Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 Oct 2002, 17:13 (Ref:414810)   #1
Mr V
Veteran
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
The city of bridges (one day!)
Posts: 13,211
Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!
Williams :- success ballast a last resort

from www.autosport.com

Team boss Frank Williams has stated that he'll accept the use of success ballast in Formula 1, but only as a last resort and if it can be shown to be in the best interest of the sport.

Success ballast is one of those up for discussion. It has been suggested following Ferrari's steamrollering of the 2002 champion – it scored exactly half of all the points on offer. Williams agrees that the sport needs to provide the spectacle of racing at the head of the field, but is wary of a knee-jerk reaction.

"Max and Bernie are harrying the teams like a pack of hounds terrorising a flock of sheep, he told The Sun. "I just hope there will be plenty of clear thinking. As a last resort I would agree to the adding of ballast for success but only if it was demonstrated this was the only element which would save Formula 1."

Last edited by Mr V; 27 Oct 2002 at 17:14.
Mr V is offline  
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man!
Quote
Old 27 Oct 2002, 17:46 (Ref:414828)   #2
Sato san
Veteran
 
Sato san's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
United Kingdom
Posts: 5,602
Sato san should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSato san should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
might as well be a touring car championship then !

Frank and Patrick know their stuff.......last resort only !
Sato san is offline  
__________________
MOTOR RACING ...The general idea is that the driver behind uses all his Skills, Tricks and Courage to try and overtake the guy ( or Girl ) in front !
Quote
Old 27 Oct 2002, 18:43 (Ref:414862)   #3
JonesF1
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location:
Myrtle Beach, SC USA
Posts: 459
JonesF1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Williams already uses weight ballasts - their drivers.
JonesF1 is offline  
__________________
"What's the point? We have no power. Are we going to put 'Loser' on the sidepod for a sponsor?" - John Menard
Quote
Old 28 Oct 2002, 10:32 (Ref:415322)   #4
Glen
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
Glen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGlen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGlen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Williams are trying to get BMW into a corner. No self-respecting big player (like BMW) would prefer a handicapped formula - they want to win on merit, just like Mercedes and Ferrari. By spinning the situation a little (with this hint by Patrick Head) Williams are asserting their authority as a team over BMW (just a supplier) and pushing them that little bit harder into making a bigger investment. BMW can't have their say in the future of F1 unless they put more into it.
Glen is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Oct 2002, 11:10 (Ref:415347)   #5
z2252314
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location:
Australia
Posts: 493
z2252314 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Williams are trying to get BMW into a corner. No self-respecting big player (like BMW) would prefer a handicapped formula - they want to win on merit, just like Mercedes and Ferrari. By spinning the situation a little (with this hint by Patrick Head) Williams are asserting their authority as a team over BMW (just a supplier) and pushing them that little bit harder into making a bigger investment. BMW can't have their say in the future of F1 unless they put more into it.
They better not push too hard. If I where Williams, the last thing I would want to do is pi$$ off BMW even more.
Williams need BMW more than BMW need Williams IMO.
z2252314 is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Oct 2002, 11:18 (Ref:415353)   #6
Glen
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
Glen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGlen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGlen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Yea but where are BMW going to? Out of F1 completely is more likely than to another team, and doing their own chassis is a total non-starter if you ask me.

I suppose Sauber might be available at some point in the future - but when you see what little results they managed with Ferrari power you start to realise what a great job Williams have been doing.

Renault is Renault, Jag is Ford, BAR is Honda... when you look at it BMW should be bloody grateful to be where they are. Second place in this field is no disgrace at all, and if a team falls out of the top three its a hell of a long way back to the top.
Glen is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Oct 2002, 12:16 (Ref:415398)   #7
JonesF1
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location:
Myrtle Beach, SC USA
Posts: 459
JonesF1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Glen
I suppose Sauber might be available at some point in the future - but when you see what little results they managed with Ferrari power you start to realise what a great job Williams have been doing.

Renault is Renault, Jag is Ford, BAR is Honda... when you look at it BMW should be bloody grateful to be where they are. Second place in this field is no disgrace at all, and if a team falls out of the top three its a hell of a long way back to the top.
Sauber is using de-tuned engines (though they might have got more power after THAT incident). But I agree theyre not that great of a team and not many teams, if any, need a new engine. Engine deals come and go, anything can happen it just depends on how despeate BMW is.
JonesF1 is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Oct 2002, 12:30 (Ref:415409)   #8
Glen
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
Glen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGlen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGlen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I thought they were full spec, but one revision behind the main team all the time. ie using 2001 engines in 2002.
Glen is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Oct 2002, 16:57 (Ref:415618)   #9
Sato san
Veteran
 
Sato san's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
United Kingdom
Posts: 5,602
Sato san should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSato san should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i thought the same as Glen !..infact im sure that is the case .
Sato san is offline  
__________________
MOTOR RACING ...The general idea is that the driver behind uses all his Skills, Tricks and Courage to try and overtake the guy ( or Girl ) in front !
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
74 Ranch Resort Returns!!! Patrick B Sportscar & GT Racing 15 29 Oct 2004 19:28
Success Ballast ? The Badger Sportscar & GT Racing 13 19 May 2004 14:08
50% of Williams success due to tyres racingdad Formula One 27 2 Dec 2003 00:52
Success Ballast and Driver Changes Carrie Touring Car Racing 3 26 Aug 2001 22:53
How about Success Ballast? Super Tourer Formula One 8 13 Jun 2000 22:35


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.