Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 May 2005, 10:43 (Ref:1291429)   #1
R59
Veteran
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Heard and McDonald Islands
Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,523
R59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridR59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Adjustable Anti-Rollbars ?

What's the basic theory in making an dash adjustable anti-rollbar (cable operated).

Does anyone offer kits? or is it a case of getting the stuff made specifically for the car?

My car had them originally, but for some reason they were taken off (probably rule changes).

Rob.
R59 is offline  
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!!
A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!!
Quote
Old 2 May 2005, 10:58 (Ref:1291434)   #2
Chris_SLH
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Reading/L'boro
Posts: 16
Chris_SLH should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Hi,

Most adjustable anti roll bar systems use the 'blade type' system. The blade offers different second moment of inertia (and therefore stiffness) as it rotated at an angle relative to its fixings. The blade needs to be moved by 90 degrees from maximum to minimum position. This can be operated by a cable system or perhaps an electronic system utilising stepper motors???

Try someone like Demon tweeks for a kit or it might be possible to adapt an adjustable brake balance system into this role? Not sure on this one but a thought.

Cheers
Chris_SLH is offline  
Quote
Old 3 May 2005, 05:04 (Ref:1291752)   #3
tzei
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Finland
Finland
Posts: 165
tzei should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
BMW M3 race cars had levers inside and blades (front and rear) were operated via rods and links. Sorry, can't get you a picture.
tzei is offline  
Quote
Old 3 May 2005, 13:00 (Ref:1292019)   #4
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yes, blade anti-roll bars are usually operated from the cockpit via a "push/pull" type cable.
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 3 May 2005, 20:06 (Ref:1292301)   #5
R59
Veteran
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Heard and McDonald Islands
Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,523
R59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridR59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
OK. Blade it is then. Now I need sources for the equipment. No, not Demon Tweeks.

Rob.
R59 is offline  
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!!
A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!!
Quote
Old 3 May 2005, 22:36 (Ref:1292454)   #6
Chris_SLH
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Reading/L'boro
Posts: 16
Chris_SLH should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Hi

Looking through books and there is a good set of pictures in Carroll Smiths book 'Engineer to Win'. Shows both cable and mechanical rod based systems.
Chris_SLH is offline  
Quote
Old 4 May 2005, 18:40 (Ref:1293081)   #7
j'bar
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5
j'bar should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Hello

I'm not sure an adjustment on the move is such a good idea, especially if it's the front bar : it might make the car very oversteery if the front bar is softened too much relative to the rear, especially on a FWD car.

It might be a good idea to have only the rear bar adjustable to start with, then find out the effects from here.
j'bar is offline  
Quote
Old 4 May 2005, 19:00 (Ref:1293094)   #8
Mike Holmes
Racer
 
Mike Holmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
United Kingdom
Peterborough
Posts: 147
Mike Holmes should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Make sure your class rules allow them as lots these days specifically ban them!

Mike
Mike Holmes is offline  
Quote
Old 5 May 2005, 04:50 (Ref:1293374)   #9
R59
Veteran
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Heard and McDonald Islands
Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,523
R59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridR59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Just checked the rules again - Suspension - Unrestricted. The only stipulation is that the original mounting points (if not used) must remain.

The car is rear wheel drive, and the idea of adjustment on the move isn't what I'm looking for. It's to save having to jack up the car, crawl underneath, attack it with spanners, etc....

I'll look out the Carroll Smith book and see what I can make of it. If I look through the bits and pieces that I have with the car, other than the adjusting handles, I'm sure I'll find some more of the parts.

Rob.
R59 is offline  
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!!
A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!!
Quote
Old 18 May 2005, 00:25 (Ref:1303368)   #10
hotgemini
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location:
Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 78
hotgemini should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by j'bar
I'm not sure an adjustment on the move is such a good idea.
It seems most higher level touring car builders around the world disagree with you, but who is to say who is right and who is wrong.
hotgemini is offline  
Quote
Old 18 May 2005, 18:11 (Ref:1303957)   #11
j'bar
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5
j'bar should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotgemini
It seems most higher level touring car builders around the world disagree with you, but who is to say who is right and who is wrong.
I was only speaking from a safety point of view, ie having the ability to change considerably the balance of your car could be dangerous. But I agree it can help you lap faster if your front tyres don't wear the same way as your rear do.
j'bar is offline  
Quote
Old 19 May 2005, 07:45 (Ref:1304329)   #12
dtype38
Race Official
Veteran
 
dtype38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
England
East London
Posts: 2,479
dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by j'bar
I was only speaking from a safety point of view, ie having the ability to change considerably the balance of your car could be dangerous.
Had the same issue myself with my brake bias adjustment when I took my car for its SVA test. The MOT people insisted that I take the knob off and dowel pin the adjuster to prevent movement before they'd pronounce my brakes as safe

As for anti-roll bars... I set my spring dampers up properly and threw the anti-roll bars away! Handles just fine, and weights less
dtype38 is offline  
Quote
Old 19 May 2005, 21:59 (Ref:1304949)   #13
R59
Veteran
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Heard and McDonald Islands
Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,523
R59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridR59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The beauty with adjustable bars is that if it rains, you can soften the car with the tug of the handle, as you throw on your wets, or alternatively, stiffen up a wet shod car when it dries out and on go the slicks.

Having them cockpit adjustable saves jacking the car up to loosen the nut, and turn the bar. It also saves the need to make the pitstop to carry out the above also.
And it's just plain lazy! Now that I like!

Rob.
R59 is offline  
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!!
A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!!
Quote
Old 1 Jun 2005, 19:05 (Ref:1317241)   #14
TomS
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 198
TomS should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Dad's Lola runs adjustable front and rear anti-rollbar. I would post pics but am pretty useless with computers so it would have to be an email.

They are great other than the blades can crack and they have to be replaced which is quite expensive
TomS is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Jun 2005, 20:15 (Ref:1317311)   #15
dtype38
Race Official
Veteran
 
dtype38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
England
East London
Posts: 2,479
dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!
Given that I don't actually run anti-roll bars, any thoughts on how I might adjust my springing for wet/dry conditions? I have coil over AVO's all round :-)
dtype38 is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jun 2005, 08:34 (Ref:1318745)   #16
StephenRae
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Wales
North West
Posts: 871
StephenRae should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtype38
Given that I don't actually run anti-roll bars, any thoughts on how I might adjust my springing for wet/dry conditions? I have coil over AVO's all round :-)
I'm not skilled at agricultural engineering but couldn't you fit softer springs, then beef them up for the dry with those rubber 'helpers' made for towing trailers.. I think there is a blow up version available......or am I not helping here?
StephenRae is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Jun 2005, 10:08 (Ref:1319825)   #17
dtype38
Race Official
Veteran
 
dtype38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
England
East London
Posts: 2,479
dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!
It's not quite as "agricultural" a question as it might appear. If I simply fit softer spings because it's raining, then a dry line appears, the car will roll all over the place, but more importantly the tyres would certainly rub the wheel arches. If I fit longer soft springs to give more arch clearance just in case, then the ride height will be wrong and throw all my geometry out. Adjustable anti-roll bars allow for this, but without them I would need some sort of in-car adjustable coil spring stiffness.
dtype38 is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jun 2005, 23:45 (Ref:1322821)   #18
marcush.
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2004
Equatorial Guinea
Bad Ems /Germany
Posts: 376
marcush. should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
a cool move would be a second spring encapsuled in something like a slidercage with adjustable travel.
I did somthing like that ,it works very well and you can change from soft to firm in amatter of minutes.the key is taking the second spring out of the equation drastically stiffens the spring (the secondary spring can be stiffer than the main!),making the system cockpit adjusable...well...lets see ...
marcush. is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jun 2005, 08:18 (Ref:1322957)   #19
StephenRae
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Wales
North West
Posts: 871
StephenRae should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
dtype... that's why I suggested some method of softening the car up without having to change springs...I would think roll bars would be a must though, if only to adjust the balance of the car.
StephenRae is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jun 2005, 16:18 (Ref:1323305)   #20
dtype38
Race Official
Veteran
 
dtype38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
England
East London
Posts: 2,479
dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!
My car is quite nicely balanced as it is thank you but I take your point that with no roll bars I don't actually have anything to adjust! My car is actually quite pitch sensitive when braking, so I'd increased my front spring stiffness to reduce dive. I re-balanced by adding stiffer rear springs and found that I had so little roll that I didn't actually need roll bars. It was only when I got to my first wet race that I realised it was far too stiff. Will think on this further........
dtype38 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 12:04 (Ref:1330279)   #21
EVO1X
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Ireland
IRELAND
Posts: 23
EVO1X should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
anti roll bars

Toyota celica GPA works rallys cars had ajustsble front anti roll ball from inside the cockpit they used a racket lever like a handbrake so you could have about 5 settings between hard and soft
EVO1X is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2005, 09:45 (Ref:1356072)   #22
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtype38
As for anti-roll bars... I set my spring dampers up properly and threw the anti-roll bars away! Handles just fine, and weights less
It is unlikely, though not impossible, that you have the optimum front/rear weight transfer balance without using an anti roll bar at one end of the car at least.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2005, 09:53 (Ref:1356078)   #23
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by j'bar
I'm not sure an adjustment on the move is such a good idea, especially if it's the front bar : it might make the car very oversteery if the front bar is softened too much relative to the rear, especially on a FWD car
Best way to reduce the risk is to limit the range of adjustment. A limit that restricts the weight transfer to, say, 10% of the weight transfered in roll would make a noticeable difference to the handling but without being dangerous.

Best place for the adjustment is at the front as it will in most cases be the stiffer bar, and in the wet it may be the only bar connected.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2005, 10:48 (Ref:1356115)   #24
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Further to my post

Further to my post #22, if you are always on the top step of the podium, don't add anti roll bars!
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jul 2005, 16:36 (Ref:1357275)   #25
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
racecar will be running a piece on tuning arbs in the near future
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anti roll bar FilW Racing Technology 3 27 Apr 2006 12:31
Adjustable "Blade Type" Anti-Roll Bars Design Questions rabieng Racing Technology 5 5 Mar 2006 13:06
Rollbars for LMP1 and LMP2 cars? Garrett Sportscar & GT Racing 3 8 Dec 2004 07:05
Adjustable Downforce?? johnnyBgood Racing Technology 6 11 Oct 2003 23:32


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.