|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 Sep 2022, 12:05 (Ref:4125108) | #151 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,849
|
Quote:
I think if RBR could be fully independent now, they would do it vs. trying to find a partner. Or, they are capable, but by brining in a partner helps spread the cost of fully getting up to speed. Then it allows both sides to benefit. RBPT grows, etc. (outlined above) and the partner gets the marketing and other benefits they are looking for. Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
6 Sep 2022, 12:21 (Ref:4125112) | #152 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,549
|
It looks like it was Red Bull who got cold feet over the Porsche deal. They now have the time and resources to develop their own power units for 2026 according to the article linked below. They also have plenty of time to find another partner to badge their power units if they need to.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/wh...ater/10364612/ I wonder what Porsche will do now, there are a number of teams they could partner with if they so wish or will they go to there old stomping ground of the WEC. |
|
|
6 Sep 2022, 13:06 (Ref:4125116) | #153 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
|||
|
6 Sep 2022, 14:40 (Ref:4125124) | #154 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,449
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
6 Sep 2022, 14:43 (Ref:4125127) | #155 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,383
|
With their sister brand Audi entering F1, Porsche probably see less reason for entering. So there’s every chance it won’t happen now. But I was never going to believe until it was actually confirmed
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
6 Sep 2022, 14:59 (Ref:4125131) | #156 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
Quote:
|
||
|
6 Sep 2022, 16:07 (Ref:4125139) | #157 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,083
|
Quote:
So yes; the Merc F1 engines were developed in-house, but it's not quite as simple as it looks. That said, in F1, is *anything* as simple as it looks? |
||
__________________
Walk a mile in someone else's shoes. When they realise you have, you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes. |
6 Sep 2022, 20:55 (Ref:4125159) | #158 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
|||
|
7 Sep 2022, 01:57 (Ref:4125172) | #159 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
Quote:
The ICE part is most probably not a major hurdle but the increasingly developing electrical side sure is and not many companies have the experience besides Porsche. My prediction is that RB will use any means possible to strong arm Honda into a deal. It maybe that RBPT was put together after Porsche began to show interest and if that was the case and the deal has now fallen over RB might have a problem. The usual disciaimer: Read the above with a large amount of salt ready |
||
|
7 Sep 2022, 02:10 (Ref:4125175) | #160 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,275
|
You seem to have a much higher opinion of Porsche capabilities compared to most!
|
|
|
7 Sep 2022, 02:52 (Ref:4125176) | #161 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,476
|
Quote:
This was years back, still the V8 era. Couple of years to go if I recall, in the period where a lot development was frozen. However they still had a V6 to show, and I guess very different and a few iterations before the race debut version. They stole a march on the others because they were better prepared. Developing even before everything in the rules were final. The changes in 2026 aren’t as dramatic, but aren’t insignificant so whoever ends up supplying the new PUs needs to be on it soon. Not making out I know anything. Just whenever the push rod engine is mentioned it always reminds me of two examples of them getting a technical advantage. |
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
7 Sep 2022, 07:59 (Ref:4125191) | #162 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
Please feel free to tell us your opinion of Porsche. To put it another way are you saying that RB would be foolish to want Porsche as a partner in RBPT? You may well be right but your reasoning would be interesting to me at least.
|
|
|
7 Sep 2022, 08:06 (Ref:4125192) | #163 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,275
|
Quote:
I doubt Porsche would really go it alone, and that would certainly conflict with their historical style. RB could easily retain Honda or even do a deal with anyone who wants to badge the engine for a significant budget contribution. |
||
|
7 Sep 2022, 08:58 (Ref:4125198) | #164 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Quote:
I think that's the problem. Porsche seems not to be interested if their only role is to pay and put their name on the engine and somewhere on the car. (And probably be blamed by H. Marko if they don't win; And if they do it's all Red Bull that get the credits -- see Renault) |
|||
|
7 Sep 2022, 10:23 (Ref:4125205) | #165 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,275
|
Quote:
|
||
|
8 Sep 2022, 10:18 (Ref:4125292) | #166 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
It would be interesting to see who made the first move to form some sort of partnership as there have been some suggestions that RB have been trying to get VW interested in a deal since the Renault days and it was always rejected because of animosity between some people in both groups. It has also been suggested that the Porsche/RBPT talks have only advanced since the leadership of VW has changed so there could be some truth in the stories. That two dominant companies within their respective fields could not come to an agreement should surprise no one especially when one is supposed to be subject an upcoming IPO. My take is RB need a company of Porsche or Honda's capability to make RBTP successful.
|
|
|
9 Sep 2022, 08:29 (Ref:4125386) | #167 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,549
|
Porsche have confirmed the proposed partnership with Red Bull as talks have been called off.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/po...deal/10365986/ |
|
|
9 Sep 2022, 08:37 (Ref:4125387) | #168 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,383
|
Wonder which side the break down happened? Either way, I'm not surprised. The talks didn't progress as much as early signs would have suggested. Not disappointed, as I wasn't prepared to believe it till it happened
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
9 Sep 2022, 09:06 (Ref:4125394) | #169 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Quote:
I'm glad that deal doesn't go ahead. |
|||
|
9 Sep 2022, 10:07 (Ref:4125397) | #170 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,651
|
I wonder if this is an indication that Honda is having a(nother) about-turn with it's plans to withdraw from F1 and they'll carry as a partner with Red Bull?
|
||
__________________
Incognito: An Italian phrase meaning Nice Gearchange! |
9 Sep 2022, 10:12 (Ref:4125398) | #171 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,531
|
Seeing as RBR have spent the last 12 months building their own engine department and employing loads of people on that side of things, it seems that if Honda do another Zig-Zag it would be too late for them to carry on with RBR.
|
||
__________________
It's just my opinion. |
9 Sep 2022, 17:34 (Ref:4125445) | #172 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,383
|
I would be surprised if any engine manufacturer will want to work with RBR.
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
9 Sep 2022, 20:29 (Ref:4125457) | #173 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Quote:
I don't remeber where but I saw Hyundai's name pop up. All you need to do is pay and you will get your name on the engien, and on the rear wing. |
|||
|
10 Sep 2022, 08:55 (Ref:4125491) | #174 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,722
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Sep 2022, 12:34 (Ref:4125517) | #175 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
Horner playing media games again and trying to be his own spin doctor
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/ho...ject/10366723/ And I am trying to put this bit into English or at least the English I understand He also indicated that the Porsche deal collapsed in part because of the limited amount of technical help that the manufacturer would provide, given the knowledge of the staff it had already recruited. He just about admits they need an OEM as a partner though he says they don't, spin away Christian. He also admits the project has passed the point of no return and has to continue. The whole article is full of double speak but Marko reckons that the OEM starters are already on the phone and lining up for the job. To sum up RBPT needs more technical help but does not need an OEM though they are lining up at the gate and banging on the front door. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] Why can't the Toyota group and Volkswagen group use secondary brands in LMP2 | Marcus666 | ACO Regulated Series | 10 | 18 Jun 2013 16:45 |
Group 2/Group 1/Group A Anom(a)lous Cars | Al Weyman | Motorsport History | 40 | 22 Aug 2012 22:09 |
Porsche to take control of Volkswagen | Mal | Sportscar & GT Racing | 20 | 6 Mar 2008 07:18 |
Are there any differnces between a Porsche carerra cup Porsche and GT3 class Porsche? | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 25 | 6 Feb 2008 21:06 |
The Official "Porsche is NOT owned by Volkswagen" Thread! | Muzza | Sportscar & GT Racing | 10 | 4 Apr 2002 21:22 |