Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 Mar 2011, 14:03 (Ref:2852492)   #51
Spritle
Veteran
 
Spritle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location:
46 Egernon Road
Posts: 1,013
Spritle has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Bernard is professing his love for the new toy engines again:

http://en.espnf1.com/fia/motorsport/story/43949.html
Spritle is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2011, 15:47 (Ref:2852533)   #52
Pingguest
Veteran
 
Pingguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Netherlands
Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,192
Pingguest should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marbot View Post
The cars should be lighter (carrying 30 to 40% less fuel) which should make up for any bhp deficiencies.
For the race, yes. But the weight in qualifying is likely to be unchanged.
Pingguest is offline  
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2011, 16:13 (Ref:2852544)   #53
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spritle View Post
Bernard is professing his love for the new toy engines again:

http://en.espnf1.com/fia/motorsport/story/43949.html
Considering how well his own team did with 4 cylinder, 1500cc, turbocharged engines I can't see what his beef is.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2011, 20:15 (Ref:2852678)   #54
Marbot
Retired
20KPINAL
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
United Kingdom
Posts: 22,897
Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pingguest View Post
For the race, yes. But the weight in qualifying is likely to be unchanged.
For me, the main difference with the new engines will be vast increase in torque. Not only at the top end of the rev range, but also at the mid and lower rev ranges as well, especially compared to a normally aspirated V8 or even a V10! Peak power isn't everything.
Marbot is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2011, 21:30 (Ref:2852736)   #55
wnut
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spritle View Post
Bernard is professing his love for the new toy engines again:

http://en.espnf1.com/fia/motorsport/story/43949.html
"The competitors have got to race...."

Bernie is absolutely correct, I agree with every word.
He has built F1 as a commercial entity and the clown department should take notice!

The motor manufacturers did not make F1 what it is today and they are leading it up a blind alley!
wnut is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Mar 2011, 11:42 (Ref:2852969)   #56
neiltb
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Scotland
toronto
Posts: 275
neiltb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marbot View Post
Peak power isn't everything.
you don't work in marketing do you!
neiltb is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Mar 2011, 15:09 (Ref:2853094)   #57
Marbot
Retired
20KPINAL
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
United Kingdom
Posts: 22,897
Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by neiltb View Post
you don't work in marketing do you!
No. So it will probably always baffles me as to why truck manufacturers badge up their tractor units with maximum bhp figures when it's clearly the torque output that matters most.

We must buy that truck because it has 550bhp and that one only has 500bhp, not withstanding the fact that the 550bhp truck is as flat as a pancake below 1500rpm!

There's no doubt that bhp sells cars, but it's mainly torque that wins races.
Marbot is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Mar 2011, 23:38 (Ref:2853298)   #58
cmotd
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Australia
Posts: 201
cmotd should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marbot View Post
No. So it will probably always baffles me as to why truck manufacturers badge up their tractor units with maximum bhp figures when it's clearly the torque output that matters most.

We must buy that truck because it has 550bhp and that one only has 500bhp, not withstanding the fact that the 550bhp truck is as flat as a pancake below 1500rpm!

There's no doubt that bhp sells cars, but it's mainly torque that wins races.
everybody knows what a horse is, no one has a clue what a torque is, or a newton meter, or a pound foot
cmotd is offline  
__________________
Sir Stirling Moss OBE "When Lewis Hamilton wins a race he has to thank Vodafone whereas in my day I used to chase the crumpet."
Quote
Old 26 Mar 2011, 09:30 (Ref:2853417)   #59
1975DCS
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Netherlands
Posts: 755
1975DCS should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I don't noise will be a big issue, anyone ever heard Grp B? I think the biggest problem are the stupid FIA rules that dictate every engine should be about the same. And how quick the cars will be depends on FIA again, I have no doubt that this 1.6 liters could be a lot quicker, but the rules probably make them slower...

Also funny: moaning about Ferrari, while their most iconic cars are turbocharged: GTO & F40 anyone? And these only have bigger engines, less bhp and more weight than those new F1.

I think people think: "oh an 1.6 turbo that is like a 200 bhp you find on a road car these days". But an 1.6 turbo with 700 bhp should sound a lot different and make a lot more rpm...
1975DCS is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Mar 2011, 13:39 (Ref:2853510)   #60
johntt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
England
England
Posts: 1,244
johntt should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pingguest View Post
I was talking about the 2013 engines. Why do you refer to the pre-1989 engines? It has no regard to my post. Besides, any comparison between the 2013 and pre-1989 engines is improper. The new power units are targeted to have somewhere near 580 bhp, assisted with a 150 bhp KERS for 60 seconds per lap. In other words: for almost half a lap on Spa-Francorchamps Formula 1 cars will, to today's standards, seriously lack engine power.
Except 2013 will also bring in new aerodynamic rules, specifically a lot more underbody downforce and much smaller wings (or maybe no wings at all, though that is probably a bit far-fetched ).

Less wings mean less drag which means the cars will need less power to reach the same speeds.
johntt is offline  
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engines ANDYKNOWS Formula One 20 5 Jul 2007 15:15
How superior are turbocharged engines compaired to NA engines in sportscar racing? chernaudi Sportscar & GT Racing 16 27 Dec 2006 18:07
Engines coxmattycox Touring Car Racing 6 22 Aug 2004 08:41
Engines Edmonton ChampCar World Series 45 23 Apr 2003 15:46
Engines Abarnett Racing Technology 1 15 Feb 2002 23:37


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:04.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.