:54 (Ref:1841684)   #58
chris cake
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
England
LYDDEN HILL
Posts: 370
chris cake should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunder
Precisely!!

As said earlier, amazing what lack of entries does for peoples minds, maybe they should think of not having race meeitngs in the middle of winter!!
There was no lack of entries at all this is not true!
In the beginning Rallycross was a winter sport ! Thats the trouble most people have forgoten this major point . The many entries we had about 70 really injoyed their day .
chris cake is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 21:56 (Ref:1841688)   #59
Barrie
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
England
Colchester Essex
Posts: 935
Barrie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
But there mixed in with the Div 1 machinery, the RPL team have asked FIA what needs to be done to reclaim a ERC round, simply get inline with ERC regs that is happening , personally I love the Group B cars, historic classes are a more viable option. Saying all that we should get a ERC round automatically for inventing the sport and the home of rallycross Lydden should be the venue.
Barrie is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2007, 22:12 (Ref:1841697)   #60
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I do agree tha we need another ERC round and my last ne spectating was at Croft when Schanche pushed Pallier over (I have the pics) but I think th FIA would require a bit more than (dont run group B with Div 1 cars) as this is our own domestic championship.

An event like the Superprix would be the best bet for a ERC round as its a stand alone event and its at one if not thee fastest rallycross circuits in Britain
CROFT FOR ERC event
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 08:28 (Ref:1841937)   #61
Mad Mark Watson
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
England
barnard castle
Posts: 277
Mad Mark Watson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guffy
Ok put all div 1/supercars that isn't to European Regs in the revivals class..! Ok that would have only left Mad Marks Xsara, but hey hoe there you go..!
[PHP][PHP]
May as well join in, can i just say that reason i bought xsara was it was a modern car and able to run in europe thinking the BRC would be along same lines so both were same. Was a little surprised when rolled out at Lydden to find 6R4's still here after a break from the sport of 10 years. I love Rallycross and hate the fact that it has not exploded like some other championships and not become as prolific. My view is that we need to field modern cars to make public recognise the vehicles we run and see if we can get more manufaturer involvement.
I for my part will do everything to bring sponsors into sport and publicise events and put on a professional show that will make public, spectators and viewers realise that Rallycross is going forward and be up there with the best forms of motorsport.]
Mad Mark Watson is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 10:51 (Ref:1842004)   #62
leonidas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
England
Coventry
Posts: 1,286
leonidas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridleonidas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think there are really two issues here...

1. How do we get an ERC round back?

A. Encourage as many competitors to go to full Div. 1 spec. You could do this by allowing all supercars to run together but only allow full Div. 1 cars to score MSA championship points. That way the public spectacle is still there but the ERC organisers know that the BRC is fully committed to a 'European parity' future.

2. How to improve the presentation of the sport to tv networks and motorsport opinion formers?

A. This is more about the presentation of the cars. If people present cars at scrutineering that look a mess they should be warned and on second offense sent home. A bit of paint and new bumpers/doors from the scapyard don't cost a lot even in budget series. You could also announce that by say 2012 all cars in the MSA series must be no more than four years beyond the end of homologation. That would give everyone 5 years (at least) with their current machinery and plenty of time to plan new cars / reshells. Non-homologated to run in revivals or BTRDA.

Last edited by leonidas; 15 Feb 2007 at 10:54.
leonidas is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 12:23 (Ref:1842084)   #63
silver bullet
Race Official
Veteran
 
silver bullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
United Kingdom
Posts: 1,857
silver bullet should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridsilver bullet should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridsilver bullet should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Can I throw another thought into this.
What are we talking about here, one regular competitor and another who has two 'spare cars' to use loan or hire out when drivers main cars are not ready.
Do you not think that if these cars were put into a historic class it might actually entice other people to bring their 6R4's RS200's etc out to play. Therefore we may see more of these wonderful cars out, rather than the one or two we get at the moment
silver bullet is offline  
__________________
Rallycross - The Best Motorsport In The World.
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 12:50 (Ref:1842105)   #64
Guffy
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
United Kingdom
Shap Cumbria
Posts: 291
Guffy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by leonidas
A. Encourage as many competitors to go to full Div. 1 spec. You could do this by allowing all supercars to run together but only allow full Div. 1 cars to score MSA championship points. That way the public spectacle is still there but the ERC organisers know that the BRC is fully committed to a 'European parity' future.
This just wouldn't work, How would a competitor chasing championship points feel if he was accidently taken out by someone who wasn't eligble for points, Plus who would want to bring out and run a super car with nothing to aim for..? ie points
Guffy is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 12:55 (Ref:1842109)   #65
chris cake
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
England
LYDDEN HILL
Posts: 370
chris cake should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by silver bullet
Can I throw another thought into this.
What are we talking about here, one regular competitor and another who has two 'spare cars' to use loan or hire out when drivers main cars are not ready.
Do you not think that if these cars were put into a historic class it might actually entice other people to bring their 6R4's RS200's etc out to play. Therefore we may see more of these wonderful cars out, rather than the one or two we get at the moment
Very good point David.

You just have to look at some of the cars which are being rolled out to race in the Revivals already!
With 6 - 8 group B cars in one race surely that would keep everyone happy.
chris cake is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 13:25 (Ref:1842136)   #66
PhergAthor
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Belgium
Maasmechelen, Belgium
Posts: 309
PhergAthor should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Bit of a surprising discussion here.

Is the question: should Gibson be banned? Because GT and DC will race cars within the ERC regs. Is all the fuss about 1 Metro, because you should expand the discussion to all non-ERC allowed Supercars. Eg the tubular chassis cars. So what if there are some cars not allowed in Europe, the main thing is that new machinery is encouraged.
You even should not start discussion on homologation in low-budget classes like stockhach.
As far as cars matter to get an ERC-round: there should be a field that can compete in the ERC, thats all.
A far bigger problem for GBR to get a round is the circuit. There are some strickt rules to be approved as an ERC venue. And I am not sure if any of the British circuits comply.

The old vs new topic here comes down to small entries at events, but then we must also restart the everlasting debate about drivers only willing to start in one of two RX-championships.
PhergAthor is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 13:50 (Ref:1842160)   #67
leonidas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
England
Coventry
Posts: 1,286
leonidas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridleonidas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guffy
This just wouldn't work, How would a competitor chasing championship points feel if he was accidently taken out by someone who wasn't eligble for points,
That's racing. That sort of thing happens all the time in multi-class circuit racing - and just about every year at Le Mans.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guffy
Plus who would want to bring out and run a super car with nothing to aim for..? ie points,
Well it wouldn't bother me providing it was part of a competitive well matched race. Its better than having no-one to race against. A 6R4 is unlikely to win the BRC championship again anyway as things have moved on. If you've got a Group B car you're not running it to impress a manufacturer or as a career move - you're doing for fun. You can still hope to win the odd meeting and take home the bragging rights...

Alternatively have an official MSA British Championship for Div. 1 only and BRDA Rallycross Masters Championship for all 4wd (div 1 and Group B)? (but run together)

Last edited by leonidas; 15 Feb 2007 at 13:57.
leonidas is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 14:44 (Ref:1842205)   #68
WJM
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Netherlands
Posts: 453
WJM should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by leonidas
I think there are really two issues here...

1. How do we get an ERC round back?

A. Encourage as many competitors to go to full Div. 1 spec. You could do this by allowing all supercars to run together but only allow full Div. 1 cars to score MSA championship points. That way the public spectacle is still there but the ERC organisers know that the BRC is fully committed to a 'European parity' future.
Division 1 is not the problem in Britain. There are plenty of Division 1 cars that can make up a decent 20+ car field if there was an European race. The problem are the other classes Division 1a and Division 2. They would not even reach 10 drivers if an ERC round was held. Therefore it's quite a huge error from both organisers that they haven't opened up a class for Division 2. Since the ERC restarts the class this year it would be a perfect opportunity to make a fresh step towards European regulations.
WJM is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 15:30 (Ref:1842240)   #69
leonidas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
England
Coventry
Posts: 1,286
leonidas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridleonidas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I take your point about 1A but the perception over here is that current Div 2 is dead so no-one is going to run one. To be fair several existing ERC rounds run with very few cars in classes 1A and 2 from the home country. Any ERC event at Lydden would get a reasonable entry from France and Bel/Ned anyway.

There may be some British support for the new RWD Cup class but I haven't seen any published regulations for this yet. Do you know if they've been published or are available online somewhere?
leonidas is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 15:52 (Ref:1842259)   #70
WJM
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Netherlands
Posts: 453
WJM should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by leonidas
Any ERC event at Lydden would get a reasonable entry from France and Bel/Ned anyway.
But I doubt Lydden Hill will ever host an ERC race again. It's very far from European standard.

Quote:
There may be some British support for the new RWD Cup class but I haven't seen any published regulations for this yet. Do you know if they've been published or are available online somewhere?
It's been on the FIA site for a few months now.
http://www.fia.com/resources/documen...04_Art_279.pdf
The new regulations are in article 6.
WJM is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 18:30 (Ref:1842407)   #71
Thundersports
Veteran
 
Thundersports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Balearic Islands
On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,661
Thundersports should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Rallycross tried to start modernising before in the 90s with banning the old cars which to quote "Arthur Debenham" was suicide for the championship which was proved correct. Rallycross is about variety and I for one would be less inclined to go if I thought there would be no Group B dinosaurs competing.
Another point is if Mr Cake and the BRDA want to have a strong series then they should start TALKING to each other. As it stands at the moment we have one good series and one half arsed attempt which is diluting the competitors, sponsers, TV etc.
The "super series" has old cars in Div 1 the 306 and Escorts and is supported by the also rans from the BRDA championship, it will only gain credability once the likes of Dermot, Doran, Evans etc compete on a regular basis rather than using it as a pre-season test.
Thundersports is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 18:38 (Ref:1842419)   #72
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Newer cars
Carnegie Focus now Fiesta
Doran Fiesta
Watson Xsara
Evans Astra
Bell Corolla
Mundy Focus
Gollop / Jordan Focus
McCann Subaru
McCluskey Xsara
Tracey 307
O'Donovan 306
Grant Escort
Jobb Escort RS2000

Any others?



Group B cars
Tracey RS200/ 6R4
Gibson 6R4
Rob Gibson 6R4 when hes out

Ian Rowlance 6R4

What other 6R4's / RS200's compete?

Ye Group B cars really are holding the newer cars back
Like I said let the older cars race in the BRC, ROC but not allow them to compete IF we get a ERC round

If you put the Group B cars in revivals / historic class how will it be before the RWD historics start moaning about them winning everything

Remember the Spaceframes that where going to be allowed to compete with the supercars/ div 1 cars they never took off did they?
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 18:45 (Ref:1842425)   #73
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Proper engine sound

http://www.johnpricerallying.co.uk/metro6r4.mp3
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 18:52 (Ref:1842437)   #74
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sorry Chris I missed the Corsa out on my list above
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2007, 19:43 (Ref:1842483)   #75
leonidas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
England
Coventry
Posts: 1,286
leonidas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridleonidas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thundersports
As it stands at the moment we have one good series and one half arsed attempt which is diluting the competitors, sponsers, TV etc.
I don't want the thread to take a 'mine's bigger than your's' line but... I'm very impressed by what Chris, Peter and the open championship are doing. They've got a range of high profile sponsors, a tv deal, a dvd review, they produce good promotional material and a website that is updated almost daily. They've organised the first successful winter meeting for ages. That doesn't strike me as 'half arsed'...
leonidas is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.