Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 Sep 2019, 10:55 (Ref:3928299)   #76
DX20VT
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 325
DX20VT should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I had it recorded and it took me going back and forth a few times to figure it out.

From what I could tell,

On lap 12 Jamie was the leader.
He pitted just before the safety car and put in about 40L of fuel.
Came out down the back somewhere, leader of those who had already pitted.
Safety car came out and all those in front of Jamie pitted, S Mac put in around 90L of fuel,
Jamie and the previously pitted cars passed them while they were in the pits as they stopped for a lot longer putting in 90L of fuel.
That put jamie back into first and Lee 2nd, but both requiring a longer second stop.

When he came up behind the safety car, he was the leader of the race.
Lee was second.
Whincups mistake was passing the safety car,
Race controls was letting everyone else through after that.?
DX20VT is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 11:04 (Ref:3928302)   #77
GTRMagic
Race Official
1% Club
 
GTRMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Australia
Sell me this pen....
Posts: 46,645
GTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Whincup To Face CAMS Sanctions..?

GTRMagic is offline  
__________________
Happy David Thexton Day, 21st March 2003
“I am not uncertain” - Dollar Bill Stern, Billions
“Fear stimulates my imagination” - Don Draper, Mad Men
“Everybody Lies” - Dr Gregory House
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 12:06 (Ref:3928311)   #78
mayhem
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Aruba
On that Island in LOST.
Posts: 3,219
mayhem should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridmayhem should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Whincup says ' Sorry about that' to CAMS
mayhem is offline  
__________________
The Jerk Store rang...
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 12:09 (Ref:3928313)   #79
GTRMagic
Race Official
1% Club
 
GTRMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Australia
Sell me this pen....
Posts: 46,645
GTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayhem View Post
It IS Bathurst in a couple of weeks....

Unconvinced that Mr Whincup was entirely wrong, although his past history with Safety Cars probably clouds many views.

What exactly is CAMS’ succession plan for Mr Schenken anyway?
GTRMagic is offline  
__________________
Happy David Thexton Day, 21st March 2003
“I am not uncertain” - Dollar Bill Stern, Billions
“Fear stimulates my imagination” - Don Draper, Mad Men
“Everybody Lies” - Dr Gregory House
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 12:22 (Ref:3928317)   #80
mayhem
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Aruba
On that Island in LOST.
Posts: 3,219
mayhem should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridmayhem should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Whincup shouldnt have passed, Roland even admitted that. But technically Whincup shouldnt have been stopped by the SC. His race was screwed from that point if he stayed behind the SC and he knew that.

But then the officials had zero conviction that they'd done the right thing and called all the cars through to pick up Whincup because Triple 8 complained. Which just exacerbated their stuff ups. Incredible really, surely heads roll for the complete sham? Most other sports would stand people down for such a stuff up.
mayhem is offline  
__________________
The Jerk Store rang...
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 12:52 (Ref:3928322)   #81
banksie
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 436
banksie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by DX20VT View Post
I had it recorded and it took me going back and forth a few times to figure it out.

From what I could tell,

On lap 12 Jamie was the leader.
He pitted just before the safety car and put in about 40L of fuel.
Came out down the back somewhere, leader of those who had already pitted.
Safety car came out and all those in front of Jamie pitted, S Mac put in around 90L of fuel,
Jamie and the previously pitted cars passed them while they were in the pits as they stopped for a lot longer putting in 90L of fuel.
That put jamie back into first and Lee 2nd, but both requiring a longer second stop.

When he came up behind the safety car, he was the leader of the race.
Lee was second.
Whincups mistake was passing the safety car,
Race controls was letting everyone else through after that.?
Wrong. When Whincup was behind/passing the safety car, he was still behind those in the pits, eg. McLaughlin and van Gisbergen.

By passing the safety car, Whincup was able to get passed McLaughlin and van Gisbergen etc, but Holdsworth and others were trapped.

In the third of the lap the safety car had done, had any other cars been waved passed by the safety car? Did race control not look at the timing and see car 17 in first place? All the drivers could see race controls mistake, shame race control couldn't.
banksie is offline  
__________________
banksie!!!
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 12:56 (Ref:3928323)   #82
Tourer
Veteran
 
Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Sideways
Posts: 4,367
Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DX20VT View Post
I had it recorded and it took me going back and forth a few times to figure it out.

From what I could tell,

On lap 12 Jamie was the leader.
He pitted just before the safety car and put in about 40L of fuel.
Came out down the back somewhere, leader of those who had already pitted.
Safety car came out and all those in front of Jamie pitted, S Mac put in around 90L of fuel,
Jamie and the previously pitted cars passed them while they were in the pits as they stopped for a lot longer putting in 90L of fuel.
That put jamie back into first and Lee 2nd, but both requiring a longer second stop.

When he came up behind the safety car, he was the leader of the race.
Lee was second.
Whincups mistake was passing the safety car,
Race controls was letting everyone else through after that.?
Give that man a cigar! Yep mate, that is exactly what happened.

For those struggling with this, let's spell out how it works:
  • Safety Car boards & flags are called and SC conditions come into play - this does NOT mean that the SC has gone out on track though
  • In a relatively low-risk situation such as a car stopped on track, the normal practice is for the SC to be held at pit exit waiting for a gap in front of the leader - race control runs this via radio
  • As the leader approaches (I'd suggest at Puke that it would most likely be as the leader exits the hairpin) the SC is scrambled out onto the circuit to be ready to pick up the leader
  • If the leader pits (as happened at Puke - along with a bunch of other cars) those that do not pit (who are still at close to race pace) go past the pit lane on track and arrive at the SC before the previous race leader
  • Bear in mind as well that in this case, 88 (on track) went past 17 (stopped in pit lane) and crossed the stripe, taking back the lead of the race
  • 88 was now leading the race and was correctly grabbed by the SC on the back straight (another indication by the way that the SC had been called for 17 & had to wait some time due to the pit stops is that it had got as far as the back chute)
  • Whincup, possibly realising that the others who DID pit under the SC had gained a big advantage over him (more fuel in the pit stop, meaning shorter stops under "live" conditions later) or not realising that 17 had pitted, went past the SC in error - either way, poor communication to him from the team in hindsight
  • Race Control then made a really big error by waving all those in front of 17 past the SC - categorically screwed all their races.
  • Those in front of 17 would have suffered without the race control mistake though as they had stopped under "live" conditions and 17 plus the others that pitted under SC had used the opportunity to take on bigger fuel loads and therefore have shorter stops later in the race
  • Hope that all makes sense
Tourer is offline  
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 13:03 (Ref:3928325)   #83
Tourer
Veteran
 
Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Sideways
Posts: 4,367
Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by banksie View Post
Wrong. When Whincup was behind/passing the safety car, he was still behind those in the pits, eg. McLaughlin and van Gisbergen.

By passing the safety car, Whincup was able to get passed McLaughlin and van Gisbergen etc, but Holdsworth and others were trapped.

In the third of the lap the safety car had done, had any other cars been waved passed by the safety car? Did race control not look at the timing and see car 17 in first place? All the drivers could see race controls mistake, shame race control couldn't.
Sorry mate, you've got it wrong - DX20VT is right on the money. Whincup was in front of those in the pits as he had driven past them on the race track whilst they were stopped in the pits.

No other cars would have been waved through in that initial ⅓ of a lap done by the SC as all of them in front of 88 had pitted, allowing 88 to pass them and take back the lead of the race.

17 was in 1st place when the SC was called but lost 1st place when it pitted and 88 drove past the pit lane out on the race track.
Tourer is offline  
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 13:54 (Ref:3928330)   #84
johnh875
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 2,540
johnh875 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No, the positions on the side of the screen showed Whincup in 13th or so when the SC was called, then after he passed it and crossed the control line while the other cars were still in the pits taking on a heap of fuel he suddenly popped up into 1st, while Holdsworth was still back in 14th behind the SC. McLaughlin etc got out of the pit ahead of the SC and joined the train in P2 onwards.

Race control letting Holdsworth etc past to go around would have put things back to how they were before the SC (ignoring Whincup), which is great except the first 12 cars have had a free pitstop with a big fuel load.

Seeing as Reynolds car could have been left on track for the rest of the race if we were in the old days, race control's handling of the situation has had a big impact on the race result. If they had held the SC for another lap JW, LH and co would have gotten back to the lead, unless the pitting teams realised this and cut back on the fuel. On the other hand I'm not really comfortable with cars running at full speed under full course yellows.

The whole system needs an overhaul from the ground up, including a clear distinction between retrieving a broken car and emergency response.
johnh875 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2019, 23:02 (Ref:3928425)   #85
Lukin
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Australia
Perth
Posts: 137
Lukin should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tourer View Post
Sorry mate, you've got it wrong - DX20VT is right on the money. Whincup was in front of those in the pits as he had driven past them on the race track whilst they were stopped in the pits.

No other cars would have been waved through in that initial ⅓ of a lap done by the SC as all of them in front of 88 had pitted, allowing 88 to pass them and take back the lead of the race.

17 was in 1st place when the SC was called but lost 1st place when it pitted and 88 drove past the pit lane out on the race track.
Incorrect

http://racing.natsoft.com.au/6438280...7.70Y/Chart?36

Look at car 5, was 14th before everyone stopped, 11th once everyone had stopped on Lap 14. Whincup was only in the lead on L14 because he passed the safety car and was able to get back to the start finish line and beat SM and SVG out of the pits. LH was doing 80 km/h behind the SC and never had a chance to get back and beat those guys out of the pits.

What you said SHOULD have happened. JW and LH should have been in the lead without the poor deployment of the SC.

Before the SC JW/ LH were about 55s behind of SM/SVG. The SC deployed into the gap between Those two groups. It slowed down LH/JW and allowed SVG/SM to get in and out of the pits without losing position.

If LH had been the leader than getting waved around would put him almost a lap ahead. But it didn’t, his position didn’t change when we was waved around did it?
When LH was first car behind the SC he was in 11th and almost a lap down on JW/SVG/SM. He was waved through to get the pack in order.

JW muddied the waters slightly by passing the SC. Without this he would have restarted 10th, 1 spot in front of LH.
JW passing the SC did not effect the way the SC deployed or the fact that SM/SVG got huge gains under the SC.
Lukin is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 00:30 (Ref:3928430)   #86
leothedrummer
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 198
leothedrummer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukin View Post
However the decision to deploy at that exact time (picking up the cars in 10th) and then hold up the first car that arrived was terrible. And if they didn’t know who the leader was, or what was going to happen, at that point they are useless.
Given the incident, they screwed half the field for nothing really. There was no danger given the position of car 9. They should have let it run for another lap under With the SC on standby, the pack would have sorted themselves out.
I can't agree with this - number one priority when talking about a safety car should be exactly that....safety. Not competition or entertainment. If a safety car is needed, it should be deployed immediately. If safety car deployment can wait a lap or two so as to not mess up the race, then the safety car wasn't needed in the first place.

And if it isn't "fair" to deploy immediately, then it isn't "fair" to deploy later....there's always going to be someone getting shafted, but that's something that should come down to bad luck, not a conscious decision to help one party but not another.
leothedrummer is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 02:31 (Ref:3928439)   #87
Compromised
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 852
Compromised should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
"Safety car" is just a misnomer - until something changes regarding drivers speeding around the track under SC conditions, it's laughable to suggest it's deployment is for "safety".
Compromised is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 02:57 (Ref:3928441)   #88
sizzle
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Darwin
Posts: 3,527
sizzle should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridsizzle should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compromised View Post
"Safety car" is just a misnomer - until something changes regarding drivers speeding around the track under SC conditions, it's laughable to suggest it's deployment is for "safety".
Entertainment vehicle.

And you are absolutely correct, drivers setting nigh on green sectors in their haste to either get to the pits or then catch the entertainment vehicle prove it isn't about safety.
sizzle is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 03:11 (Ref:3928442)   #89
leothedrummer
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 198
leothedrummer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Compromised View Post
"Safety car" is just a misnomer - until something changes regarding drivers speeding around the track under SC conditions, it's laughable to suggest it's deployment is for "safety".
Exactly. That argument reinforces the same point as mine.
leothedrummer is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 03:31 (Ref:3928445)   #90
bludvl_x19
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Australia
umop apisdn
Posts: 1,638
bludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridbludvl_x19 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tourer View Post
[*]Bear in mind as well that in this case, 88 (on track) went past 17 (stopped in pit lane) and crossed the stripe, taking back the lead of the race[*]88 was now leading the race and was correctly grabbed by the SC on the back straight (another indication by the way that the SC had been called for 17 & had to wait some time due to the pit stops is that it had got as far as the back chute)
It is really hard to tell from the live footage, but I actually think those two things happened in the opposite order. Otherwise Holtsworth should have been on JW's hammer.

We can't tell from the broadcast when the physical SC car hit the track, and exactly when JW passes the SC can't be put into a race context because of that.
bludvl_x19 is online now  
__________________
Supercars isn't the sport. The sport is motor racing.
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 04:41 (Ref:3928451)   #91
Sandgroper
Veteran
 
Sandgroper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Australia
Perth WA (south of the river)
Posts: 2,534
Sandgroper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayhem View Post
Whincup shouldnt have passed, .
Supposedly he was advised to by his engineer.

I said the same thing...
Sandgroper is online now  
__________________
GO Hard or GO Home
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 09:13 (Ref:3928481)   #92
mayhem
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Aruba
On that Island in LOST.
Posts: 3,219
mayhem should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridmayhem should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
RD said it was the driver's choice.
mayhem is offline  
__________________
The Jerk Store rang...
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 11:11 (Ref:3928505)   #93
Kixx
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 48
Kixx should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukin View Post
Incorrect

http://racing.natsoft.com.au/6438280...7.70Y/Chart?36

Look at car 5, was 14th before everyone stopped, 11th once everyone had stopped on Lap 14. Whincup was only in the lead on L14 because he passed the safety car and was able to get back to the start finish line and beat SM and SVG out of the pits. LH was doing 80 km/h behind the SC and never had a chance to get back and beat those guys out of the pits.

What you said SHOULD have happened. JW and LH should have been in the lead without the poor deployment of the SC.

Before the SC JW/ LH were about 55s behind of SM/SVG. The SC deployed into the gap between Those two groups. It slowed down LH/JW and allowed SVG/SM to get in and out of the pits without losing position.

If LH had been the leader than getting waved around would put him almost a lap ahead. But it didn’t, his position didn’t change when we was waved around did it?
When LH was first car behind the SC he was in 11th and almost a lap down on JW/SVG/SM. He was waved through to get the pack in order.

JW muddied the waters slightly by passing the SC. Without this he would have restarted 10th, 1 spot in front of LH.
JW passing the SC did not effect the way the SC deployed or the fact that SM/SVG got huge gains under the SC.
Spot on!

They did a terrible job of explaining this in the telecast, even after the race when they had the time
Kixx is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 13:52 (Ref:3928525)   #94
Sandgroper
Veteran
 
Sandgroper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Australia
Perth WA (south of the river)
Posts: 2,534
Sandgroper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayhem View Post
RD said it was the driver's choice.
"While I knew I wasn’t the leader of the race, and despite my engineer confidently telling me over the radio to not get held up by the safety car, the lights in front of me were orange"

Yes JW is in control of his own destiny but you do have to also trust the people around you also.
Sandgroper is online now  
__________________
GO Hard or GO Home
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 13:52 (Ref:3928526)   #95
johnh875
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 2,540
johnh875 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by leothedrummer View Post
I can't agree with this - number one priority when talking about a safety car should be exactly that....safety. Not competition or entertainment. If a safety car is needed, it should be deployed immediately. If safety car deployment can wait a lap or two so as to not mess up the race, then the safety car wasn't needed in the first place.

And if it isn't "fair" to deploy immediately, then it isn't "fair" to deploy later....there's always going to be someone getting shafted, but that's something that should come down to bad luck, not a conscious decision to help one party but not another.
Don't disagree at all, which why the system needs to be revised. We've seen the safety car wait to pick up the leader after some reasonably big crashes in the past, yet here they could have waited but didn't. The SC was still needed for the recovery, when it was called before the car got moving again that is, and this one was not typical in that more often cars are stopped in dangerous positions.

I think they need to have more options to use, absolute focus on safety where necessary, but where urgent response is not needed a system to minimise interference with the race result.
johnh875 is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2019, 15:43 (Ref:3928542)   #96
S griffin
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,367
S griffin is going for a new world record!S griffin is going for a new world record!S griffin is going for a new world record!S griffin is going for a new world record!S griffin is going for a new world record!S griffin is going for a new world record!S griffin is going for a new world record!
It’s a shame that had to happen. Hopefully it can be avoided in the future. It’s always best when it picks up the leader. Of course it’s harder with dangerous situations, but not all of them are, some aren’t even needed. The SC does some good, but needs it’s problems to be ironed out
S griffin is offline  
__________________
He who dares wins!
He who hesitates is lost!
Quote
Old 18 Sep 2019, 02:46 (Ref:3928609)   #97
Axeman444
Veteran
 
Axeman444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Australia
Calling a spade a spade...
Posts: 4,117
Axeman444 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAxeman444 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The issue is Drivers are incentivised to race back to the Safety Car, remove that and the problem goes away.

Code 60 anyone?
Axeman444 is offline  
__________________
In the words of the Great Forrest Gump: I'm not a smart man, but at least I know where the Dog on the Tuckerbox is
Quote
Old 18 Sep 2019, 08:48 (Ref:3928653)   #98
banksie
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 436
banksie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Speedcafe have done an analysis of where the cars were when the safety car was called. Link

Might help to reduce some of the confusion around here.
banksie is offline  
__________________
banksie!!!
Quote
Old 18 Sep 2019, 11:05 (Ref:3928666)   #99
slugger
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 38
slugger should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by banksie View Post
Speedcafe have done an analysis of where the cars were when the safety car was called. Link

Might help to reduce some of the confusion around here.
It is no longer an analysis of fact when the author injects their own opinion.
It is therefore, an opinion piece, which is less credible.
slugger is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Sep 2019, 12:15 (Ref:3928679)   #100
Woolley
Race Official
Veteran
 
Woolley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
England
Wolverhampton, England
Posts: 12,447
Woolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandgroper View Post
"While I knew I wasn’t the leader of the race, and despite my engineer confidently telling me over the radio to not get held up by the safety car, the lights in front of me were orange"
Doesn't that translate as 'RC got it right at the time and JW ignored the signal'? I'm presuming as in other series, Green means pass, orange means don't. Even if he wasn't the leader, the orange light might well have been for other safety reasons as in needing to get the cars under control NOW.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axeman444 View Post
Code 60 anyone?
Or FCY, whatever you call it. As a marshal, I've experienced both, they work well.
Woolley is offline  
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other.
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[VASC18R28R29] ITM Auckland SuperSprint Pukekohe 2-4 Nov Razor Australasian Touring Cars. 142 11 Nov 2018 23:30
[VASC17R23R24] ITM Auckland SuperSprint, Pukekohe:3-5 Nov GTRMagic Australasian Touring Cars. 124 9 Nov 2017 21:45
[VASC16R28R29R30R31] ITM Auckland SuperSprint, Pukekohe: 4-6Nov GTRMagic Australasian Touring Cars. 92 12 Nov 2016 07:08
[iV8SC15R28R29R30] ITM 500 Auckland, Pukekohe: 6-8 Nov GTRMagic Australasian Touring Cars. 123 11 Nov 2015 23:00
[iV8SC14R10111213] ITM Auckland 500, Pukekohe -24-27 April GTRMagic Australasian Touring Cars. 112 1 May 2014 16:29


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.