Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 Dec 2001, 04:04 (Ref:188620)   #1
Buckshot
Veteran
 
Buckshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Cambridge Gardens, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,632
Buckshot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridBuckshot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Big Bangers ?

Just a question that has puzzled me over the last few weeks.

Why do they refer to Group C as the last of the big bangers or similar names ?

Cheers Buck.
Buckshot is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2001, 04:15 (Ref:188623)   #2
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
To whom do you refer?

"They" is probably Mike Raymond, who seemed to lament the passing of Group C and thought it meant a downgrading of the cars... but they still got quicker.

There was a conception that Group A rules were more restrictive, but in things like brakes they were less restrictive. In fact, a relaxing of Group C rules in the dying days saw those cars fitted with the Group A brakes.

There was a return to more normal bodywork, though...
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2001, 06:38 (Ref:188638)   #3
Buckshot
Veteran
 
Buckshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Cambridge Gardens, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,632
Buckshot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridBuckshot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Was up at Mt Panorama last week and heard the term used during the little 15min doco they show you on the way into the museum.

Have also heard the term ebefore and wondered what was the go.
Buckshot is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2001, 11:39 (Ref:188677)   #4
mtpanorama
Veteran
 
mtpanorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Australia
Bathurst (best racetrack in the world)
Posts: 2,485
mtpanorama should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
And here is one of the Best "Big Bangers"
mtpanorama is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Dec 2001, 11:55 (Ref:188684)   #5
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The Group C cars had enormous wheels and body kits. The Group A cars ran standard bodywork and much smaller whels. Hence the cars looked smaller and had less presence. Around Bathurst the Group C cars were also 6 seconds a lap faster than the Group A cars.

Where the Group C cars had a full interior and production based brakes and suspension etc. The Group A cars were gutted inside with purpose built racing gear underneath. The Group A regs though were more restrictive under the bonnet
DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Dec 2001, 00:49 (Ref:188931)   #6
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Group C looking back were a great set of rules, pity i was 1 when it finished. Pity also that homologation bickering led to it's downfall, although group A was a suitable replacement.

Group C and Group A weren't all that different in aims. Both tried to get many different types of car to be competitive, although Group C seemed to slighly favour big capacity normally aspirated cars, while Group A favoured small capacity turbo charged cars. Also Group C was much cheaper.

I heard mike Raymond refer to them as 'big bangers' on the last lap of Bathurst 1984. I have read that back in '83/'84 there was a bit of media criticism that the cars didn't look like road cars and so on.
racer69 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Dec 2001, 04:10 (Ref:188962)   #7
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
One of the major things affecting the NA vs turbo was the homologation requirement. Group A had the FIA homologation rules, Group C our own, with (I'm sure) a lower qualifying number.

The flare kits were as designed by a local entrant or two, then accepted by CAMS and made mandatory... I think it was Garry Willmington and Murray Carter who had most input into the XD stuff.

The wheels weren't much bigger, I don't think. 10" was the maximum width anyway, I'm fairly sure. For sure, Sierras suffered due to this, especially after the Eggenberger cars were ruled out...
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
stock cars and bangers btcc-lad Trackside 4 4 Mar 2004 18:02
Big Bangers are back! Crash Test Australasian Touring Cars. 3 7 Jul 2002 12:39


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.