Quote:
Originally Posted by chillibowl
fair question.
i guess this is where my n.american/other sports i watch/political beliefs slant comes into it for me because this practice is such common place over here.
in the NBA, for example, the trading of players between teams requires an exchange of a similar amount of assets (so everyone knows everyone's salary). this protects small market teams from just losing out to the big teams who can afford to pay more. add in revenue sharing and salary/budget caps and you start to get a framework for a more balanced distribution of talent and resources. all this requires the teams to be transparent with us the fans from whom they generate this revenue in the first place.
does it always work...of course not but the overall trajectory, imo, has been a greater number of team capable of winning. so a more successful sports league. naturally i want the same thing for F1.
i've taken a few stabs at this now...not sure i can answer it any better.
|
I get exactly where you’re coming from and don’t necessarily disagree with you :-)
I suppose there’s a massive difference...being from Europe Ummm used to seeing massive disparities in wages....take football for instance. How is it fair that someone can earn £200k a week, play against someone who earns £200 a week......
...a lot of that comes down to talent, marketing and success.
Unfair? Probably....both players do the same job, kick the same ball, play on the same pitch, but one is more successful and therefore is far more marketable....it’s all about return on investment.