|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Aug 2005, 12:20 (Ref:1382675) | #1 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
OFFICIAL: Williams - Cosworth 2006
Williams have confirmed they'll have Cosworth engines next year.
They say it's not just an engine deal but a "joint R & D project involving the entire drivetrain". Good to see it made official. |
|
|
15 Aug 2005, 12:23 (Ref:1382677) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
What will the team be called. Because i was told, sometime ago now, that Williams were going to run Cosworth engines, but be called Lexus.Williams F1?
Anyways. Good to see something made official in the world of F1 rumours, thats one of the list. Performance. Williams airbox has severly hampered the BMW engine which has not been able to show its true colours, so for me, it really depends whether the aero department can turn around rather than whether the engines can perform. But no doubt Cosworth have a decent package. |
|
|
15 Aug 2005, 12:28 (Ref:1382681) | #3 | |||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Quote:
Quote:
Er, the airbox is part of the engine... |
|||
|
15 Aug 2005, 12:28 (Ref:1382682) | #4 | |||||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,600
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
15 Aug 2005, 12:35 (Ref:1382689) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
So if you mess it up, you are basically stuck with it. Kicking-Back....i meant air inlet, sorry for confusion. Easily done on my behalf. Well as far as naming it Lexus.WilliamsF1 it was related to running re-badged Cosworth engines. Im sure the Williams can still be named Lexus. But it does have its complications. Its easier to be wrong than right. |
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 12:35 (Ref:1382690) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,909
|
i was gonna say that adam..if it was hampering the engine then they would have changed it by now!
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 12:50 (Ref:1382706) | #7 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Good fit from two no nonsense racing organisations.
Patrick Head notes that they both 'speak the same racing language' - couldn't agree more and a departure from the strained corporate relationship of the past few years, which Williams (IMO) were never cut out for. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
15 Aug 2005, 12:55 (Ref:1382714) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,382
|
I seem to think that we will see a Hyundai Branded Cosworth Next year.
|
|
__________________
... without motorsport, what is sport? |
15 Aug 2005, 12:59 (Ref:1382717) | #9 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 269
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:05 (Ref:1382724) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
Also through CFD a smaller air inlet will show aerodynamical gains which is logical, but a smaller air inlet does not have a big as performance edge, as a bigger air inlet does. and it impedes on all those other factors. Was the wind tunnel out,was this a mistake by the technical squad? OR a combination of both? The air inlet design has also got something to do with when the cars stop spinning their wheels. I cant remember exactly what, but ill try and find out. But a V8 is a totally totally new chassis design, so lets hope they get it right. |
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:10 (Ref:1382729) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,003
|
Their air inlet has been the same (& the smallest of grid too interestingly...) for years & years I doubt it is suddenly a problem?
|
||
__________________
FALCON UNBELIEVABLE |
15 Aug 2005, 13:14 (Ref:1382733) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 897
|
Great to see that Williams have the deal done and dusted. I tell you what will these guys be motivated are what to beat BMW nest year.
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:15 (Ref:1382734) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
And it is smaller than last years. Whilst this year other teams have gotten larger. A change in trend, and Williams were left behind..... perhaps. |
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:18 (Ref:1382736) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,324
|
Let's hope this will be successfull (unlike with the Hart / Arrows' association or taking over of Hart by Arrows). Does anyone know what happened of the Hart engine & organization by the way?
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:22 (Ref:1382739) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:22 (Ref:1382740) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:34 (Ref:1382754) | #17 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
It didn't go bust as such, Brian Hart retired.
As for Williams - Cosworth, they're referring to it as a "blue chip partnership", so I don't expect a different badge on the engine. |
|
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:48 (Ref:1382769) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,324
|
It looks to me like a multi-years partnership. Is it? If so, I take it that this brings to an end the rumour about engine supply by Toyota in 2007. If it is only a one year contract then I think this is just a positive way of saying that Williams will pay to have a customer Cosworth engine for 2006.
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:52 (Ref:1382772) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
I dont know, im over thinking about drivers for today. I just hope the Cosworth can producers a peerler of an engine and get that Williams towards the pointy end of the field, and maybe help drag Minardi off the floor. I think Williams challenge is more achieveable for Cosworth. |
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 13:54 (Ref:1382774) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
As a die-hard Williams fan I'm pretty pleased about this, although I'd be daft not to be sceptical about their chances of success in the shorter term. I like the sound of it though, and I have been very impressed (considering the disadvantages they started with) with the Red Bull package this year.
The press release puts it pretty neatly when it mentions speaking the same kind of racing language - that comes as a breath of fresh air considering the poncy corporate mentality that prevails these days (or have I just contradicted myself in commending them for using crappy PR speak, albeit in order to run-down crappy PR speak?). When BMW were new kids on the block and hitting hard with the most powerful engine out there I could put up with their shiny tuetonic face, but for preference I'll take the traditional oily Williams engineering image any day. It will be a long time until the season opens next year, but I look forward to Williams-Cosworth sticking it to BMW and Theissen with some relish. |
|
|
15 Aug 2005, 14:11 (Ref:1382786) | #21 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
It looks like very much a partnership in terms of input and funding, which is essential bearing in mind how integrated the car and engine package needs to be nowadays.
You have to think that Williams are taking more of longer term view with Cosworth, perhaps they have an option for Toyota for 2007 which has to be taken up mid 2006, which gives time for SFW to assess their options and performance. On the face of it there seems little sense commiting funding and team resources to an engine project for only one season, particularly when no one yet knows which V8 will be better than the others - it may well be that the cossie is the class of the field, in which case Williams will have a coup on their hands... Looks like a good hedge to me, that may see Williams powered by Cossies for longer than 2006. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
15 Aug 2005, 14:34 (Ref:1382804) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 14:35 (Ref:1382805) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,192
|
I think Cosworth will be a good partner for Williams. Cosworth has a huge experience with V8-engines.
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 14:36 (Ref:1382807) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Cosworth's performance early in 2006 will not be representative of how they can do longer-term once everyone else has had more practice at running V8s, but it's a good short-term option at the very least. Whether Button's contract is only valid if Williams have works engines is open to debate, but frank insists that it doesn't.
|
||
|
15 Aug 2005, 15:07 (Ref:1382821) | #25 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 262
|
Lets unlease some british beef
|
||
__________________
"I wonder what the fastest anybodys been in the Eurotunel train?" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Williams-Cosworth 2006 (reports merged) | Kicking-back | Formula One | 35 | 3 Aug 2005 07:37 |
Cosworth V8 for 2006 on dyno | emjaya | Formula One | 49 | 18 Jul 2005 20:34 |
cosworth 2006 ? | Mike_Wooshy | Sportscar & GT Racing | 13 | 15 Jul 2005 15:48 |
Minardi to run Cosworth V10 engines in 2006 | Ryo28 | Formula One | 29 | 10 May 2005 18:31 |
It's Official - KK Buys Cosworth... | GP Racer | IRL Indycar Series | 21 | 22 Nov 2004 15:46 |