Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 Feb 2005, 18:53 (Ref:1220679)   #1
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ferrari 512

What do you think is the nicest of all the Ferrari 512's? My pick would be the codalunga.
Edmonton is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Feb 2005, 09:30 (Ref:1220789)   #2
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Penske's car.
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Old 9 Feb 2005, 12:46 (Ref:1220933)   #3
krt917
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Fleet
Posts: 1,814
krt917 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridkrt917 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
It's between the 512S Long Tail, the headlight of which can be seen above (I think) or the 512M that Penske ran in Sunoco colours. The NART 512Ms at Le Mans in 1971 had quite a nice livery, but if I had to pick one to own it would be the Penske car. It so nearly caught the JWA 917s out on more than one occasion.
krt917 is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Feb 2005, 18:31 (Ref:1221189)   #4
Rich R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
United Kingdom
dudley uk
Posts: 567
Rich R should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i liked the 512f that scuderia fillipenetti raced, fitted with a 917 windscreen.
Rich R is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Feb 2005, 20:21 (Ref:1222365)   #5
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What were the main reasons the 512's were never was as fast as the 917?
Edmonton is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Feb 2005, 20:28 (Ref:1222376)   #6
Rich R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
United Kingdom
dudley uk
Posts: 567
Rich R should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i think it was something to do with ferrari concentrating more on f1, and subsequently the sportscars didn't get the r&d time that porsche put into the 917. plus the porsche was a damn fine car.
Rich R is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Feb 2005, 22:41 (Ref:1222499)   #7
dwall
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4
dwall should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
the cars in 1970 definitely had the speed to compete with the 917 as they qualified 1st at Daytona,Sebring, Brands Hatch, and Monza, and the factory definitely worked hard to improve the cars.Witness the changes to the car between Daytona and the arrival of the M,but none of this could overcome the fact the car was intoduced late, and poor weather over the 69/70 winter meant little or no testing was done.
Some of the factory driver combinations where weak, and the strategy employed sometimes was poor, and pure bad luck also played its part.
dwall is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Feb 2005, 00:23 (Ref:1222567)   #8
emjaya
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Aland Islands
in a house
Posts: 341
emjaya should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
"I had to design the shape of the 512S in a hurry,which caused bad aerodynamics" said Mauro Forghieri

Mark Donohue said "Total horsepower equalled aerodynamic drag at 212mph,so that was our terminal speed"
emjaya is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Feb 2005, 13:23 (Ref:1222943)   #9
krt917
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Fleet
Posts: 1,814
krt917 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridkrt917 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edmonton
What were the main reasons the 512's were never was as fast as the 917?
Essentially, the 512S was slightly heavier and slightly less aerodynamically efficient than the 1970 917K. The team was also unlucky, but they also weren't as efficient in the pits as the JWA team. It all added up to a gap in race performance that only allowed the 'S' to win once.

The 512M was different, even though it won no championship races. If the works had run the car in 1971, they would have put a lot more pressure on the 917 (or Porsche would have pushed development faster), but the rule changes for 1972 meant that they left it to the private teams, who weren't on JWA's level. Apart, that is, from the Penske team. They were very quick, but didn't enter many races - and they suffered from sheer bad luck too.
krt917 is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another Kimi-Ferrari rumour: TGF's seat is Kimi, or Ferrari pays $5million (merged) Dixie Flatline Formula One 88 3 May 2006 21:17
Would you prefer to view Ferrari domination or a Battling Ferrari? Valve Bounce Formula One 36 25 Nov 2002 21:55
Ferrari boss theatens Ferrari may quit Inigo Montoya Formula One 58 16 Oct 2002 07:58
Year old Ferrari for Ferrari in first GP FullMonty Formula One 49 3 Mar 2002 05:28
Ferrari vs McLaren vs Ferrari? pink69 Formula One 2 3 Jun 2001 19:57


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.