|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2 Aug 2010, 14:51 (Ref:2738223) | #51 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 394
|
Given that the 107% rule will have some exeptions, (like the one that says that cars outside 107% in Q1 will be permited to race if they have previously recorded faster times in FP 1, 2 and 3) it would be nice to know if the HRTs had faster laps in FP in the races when they were out in Q1
|
||
__________________
Racing is in my blood. |
2 Aug 2010, 15:11 (Ref:2738233) | #52 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,527
|
Answer to that question:
Bahrain - no change Malaysia - change of weather, but all cars were inside 107% of Practice 3 best time. Spain - SEN was inside 107% for Practice 2 Canada - CHA was inside 107% for Practice 2 Hungary - no change Which basically makes my mind up for me - the new teams are, for the most part, not a danger but anything slower than them should be looked at. 107% would largely address this |
||
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git' |
2 Aug 2010, 15:14 (Ref:2738236) | #53 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 394
|
wow, thanks for the speedy reply
So I guess that if HRT manage to continue, they can design a better stuff that that GP2 car, right? The same if Virgin finally admits a few hours of Wind Tunnel wont do wrong |
||
__________________
Racing is in my blood. |
29 Aug 2010, 15:09 (Ref:2751788) | #54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,387
|
Updated for Spa.
Again another wet/dry qualifying session, is there much to read into this? As an aside, all cars posted a time faster than 1:54.826 in Practice. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
29 Aug 2010, 15:30 (Ref:2751796) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
(I'm glad he was allowed to start, BTW, just interested in the rules that apply under such circumstances) |
||
|
14 Sep 2010, 06:54 (Ref:2759106) | #56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,387
|
Quote:
Anyway, an update for Monza.
Can I also add, that being a low downforce track, and the problem with the new cars being they don't generate downforce to start with, I didn't expect anything unusual. Singapore and Suzuka could be different. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
107% rule | roys1 | Formula One | 5 | 20 Mar 2005 12:59 |
107% | Marbot | Formula One | 18 | 11 Feb 2005 05:04 |
FIA clarifies Qualifying rules, 107% rule officially scrapped | Sodemo | Formula One | 18 | 22 Mar 2003 16:11 |
107% Rule | Yoong Montoya | Formula One | 33 | 20 Apr 2002 04:50 |
Why the 107% Rule? | touringlegend | Formula One | 17 | 15 Sep 2001 21:54 |