Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 Feb 2004, 19:47 (Ref:863073)   #1
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Homestead

Why doesn't GrandAm use the full roadcourse anymore and now just use the banking?
Edmonton is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Feb 2004, 21:08 (Ref:863146)   #2
Chevyguy
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Texas
Posts: 495
Chevyguy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Err.. what? If you mean that they just run the oval, I think you are way off. As far as I've heard, they're still on the road course, which only utilizes the banked turns 3 and 4 (oval). Unless you can point to a source of differant information, they are using the road course.
Chevyguy is offline  
__________________
"You always have to be smarter than the person next you"-J.C. Pringle

"No matter where you go, there you are"-Pigkiller
Quote
Old 4 Feb 2004, 21:11 (Ref:863150)   #3
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I ment they use the banking in 3 and 4 instead of the original layout behind the banking.
Edmonton is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Feb 2004, 21:33 (Ref:863181)   #4
Chevyguy
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Texas
Posts: 495
Chevyguy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
OK, i haven't seen that version of the track. I can't really answer that question, but it would make sense to me to utilize the banking just because it's there. With the the increased angle that they added last year, should be alot faster goin into turn 1 (roadcourse).
Chevyguy is offline  
__________________
"You always have to be smarter than the person next you"-J.C. Pringle

"No matter where you go, there you are"-Pigkiller
Quote
Old 4 Feb 2004, 21:50 (Ref:863207)   #5
Scrutineer78
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Scrutineer78 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think it was to increase the chances of completing the 250 kilometer distance within the 2.75 hours.

Judging from the test times, I think they'll use the banking this year, as well.
Scrutineer78 is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Feb 2004, 22:32 (Ref:863285)   #6
BobN
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 204
BobN should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
They are aiming at a 57 mph average?

I would think that almost ANY configuration would allow a race car to complete 250 kilometers in 2.75 hours. Well maybe not a figure 8.
BobN is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Feb 2004, 23:58 (Ref:863411)   #7
Vman
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location:
Seattle
Posts: 40
Vman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Maybe it has something to do with the spec tires not being able to cope with the load on the banking? Homestead always has alot of blow outs on the banking...
Vman is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 01:05 (Ref:863483)   #8
Gunman
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 102
Gunman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think its because of the lack of vehicle tunnel access to the infield, in the old configuration (ie when nascar 3 and 4 weren't used).
Gunman is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 01:21 (Ref:863493)   #9
Scrutineer78
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Scrutineer78 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by BobN
They are aiming at a 57 mph average?

I would think that almost ANY configuration would allow a race car to complete 250 kilometers in 2.75 hours. Well maybe not a figure 8.
Make that 250 miles
Scrutineer78 is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 02:00 (Ref:863523)   #10
BobN
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 204
BobN should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
They avaraged 100+MPH last year. 252 miles in 2:30:56.109

I still don't see where it would actually be a consideration to run 250 in 2.75 hour. That would only take 90.9 mph.

There is a bit of confusion between posts here showing the track sans banked sections and one on speedtv forum that show with banked section as being used this year. Either way, unless they have the same yellow and red situation they should be able to easily cover the 250 on either configuration in less than 2.75 hours. Are you thinking ALMS (2.75 hour, no mileage limit)?
BobN is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 02:16 (Ref:863532)   #11
skycafe
Race Official
Veteran
 
skycafe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
United States
Water on three sides
Posts: 4,126
skycafe is going for a new lap record!skycafe is going for a new lap record!skycafe is going for a new lap record!skycafe is going for a new lap record!skycafe is going for a new lap record!skycafe is going for a new lap record!
The race is 250 miles, the track layout will include one of the horseshoe shaped sections of the oval track. Go to grandam.com, pull up event schedule, pull up track info, and there will be a acrobat file of the track layout.
skycafe is offline  
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live.
Douglas Adams
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 03:36 (Ref:863576)   #12
Scrutineer78
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Scrutineer78 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Lap times are around 1:16 at the test. At an average of 1:18 a lap, going all green, that's 2 hours and 26 minutes. I have no idea what the pace speed is for GA but I'd assume it would take at least 3 minutes per lap under caution and I assume there would be at least 1 or 2.

I still think it was an assurance factor to complete the entire distance.
Scrutineer78 is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 03:59 (Ref:863586)   #13
billnchristy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
United States
Lawrenceville GA
Posts: 1,010
billnchristy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think its funny that they are running with IRL. I remember someone asking about (i think it was) T/A running with nascar but doing the infield courses and letting nascar do the oval, but it was brought up how hard it would be to convert back and forth.

The schedule has this "conversion" taking place in 15 minutes, so I guess that is out the window.
billnchristy is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 04:10 (Ref:863595)   #14
Scrutineer78
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
Scrutineer78 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What exactly is involved in the "conversion"? I assume laying the cones for turn one into the infield but what else?
Scrutineer78 is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 04:25 (Ref:863603)   #15
Chevyguy
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Texas
Posts: 495
Chevyguy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The infields at NASCAR races are usually packed to the gils with campers, media, transports, etc. I think the main issue is as simple as not having enough space to keep the infield courses clear and safe. The NASholes would probably cause some problems as they have no resect for any legitimate road racing series, much like many of you guys feel about NASCAR. I could see many of them throwing things like nails on the infield courses because they have to walk a longer route to the beer tent. A little extreme, but I might not be off by much.
Chevyguy is offline  
__________________
"You always have to be smarter than the person next you"-J.C. Pringle

"No matter where you go, there you are"-Pigkiller
Quote
Old 5 Feb 2004, 05:08 (Ref:863619)   #16
gttouring
Veteran
 
gttouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
USB 3.0
Posts: 4,536
gttouring should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
the grand am could really take off if it was a stadium series, ifeel, especially with their not too conventional rule sets. and what a great schedule they could have, and they could really set up well for fans- for the shorter races...
why doesn't SMI have any sun shades over the grandstands at their tracks by the way?
gttouring is offline  
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story.
Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET
I am shameless ...
Quote
Old 6 Feb 2004, 18:21 (Ref:865674)   #17
billnchristy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
United States
Lawrenceville GA
Posts: 1,010
billnchristy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I hate to say this, but to have a "NASCAR" like schedule for road racing, you would have to visit a LOT of ovals or repeat tracks a bunch, for instance:

Quality US/Canada Roadcourses capable of ALMS/GA racing:

Lime Rock Park
Watkins Glen
Mt. Tremblant
Mosport
Road America
Mid Ohio
Road Atlanta
VIR
Sebring
Portland
Laguna Seca
Sears Point
Barber Motorsports Park
Mexico City
Monterry (mex.)

So thats 15, not too shabby, I guess if we could get a series to actually hit everyone, that wouldnt be a bad schedule...its not 36 but that may be just a little ridiculous anyways!!
billnchristy is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homestead Results rdjones Sportscar & GT Racing 30 8 Mar 2004 22:49
Homestead this Weekend Tim Northcutt IRL Indycar Series 19 27 Feb 2004 00:20
looking forward to Homestead billnchristy Sportscar & GT Racing 3 7 Feb 2004 02:11
Homestead muggle not NASCAR & Stock Car Racing 11 23 Nov 2003 03:51
Champcar at Homestead The Snout ChampCar World Series 18 5 Mar 2003 21:33


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.