 |
|
7 Jan 2011, 11:13 (Ref:2812403)
|
#16
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,676
|
Jeremy your talent is wasted on this humble board...
|
|
__________________
Borrowed money is only credit in a bull market - its debt in a bear market
|
7 Jan 2011, 12:44 (Ref:2812453)
|
#17
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Attleborough- 5 minutes from Snet! |
Posts: 12,062
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon drabble
Jeremy your talent is wasted on this humble board...
|
No it isn't.
Thank you Jeremy for the insight. Confirmation that the two 'Monza' caps I have fitted and which have the secondary cap underneath should be acceptable!
|
|
|
7 Jan 2011, 14:37 (Ref:2812516)
|
#18
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,612
|
So,those of us who have a tried and tested Exposed Monza cap [Spa 2009- didn't leak a drop of the 100ltr's of Belgiums 'Finest'] Now have to work out something that wont leak,doesn't negate the idea of having a quick fill filler. Why oh why cant these prats leave well alone??? Next thing we'll hear is that there are anti leak inserts available----------- from a factory owned by a director of the FIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111
|
|
__________________
Living the dream,Chief instruktor and racing on the worlds best circuits-The Nordschleife and Spa.Getting to drive the worlds best cars-someone has to do it, so glad its me.
|
7 Jan 2011, 15:07 (Ref:2812536)
|
#19
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,523
|
funny you should say that.............
|
|
|
7 Jan 2011, 16:45 (Ref:2812574)
|
#20
|
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 32,155
|
I doubt that it's much of a problem Terry, but none-the-less it's still a pain in the butt.
that said I think there's room to plug an n/r valve on to here before fitting the Monza Cap.
|
|
__________________
Is there a word for Schadenfreude?
|
7 Jan 2011, 16:55 (Ref:2812577)
|
#21
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,612
|
Easyier if you dont have a 3 inch filler neck though. 
Why do you want to fit a Monza Cap on a small neck-all you need do is fit a screw type cap. Dont forget to get a Rollover valve fitted to your breather,thats a certain 'Fail' at Spa.
|
|
__________________
Living the dream,Chief instruktor and racing on the worlds best circuits-The Nordschleife and Spa.Getting to drive the worlds best cars-someone has to do it, so glad its me.
|
7 Jan 2011, 17:01 (Ref:2812581)
|
#22
|
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 32,155
|
Already got one. Standard on all my cars.
|
|
__________________
Is there a word for Schadenfreude?
|
7 Jan 2011, 20:11 (Ref:2812695)
|
#23
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,977
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Mallett
Already got one. Standard on all my cars. 
|
I have a 'do not invert' sticker in my car
|
|
__________________
Joe Allenby-Byrne
trading as Zefarelly since 1985
|
9 Jan 2011, 22:56 (Ref:2813460)
|
#24
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,466
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Bell
But a lot of 'period' seats don't have aperture in base for them and with glassfibre car need to have somewhere on floor to locate them, so looks like a way of getting owners to spend lots of money..... 
|
brazing a plate or bar between 2 chassistubes in a glassfibre car wont coast that much........unless you have a Lotus.
|
|
__________________
did anyone find my 3/4-7/8 GEDORE ringspanner at SPA?
|
10 Jan 2011, 05:45 (Ref:2813536)
|
#25
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Attleborough- 5 minutes from Snet! |
Posts: 12,062
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by esper
brazing a plate or bar between 2 chassistubes in a glassfibre car wont coast that much........unless you have a Lotus.
|
Luckily Esper I don't have a Lotus and luckily have found on looking underneath that there is already a cross tube near enough to be used for mounts! Just need to work out if seat can be modded or if will have to be replaced.
|
|
|
11 Jan 2011, 09:17 (Ref:2814087)
|
#26
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FISCracer
8.3.2.1.3 Roof reinforcement :
Compulsory for cars CT and GTS over 2000 cc
The upper part of the safety cage must comply with one of Drawings K-19, K-20 or K21.
The reinforcements may follow the curve of the roof.
For competitions without co-drivers, in the case of Drawing K-19 only, only one diagonal member may be fitted but its front connection must be on the driver’s side.
The ends of the reinforcements must be less than 100 mm from the junction between rollbars and members (not applicable to the top of the V formed by reinforcements in Drawings K-20 and K-21).
|
Hi everyone.
First of all, thanks for posting the link with new regs.
I have a question about the new rollbar rules. My car (Ford Mustang 1965) is fitted with a rollbar which has 1 diagonal member (drawing K-12), 1 doorbar on each side (drawing K-15) and no roof reinforcement (just main roof members). I had never have problems so far during scrutineering (both in Italy and Europe), so I am wondering if the new modifications (red text) of article 8.3.2 onwards (diagonal member for Ct and GT over 2.000cc- roof reinforcement- doorbars) apply to all periods of cars or from period F or....
Thank you fro your reply.
Kind regards.
Enrico
|
|
|
11 Jan 2011, 12:47 (Ref:2814174)
|
#27
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Attleborough- 5 minutes from Snet! |
Posts: 12,062
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enrico Spaggiari
Hi everyone. I am wondering if the new modifications (red text) of article 8.3.2 onwards (diagonal member for Ct and GT over 2.000cc- roof reinforcement- doorbars) apply to all periods of cars or from period F or....
Kind regards.
Enrico
|
Enrico, my take on this- as someone with no authority at all on the subject, but have tried to interpret the regs  - is that it is over 2 litre CT and GTS cars of all periods.
Which means from Jan 1947 (Start of 'E') through to whenever CT & GTS finish- could be mid 80s or later- get confused trying to work that bit out!
Maybe I am wrong regarding period 'E' cars but looks like that from Jan 1962 'F' onwards like your Mustang are included. But this is only my interpretation- hopefully some clarification will come from race organisers and scrutineers before our seasons start!
Makes me glad only have under 2 litre car- but perhaps FIA saving that for next year!
|
|
|
11 Jan 2011, 16:27 (Ref:2814283)
|
#28
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 55
|
Thanks Mike.
Unfortunately,when new rules come out it's always a matter of interpretation... Anyway I have had the same feeling as you... over 2.000cc cars for all periods :-(
More kilos in the car, more euros out of the pocket... That's motor racing, isn't it?
|
|
|
11 Jan 2011, 18:27 (Ref:2814337)
|
#29
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Attleborough- 5 minutes from Snet! |
Posts: 12,062
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enrico Spaggiari
More kilos in the car, more euros out of the pocket... That's motor racing, isn't it?
|
Certainly is. Thinking myself lucky that have only got job to do from App K changes!
Suddenly non FIA historic racing becomes more appealing!
|
|
|
13 Jan 2011, 17:32 (Ref:2815317)
|
#30
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,977
|
which 99% of it is anyway!
|
|
__________________
Joe Allenby-Byrne
trading as Zefarelly since 1985
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
01.01.02 - An Important Day
|
Aysedasi |
Sportscar & GT Racing |
11 |
5 Jan 2002 22:42 |
Callaway 01
|
pink69 |
Sportscar & GT Racing |
6 |
13 Apr 2001 00:27 |
|
|
|