|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
8 Sep 2018, 06:03 (Ref:3848808) | #676 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 13
|
It's funded fully by TRS right now. #5 only registers for Shanghai and Sebring for the rest of the season but the #6 will be present to all races. If it's funded by Ginetta then they must have the Ginetta drivers on the car, but they're not.
|
||
__________________
F1 & LMP Aero Williams Racing & TRS Manor |
8 Sep 2018, 08:40 (Ref:3848824) | #677 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,396
|
So there should be one Ginetta at Fuji. That's good, at least they still have things in place to run at least one car for now
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
8 Sep 2018, 09:16 (Ref:3848829) | #678 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 486
|
Quote:
https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/ginetta-lmp1-returns-in-35-car-fuji-entry-list/ |
||
|
9 Sep 2018, 00:49 (Ref:3848946) | #679 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,451
|
There is a lot of enthusiasm around an entry that is not 100% granted to take part of the event. We saw what happened at Spa. Most people think it is “see to believe” but, in WEC nowadays, it is actually “believe to see”. In science, eye witness evidence is the poorest form of proof...they tell us.
Like it were supposed to be both cars in the season start and we know the end of the story. The real one, not what some media tried to lecture us. |
|
|
9 Sep 2018, 02:17 (Ref:3848961) | #680 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,290
|
||
|
9 Sep 2018, 03:15 (Ref:3848978) | #681 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,570
|
Quote:
|
||
|
9 Sep 2018, 06:48 (Ref:3848993) | #682 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Within all this talk, I really hope they have a decent race and result. Only Le Mans is on the car's record so far and it wasn't really something to write home about. Maybe the new engine helps the car but I'm not expecting miracles. If they're in contention with the Dragonspeed car I would say that's a reasonable success.
|
|
|
9 Sep 2018, 07:14 (Ref:3848996) | #683 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,396
|
I hope they get a respectable result in the next round too, just to show their efforts weren't in vain
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
9 Sep 2018, 07:58 (Ref:3849001) | #684 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 486
|
||
|
11 Sep 2018, 10:32 (Ref:3849346) | #687 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
Let's be honest...it's not a huge surprise.
I think there's a lot of weird and unanswered questions right now, that may not get shaken out. The engine saga was blamed on the customer - Ginetta said the arrangement was a customer choice, not a Ginetta choice (although they then publically slated the engine anyway). So now Manor isn't in the picture, are TRSM calling the engine shots, or are Ginetta? This also explains why we're down to one car. They said they were ready for Silverstone but denied an entry for what amounted to admin reasons. So you'd expect them to be ready with two cars for Fuji, but only one has turned up. Seems that the switched effort has cost them a car. That car better perform or the project is pretty doomed. They wanted to sell 10 cars, but now it's essentially a factory effort, and they've already swapped to an engine that's known to perform well (although it does have a habit of exploding). So if the car is off the pace then I can't see many customers opting for it. |
|
|
11 Sep 2018, 20:15 (Ref:3849471) | #688 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
We'll have to watch for the branding and advertising on the car at Fuji. Maybe get a clearer picture of who's funding this effort.
|
|
|
11 Sep 2018, 22:38 (Ref:3849504) | #689 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,490
|
The most interesting part of the Autosport story is probably this:
Quote:
Of course, this also raises the question why the Ginetta-funded car didn’t race at Spa… |
|||
__________________
“Sometimes there’s no poison like a dream.” — Tanya Donelly |
11 Sep 2018, 22:41 (Ref:3849506) | #690 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Sep 2018, 00:18 (Ref:3849514) | #691 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
The real question is WHY engage in this ruse? Nobody's going to question a manufacturer running their own car in an effort to prove it's worth to prospective customers, but parking both cars for the cover-up reason provided can easily make their product look bad(Regardless of actual quality). |
|||
|
12 Sep 2018, 00:26 (Ref:3849517) | #692 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
If Ginetta was going to fund the second car for the first 3 races, maybe they figured since the car didn't get to feature at all until Le Mans they wanted to show their product to make it sell in the future. This is possibly why they decided to continue on with their funding for just the one car the rest of the season. I think they should put their best efforts forth with the single entry to appeal to anyone looking to run it in a team.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2018, 07:51 (Ref:3849547) | #693 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,396
|
So will Ginetta now take full control of the team?
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
12 Sep 2018, 13:57 (Ref:3849626) | #694 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,490
|
Apparently yes and no.
Yes: It would seem that Ginetta will be the entity responsible for actually running the car. No: Per Autosport: Quote:
And: Quote:
Last edited by TheMightyM; 12 Sep 2018 at 14:04. |
||||
__________________
“Sometimes there’s no poison like a dream.” — Tanya Donelly |
12 Sep 2018, 15:49 (Ref:3849652) | #695 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,157
|
I just don't see the logic in this.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2018, 18:06 (Ref:3849683) | #696 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,997
|
It’s all nuts, but Ginetta have clearly realised they have two options- 1- run and fund the car themselves 2- don’t run the car and waste every penny they have invested in the programme so far. If they can’t show their performance soon they have no chance of selling cars |
|
|
12 Sep 2018, 18:40 (Ref:3849691) | #697 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,396
|
I think it’s now or never in Fuji then
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
12 Sep 2018, 22:56 (Ref:3849739) | #698 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Fuji and Shanghai. They're so close together and the Asian market could be a good place to shine since the sponsor or investors home market is in the area.
|
|
|
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 (Ref:3849819) | #699 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 22
|
Met an ex-Ginetta insider at a motorsport event last weekend who reckons the LMP1 dream was doomed from the start and the penny (several hundred million of them) has finally dropped at Ginetta HQ. Key sales, marketing and PR personnel have departed since Le Mans and the LMP1 has virtually disappeared from Ginetta’s website and social media.
Sadly, I fear the Ginetta LMP1 is more likely to join LMP3 and GT3 in the company mausoleum than race again in WEC. |
||
|
13 Sep 2018, 10:48 (Ref:3849825) | #700 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 832
|
Sadly, i totally agree with this sentiment. As the entire WEC grid was Containered up and shipped straight after Silverstone, if Ginetta are to be present at Fuji, they'd have needed to arrange Air Freight after their initial testing in the UK, so even more expense. A real shame.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ginetta G8 F3 car from 1964 | Sprint | Motorsport History | 11 | 29 Sep 2014 20:28 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |
Ginetta Racing | Redlake27 | National & Club Racing | 9 | 29 Oct 2003 12:23 |
Ginetta G12P | tonyabacus | Motorsport History | 2 | 2 Aug 2002 07:44 |