Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Baltic Touring Car Championship Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Touring Car Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 Aug 2008, 19:21 (Ref:2275142)   #1
helgi
Veteran
 
helgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Russian Federation
Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russian Fe
Posts: 1,546
helgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Let that REAL CARS work for an hour (not 15 minutes) and without 50 kilo handicaps but with a strict technical regulations for EVERYBODY instead. We'll see what a dull race it's going to be I hope there'll be thousand or two thousands of REALCARSfans from all over the world to watch that astounding event :-):-):-)
helgi is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Aug 2008, 21:16 (Ref:2275219)   #2
Bramzel
Veteran
 
Bramzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Netherlands
Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,153
Bramzel should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridBramzel should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridBramzel should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepits!
Yep - isn't it great - so what that it doesn't look like a 'road-going' car - what PROPER racing car does?
Its supposed to be a touringcar. The whole purpose of touringcar racing is that they resemble roadcars. Like DTM did in the past, when it was still worthy the name.
Bramzel is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Aug 2008, 09:45 (Ref:2275464)   #3
Helmpflicht99
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Germany
near Bremen
Posts: 22
Helmpflicht99 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Hello !!!

The only good Race in this Season was the last Race on the Nürburgring. A chaos Qualifying, a chaos-strategy from Audi and a really cool Race from Ekström, Scheider and Paul di Resta (Luck for Schneider, that the Race wasn´t 1 Lap longer). The other 6 Races of the Season were really boring. Esspacially the Norisring-Race was a big disappointment. 4 Cars (Green, Spengler, Ekström & Scheider) were close together at the last 10 Laps. And what happened ???

Nothing !!!
No Overtaking (not even an attempt). That wasn´t very exciting. And Norisring is a Course where you can see many overtaking-manouvers (but not this year). Brands Hatch Indy isn´t it. And so I think we will see another boring Race.

I hope that the new technical rules of the DTM make the cars more like the "old DTM-Style" (stable and fast Cars).
Helmpflicht99 is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Aug 2008, 09:33 (Ref:2276151)   #4
Valenok
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 257
Valenok should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helmpflicht99
the cars more like the "old DTM-Style" (stable and fast Cars).
Group A or Class 1?
Valenok is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Aug 2008, 11:27 (Ref:2276210)   #5
Helmpflicht99
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Germany
near Bremen
Posts: 22
Helmpflicht99 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valenok
Group A or Class 1?
Group A (but a modern Group A). The best Time of the DTM was with the Group A. With the "Class 1"-Cars, the DTM starts to go too expensive. And this ends in the ITC-Death 1996.

The Cars we´re now have are like the old "Class 1 Cars". and that´s not good.
Helmpflicht99 is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Aug 2008, 13:53 (Ref:2276280)   #6
Valenok
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 257
Valenok should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helmpflicht99
Group A (but a modern Group A). The best Time of the DTM was with the Group A. With the "Class 1"-Cars, the DTM starts to go too expensive. And this ends in the ITC-Death 1996.

The Cars we´re now have are like the old "Class 1 Cars". and that´s not good.
1. Modern Group A is known as S2000 Group A - Superturism - S2000
2. The best time with Group A had end in 1992 when 2 of 3 makes decide to go on
3. DTM starts to go too expensive a little bit earlier - when manufactureres entered championship and private teams go on. 1987-1988. But, ofcause, Class 1 continued tendence of rising costs
4. Nowdays cars are not like old Class 1 - their development is frozen due to save costs. But it's not enough to attract private teams.
Valenok is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Aug 2008, 14:08 (Ref:2276290)   #7
werner
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2006
Netherlands
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Posts: 1,706
werner should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridwerner should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valenok
1. Modern Group A is known as S2000 Group A - Superturism - S2000
Is S2000 not evolved out of superproductionrules, ie that a superproductioncar can be changed at point X, Y and Z, to make it a S2000-car?
That's technically though. 'Spiritually', you are right. S2000 is the top-class for productionbased 2l-cars.
werner is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Aug 2008, 07:55 (Ref:2276730)   #8
Helmpflicht99
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Germany
near Bremen
Posts: 22
Helmpflicht99 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valenok
1. Modern Group A is known as S2000 Group A - Superturism - S2000
Yes, but I mean "faster" S2000-Cars. There´s some discussion on the DTM.com-Forum about it. The Fans there don´t like the S2000 because the cars are too slow for them. Maybe the DTM needs a Reglement like the V8-Supercars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valenok
2. The best time with Group A had end in 1992 when 2 of 3 makes decide to go on
BMW was against the Class 1 Reglement. And Audi protests against the Rule-Changes that put Audi in the middle of the Field (The ITR bans the new crank shaft).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valenok
3. DTM starts to go too expensive a little bit earlier - when manufactureres entered championship and private teams go on. 1987-1988. But, ofcause, Class 1 continued tendence of rising costs
4. Nowdays cars are not like old Class 1 - their development is frozen due to save costs. But it's not enough to attract private teams.
That´s right. The DTM was too expensive (1 Car: 1996 = 500.000 €) and today it´s expensive, too (1. Car 2008 = 750.000 €).
Helmpflicht99 is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Aug 2008, 08:42 (Ref:2276743)   #9
Valenok
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 257
Valenok should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helmpflicht99
1.Maybe the DTM needs a Reglement like the V8-Supercars.

2.And Audi protests against the Rule-Changes that put Audi in the middle of the Field (The ITR bans the new crank shaft).

3.The DTM was too expensive (1 Car: 1996 = 500.000 €) and today it´s expensive, too (1. Car 2008 = 750.000 €).
1.V8-Supercars has a little connection with production based cars - they have serious body modifications and new engine-transmission group.
If you see Superstar's, they have more strong connections, but they have debates about handycap system - it wasn't hard to predict
2.Theese rule-plays are common things in touringcar racing - car's can't be equal, and every attempt to equalize them is doubtful
3.So we need another silhouett-prototype reglament, with lower costs and stronger connection with road-car's.
Valenok is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Aug 2008, 10:09 (Ref:2276774)   #10
Helmpflicht99
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Germany
near Bremen
Posts: 22
Helmpflicht99 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valenok
3.So we need another silhouett-prototype reglament, with lower costs and stronger connection with road-car's.
The ITR works on a new Reglement for 2010. But this needs new manufactures. With Mercedes and Audi will Citroen, BMW and Lexus/Toyota work on the new Reglement, too (I´ve heard and read).

But Renember 1993. 5 manufactures worked on the "Class 1 Reglement" (Mercedes, Audi, BMW, Opel & Alfa-Romeo). But only 2 raced in 1993 (Mercedes & Alfa-Romeo). Opel had his "Comeback" at the Season-Final 1993.

So this Time the ITR needs some guarantee for 2010. That means: "We need more manufactures !". No Manufactures, no new Reglement !!!

Last edited by Helmpflicht99; 28 Aug 2008 at 10:11.
Helmpflicht99 is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Aug 2008, 11:39 (Ref:2276809)   #11
Valenok
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 257
Valenok should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helmpflicht99
The ITR works on a new Reglement for 2010. But this needs new manufactures.
I think, we need new reglament in any case - with or without new manufacturers.
Cutting aerodynamic (overtaking ability), money saving and new sport regulations - problems are named and they demand decision anyway
Valenok is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Aug 2008, 11:48 (Ref:2276813)   #12
Helmpflicht99
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Germany
near Bremen
Posts: 22
Helmpflicht99 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
This is not from me. The ITR tries to catch some new manufactures with the new Reglement. They mean that Audi and Mercedes are to good in this Series. It needs a new Reglement that they all Start at "0 %" and everyone has the same chances.
Helmpflicht99 is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Sep 2008, 19:19 (Ref:2281079)   #13
helgi
Veteran
 
helgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Russian Federation
Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russian Fe
Posts: 1,546
helgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
And what changes should be done? Make another TCC? There's DTC (or something about that) and it's so popular in German,you know...
Maybe,there're MarsTouringCarChampionship or JupiterTouringCarsChampionship,I don't know. But,it's too boring to watch the same cars all over the World. If I'm going to Kent I want to see Leeds Castle but not the Eifel Tower. Where's the variety?And the main question,where's the nations unique specials? What does WTCC smells now? With diesel? Now it's an incomprehenciale medley. There's no self-identify. Leave BTCC and STCC. That two TCC smell real racing (I really think so,no smiles) even with SEAT buses at the grid.
And German main championship was a special technical thing always.
What it should be? An extra-S3000 with huge weight and inertia moment?
Well,it needs only some aerodynamics haircut and only one mandatory pit-stop. Nothing else. Maybe,some tracks like Sachsenring.
We don't need another TCC. We need DTM at its best.
helgi is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Sep 2008, 19:54 (Ref:2281110)   #14
duke_toaster
Veteran
 
duke_toaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
European Union
Englandland
Posts: 5,100
duke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridduke_toaster should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Here is my suggestion for new DTM rules.
duke_toaster is offline  
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier."
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2008, 15:51 (Ref:2281624)   #15
thepits!
Veteran
 
thepits!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
England
England
Posts: 1,423
thepits! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridthepits! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke_toaster
"At least 2500 fully identical units must have been produced in 12 consecutive months and homologated by the FIA in Touring Cars (Group A). Supply Variants"
thepits! is offline  
__________________
Cats know your every thought.

But don't care.
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2008, 22:25 (Ref:2281969)   #16
Alex K
Veteran
 
Alex K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
United Kingdom
England
Posts: 1,713
Alex K has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Let them enter group in LMS, kill DTM, we'll have more cars in FIA GT or LMS. Porsches, Ferraris, Mercedes' and Audi (probably R8s instead of A4s) with protos (if under LMS rulling), this would be one hell of a series.
Alex K is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Sep 2008, 18:58 (Ref:2282984)   #17
helgi
Veteran
 
helgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Russian Federation
Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russian Fe
Posts: 1,546
helgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Splendid idea. There're too many racing series in the World. Let's give every team identical cars!

It's the best way to say something is rubbish if you don't want or can not undertand it. Or you just envy that DTM events usually collect more spectators than touring racing. It's too special and you need to love it or to be an engineer to understand it.
If you are looking for some show,than 15-minutes bus and granny's car racing is an evidient choice.
helgi is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Sep 2008, 07:18 (Ref:2284349)   #18
stedevil
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Sweden
Posts: 1,545
stedevil has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Mmmm, Audi R8's racing... *Drools*
stedevil is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Sep 2008, 09:07 (Ref:2284447)   #19
KA
Veteran
 
KA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,402
KA has a real shot at the podium!KA has a real shot at the podium!KA has a real shot at the podium!KA has a real shot at the podium!KA has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by helgi
And what changes should be done? Make another TCC? There's DTC (or something about that) and it's so popular in German,you know...
Maybe,there're MarsTouringCarChampionship or JupiterTouringCarsChampionship,I don't know. But,it's too boring to watch the same cars all over the World. If I'm going to Kent I want to see Leeds Castle but not the Eifel Tower. Where's the variety?And the main question,where's the nations unique specials? What does WTCC smells now? With diesel? Now it's an incomprehenciale medley. There's no self-identify. Leave BTCC and STCC. That two TCC smell real racing (I really think so,no smiles) even with SEAT buses at the grid.
And German main championship was a special technical thing always.
What it should be? An extra-S3000 with huge weight and inertia moment?
Well,it needs only some aerodynamics haircut and only one mandatory pit-stop. Nothing else. Maybe,some tracks like Sachsenring.
We don't need another TCC. We need DTM at its best.
On the other hand, if you look at the last 25 years, what were the peaks in touring car racing? Group A and Supertouring, when you had a basic ruleset that was applicable worldwide, and a manufacturer could homologate a car and race it almost anywhere from the UK to Australia and Japan- and there were still cars that were only ever seen in one particular series. Right now the whole scene is much too fragmented
KA is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Sep 2008, 11:41 (Ref:2284598)   #20
Valenok
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 257
Valenok should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by KA
On the other hand, if you look at the last 25 years, what were the peaks in touring car racing? Group A and Supertouring, when you had a basic ruleset that was applicable worldwide, and a manufacturer could homologate a car and race it almost anywhere from the UK to Australia and Japan- and there were still cars that were only ever seen in one particular series. Right now the whole scene is much too fragmented
It's rather difficult in our days to race in different series, despite on common tech reg. We don't see many british, sweden, german and italian championship participants in world and other championships.

But I think, it would be nice to see silhouetts not only in DTM)
For example, in some endurance races, like Nurburgring 24h and so on)
Valenok is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Sep 2008, 13:37 (Ref:2284704)   #21
helgi
Veteran
 
helgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Russian Federation
Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russian Fe
Posts: 1,546
helgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The fact is everything became business now. Of course,I can not know if it was the same thing in 70's. But from today's point of view that was an amazing era of wonderful racing with rich enthusiasts, interesting design decisions...
Well,the progress in heavy industry now steps forward and it's too expensive to suggest a really interesting design decision.
Every tenth cut from a lap time costs millions and millions euro. From this point of view it's practically impossible to imagine really liberal regulations for designers, 'watchable' for spectators, acceptable for owner's pockets.
So, championships with strict (mostly on paper) regulations are popular. But difficulties makes us stronger. We'll intent something I'm sure.

As for 'show in the races'. As one russian autosport historian says 'Spectator should know it's place!'. Let's fix one thing. Are races held for spectators,or races held for teams and drivers to check what mix of pilot-car is best in certain conditions?

If it's a show then there's nothing strange in handicaps, different regulations for different teams and so on. I'd like to watch Olympic 100m final with Bolt carrying bag of potatos or Argentinians winning one-leg-jumping-football match.

Last edited by helgi; 8 Sep 2008 at 13:43.
helgi is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Sep 2008, 13:48 (Ref:2284709)   #22
stedevil
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Sweden
Posts: 1,545
stedevil has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valenok
It's rather difficult in our days to race in different series, despite on common tech reg. We don't see many british, sweden, german and italian championship participants in world and other championships.
Full seasons in multiple championships, which often has overlapping race weekends, is of course difficult to do by a driver.

But we regularly see about half a dussen STCC drivers in selected WTCC races, especially in the late season when the STCC has ended. And eg Tommo is this year trying to do both WTCC and DTC. To this add the DTC team that lately has been at WTCC meetings and wasn't there a Adac Procar team present once as well? And Russians, they keep poping up in this or that championship from time to time (and I assume we would see a lot more of this if visa and bordercrossings were a lot less tedious).
stedevil is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Sep 2008, 13:57 (Ref:2284713)   #23
KA
Veteran
 
KA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,402
KA has a real shot at the podium!KA has a real shot at the podium!KA has a real shot at the podium!KA has a real shot at the podium!KA has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valenok
It's rather difficult in our days to race in different series, despite on common tech reg. We don't see many british, sweden, german and italian championship participants in world and other championships.

But I think, it would be nice to see silhouetts not only in DTM)
For example, in some endurance races, like Nurburgring 24h and so on)
It's not just about competitors taking in races in other series though- put yourself in a manufacturers' position- you can either build a DTM car which is basically only usable in Germany, or you can put your money behind an S2000 car for the WTCC, and potentially have programmes run and backed by your local importer or agent in the BTCC, STCC, DTC, ADAC Procar etc.....
KA is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Sep 2008, 19:02 (Ref:2284961)   #24
helgi
Veteran
 
helgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Russian Federation
Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russian Fe
Posts: 1,546
helgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
It always depends on what markets are the most important for the makes. Audi didn't start 'R15' project for Le Mans till they have finished today's DTM Rocket.
Chinese market is very important for Mercedes and Audi. So,DTM is going to step there soon. Russian market is very big too.
Besides,Germans don't want their cars to compare with cheap sedans. Both AMG and S-line cars are three times more expensive than Leon or Lacetti (not saying about Lada-proto).
Bavarians are not happy with strange Technical Bureau (or how it's called I don't know) politics. BMW if not kept on a chain would be 10 seconds faster than any other touring car,because of perfect base car. They just need identical technical regulations.
But I'm sure they don't enter DTM even they are talking about new regulations with M&A. They really need races all over the World. So,the right step for them - GT.
I expect Lexus to join DTM in 2010 as it's luxurious car and needs some advertisement in Europe.
helgi is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Regulations youngoldy Club Level Single Seaters 2 26 Oct 2007 19:22
Spotters Guides : BTCC, WTCC, SCC and DTM (DTM added) andy_b Touring Car Racing 19 10 Oct 2007 19:53
Regulations Edmonton Formula One 12 14 Dec 2003 12:42
Superkart Regulations 18000rpm Kart Racing 5 19 Mar 2003 02:38
New Regulations Cobra Formula One 7 7 Mar 2003 06:15


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.