Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > National & Club Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:20 (Ref:2580330)   #26
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 205dave View Post
Should someone be brave enough to fit one of the BMW K1100 heads to the A series Block, would the same rule apply ?
yes
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:23 (Ref:2580331)   #27
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdwoody View Post
not quite , the pugs are class D unless they are 2001cc+ and 16v,same with the astra .
so far i think bahr ,ronchetti ,richards, me cant think of any more atm..
class c will also get the 2.0xe powered nova thats been in class A but running near the back of the grid,

the new rules will allow some engine swaps without automatically putting the cars in class A, as such cars will also be reclassified as being 50% bigger in CC.

i will be class D as although my engine is 2467cc, its only 8valve
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:24 (Ref:2580334)   #28
rww
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
United Kingdom
St Leonards on Sea, East Sussex
Posts: 159
rww should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 205dave View Post
Ok, Makes perfect sence now. Sounds Fair to me.

So my car being 1925cc would now be class D, not C is this correct ?
Assuming your car is a Peugeot 205/309 (?) then :-

if 8v will be class E (up to 2L dual valve)
if 16 v will be class D.(up to 2L multivalve)

.......I think..
rww is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:24 (Ref:2580335)   #29
Tim Falce
Race Official
Veteran
 
Tim Falce's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
England
Very edge of S E London almost in Kent
Posts: 11,142
Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!
Tim Falce is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:26 (Ref:2580336)   #30
205dave
Rookie
 
205dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
England
lydd kent
Posts: 54
205dave should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham bahr View Post
vehicles with multivalve cylinderheads other than mass production ones as fitted on a factory assembly line, i.e for fords pintos warrier and holbay, for a series engines jack night and KAD heads a 50% multiplication factor will be applied to othe engine capacity,

this is the same rule currently applied to sequential gearboxes and will also be extende tp apply to cars running center lock wheels

So The 7 & 8 port heads, although aftermarket would not count as heavily
modified because they only have 2 valves per cylinder ?
205dave is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:27 (Ref:2580339)   #31
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdwoody View Post
not quite , the pugs are class D unless they are 2001cc+ and 16v,same with the astra .
so far i think bahr ,ronchetti ,richards, me cant think of any more atm..

engines i can see why, but center lock wheels ? are we doing pit stops next year ????
center lock wheels mean bespoke race uprights and hubs, in other words very expensive parts which are normally only found on no expense spared cars which in terms of cost and performance are beyond the average clubman
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:29 (Ref:2580341)   #32
bdwoody
Veteran
 
bdwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
United Kingdom
redbridge southampton
Posts: 1,276
bdwoody should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
as i said then me and bill as joss wont be at every round...doh .now wheres that standard f7r engine again..
bdwoody is offline  
__________________
WOODY
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:35 (Ref:2580344)   #33
bdwoody
Veteran
 
bdwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
United Kingdom
redbridge southampton
Posts: 1,276
bdwoody should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by BESSIE View Post
give me a tow down the straights woody xxx
i''l fit the hook in the morning ...
bdwoody is offline  
__________________
WOODY
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:44 (Ref:2580347)   #34
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 205dave View Post
So The 7 & 8 port heads, although aftermarket would not count as heavily
modified because they only have 2 valves per cylinder ?
you got it
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:49 (Ref:2580351)   #35
rww
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
United Kingdom
St Leonards on Sea, East Sussex
Posts: 159
rww should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdwoody View Post
not quite , the pugs are class D unless they are 2001cc+ and 16v,same with the astra .
so far i think bahr ,ronchetti ,richards, me cant think of any more atm..
Agreed on the Astra- will be Class D. Not sure about the 205's though as looking at results from the first round Richard Brent's is shown as 2045cc which would make it new Class C as would be Graham Bahr's 2.3 BMW.
rww is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:52 (Ref:2580353)   #36
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
richards car this year was 2045cc but only 8valve as is my bmw,

of course if either were to be fitted with 16v heads then they would become class C assuming the engine sizes stayed the same
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 20:57 (Ref:2580355)   #37
rww
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
United Kingdom
St Leonards on Sea, East Sussex
Posts: 159
rww should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham bahr View Post
richards car this year was 2045cc but only 8valve as is my bmw,

of course if either were to be fitted with 16v heads then they would become class C assuming the engine sizes stayed the same
Thanks Graham, I stand corrected.
rww is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:06 (Ref:2580357)   #38
greenamex2
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,686
greenamex2 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Whilst I understand the series decision to try and reduce costs to the competitor the changes do seem to have a heavy impact on certain competitors/vehicles.

In Classic Thunder we intentionally allowed head/complete engine changes in order to allow certain cars to compete more competitively, and often at reduced cost.

For example my cars engine would cost half as much if it was replaced with a Ford, and it would be more reliable.

Out of interest, who gets to decide who needs 'penalising' for being too quick.
greenamex2 is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:08 (Ref:2580359)   #39
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Out of interest, who gets to decide who needs 'penalising' for being too quick.
actually no one "decides" its done strictly by the rules regarding the cars specification,

if somone comes up with a demon modification which wipes the floor with everyone provided its legal they will be able to run in the same class all year with it,
whether the rules change the next season would be another matter
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:12 (Ref:2580361)   #40
bdwoody
Veteran
 
bdwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
United Kingdom
redbridge southampton
Posts: 1,276
bdwoody should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
he he, you should stand for parliment with a statment like that graham..lol
bdwoody is offline  
__________________
WOODY
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:12 (Ref:2580362)   #41
Copperbottom
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 775
Copperbottom has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Hmm,the new rules may blow my plans for next year out of the window!.................................................What class would my car go in IF I went semi-spaceframed and super silhouette spec red-top? Or one or the other?
Copperbottom is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:15 (Ref:2580364)   #42
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Copperbottom View Post
Hmm,the new rules may blow my plans for next year out of the window!.................................................What class would my car go in IF I went semi-spaceframed and super silhouette spec red-top? Or one or the other?
you get to go off and play with the intermarque boys
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:16 (Ref:2580365)   #43
bdwoody
Veteran
 
bdwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
United Kingdom
redbridge southampton
Posts: 1,276
bdwoody should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
1998cc 16v megane with £40k ex alan menu motor from sodemo in class D ......i think that would raise an eye brow !!!!!! lol
bdwoody is offline  
__________________
WOODY
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:20 (Ref:2580367)   #44
205dave
Rookie
 
205dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
England
lydd kent
Posts: 54
205dave should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham bahr View Post
actually no one "decides" its done strictly by the rules regarding the cars specification,

if somone comes up with a demon modification which wipes the floor with everyone provided its legal they will be able to run in the same class all year with it,
whether the rules change the next season would be another matter

So on average Bill and Richard run a similar pace, But Bill moves up class and Richard moves down.

So surely somebody decided to move Bill up
205dave is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:21 (Ref:2580368)   #45
Copperbottom
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 775
Copperbottom has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham bahr View Post
you get to go off and play with the intermarque boys
That might just happen But please note I said SEMI spaceframe,ie: just the front or the rear section would be tube.

Also what IF I just fitted a red top?
Copperbottom is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:22 (Ref:2580369)   #46
bdwoody
Veteran
 
bdwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
United Kingdom
redbridge southampton
Posts: 1,276
bdwoody should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 205dave View Post
So on average Bill and Richard run a similar pace, But Bill moves up class and Richard moves down.

So surely somebody decided to move Bill up
ok it was me
bdwoody is offline  
__________________
WOODY
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:24 (Ref:2580372)   #47
Copperbottom
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 775
Copperbottom has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 205dave View Post
So on average Bill and Richard run a similar pace, But Bill moves up class and Richard moves down.

So surely somebody decided to move Bill up
I think that you'll find that Richard only moves down because this years C becomes next years' D,Bill will still be in class D for 2010 (or class C 2009)
Copperbottom is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:26 (Ref:2580373)   #48
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
if he sticks with the same engine richard wont of moved anywhere just the class letter has just changed,

yes bill car will of moved class but so have several others, lets not forget richard is using a mass production 205 head, of course if you preferred the origonally proposed rule change which would of put bill in class A....................................
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:27 (Ref:2580374)   #49
bdwoody
Veteran
 
bdwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
United Kingdom
redbridge southampton
Posts: 1,276
bdwoody should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo dont leave me bill i dont want to be on me own i will get lonely and cry ..
bdwoody is offline  
__________________
WOODY
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2009, 21:29 (Ref:2580376)   #50
Copperbottom
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 775
Copperbottom has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdwoody View Post
noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo dont leave me bill i dont want to be on me own i will get lonely and cry ..
I'm sure someone will play with you Woody

Last edited by Copperbottom; 11 Nov 2009 at 21:37.
Copperbottom is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DMN 2009 andypipe National & Club Racing 274 3 Mar 2009 17:02
DMN Silverstone 31st May chezza National & Club Racing 135 11 Jun 2008 17:04
DMN Lydden 8th September chezza National & Club Racing 195 28 Sep 2007 13:25
DMN or DMSN Alan Cherry National & Club Racing 27 14 Apr 2007 20:04


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.