|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
28 Jun 2008, 06:38 (Ref:2239121) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 814
|
Possible Force India-Honda in '09?
If anyone has read http://www.f1complete.com recently, they would've seen a story about a possible engine supplier change for 2009. Force India and Honda officials were seen talking to each other during I think it was the Canadian GP? Sounds interesting, what does anyone else think? Rumours, or the Real McCoy?
|
||
__________________
"We had to cut speeds or else we would've ended up disappeared up our own arses!" Derek Warwick on turbos. |
28 Jun 2008, 07:32 (Ref:2239142) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
well what next RBR talking to Merc, probably just rumours but F1 is strange.
|
||
|
28 Jun 2008, 10:40 (Ref:2239217) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,263
|
Does it really matter what engine you run these days? They're pretty much the same anyway, and there's no development work going on. Maybe they want to become the new Super Aguri, but with more money and being a constructor. Would be excellent for Honda as they would then occupy grid spaces 17-20...
|
|
__________________
Michael Delaney was wrong. In between is not waiting - in between is the glory, the passion. In between is what elevates racing. |
28 Jun 2008, 15:11 (Ref:2239290) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,246
|
Honda are probably looking to fill the production void left by Super Aguri.
Ferrari are notorious for their engine supplies. Theres always claims of receiving inferior equipment, or a high price tag achieved. I wonder though if a significantly cheaper Honda engine would offset losing possibly the most powerful engine on the grid, and maybe by a margin. And of course theres the disclaimer of giving Sato a seat. But if Honda are paying his wages... If it did happen you also have to wonder if someone else would jump on the 3rd Ferrari supply. The FIA might retract Ferrari's right to supply a 3rd team, as everyone else is restricted to 2 teams. If the customer car loopholes werent getting closed up you'd think maybe Red Bull would try and get both their teams using Ferrari engines. |
||
|
28 Jun 2008, 15:55 (Ref:2239302) | #5 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
|
||
|
28 Jun 2008, 16:53 (Ref:2239322) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
An inferior Ferrari engine, if true, would still be better than a Honda engine ain't it?
Force India would need to evaluate what is their primary need. If it is cost-savings, yes, Honda will probably give a similar package with a low price. They would also get a driver "free". This may free up some added millions to pump into their development. However, is it sound? Force India has worked hard to show that they are serious. Signing Ferrari adds a "touch" of marketability/glamour for the team, and having Fisichella/Sutil/Mike on board helped to show they are serious. Reverting to taking on a paid-driver (however good) may affect the way the team is seen. Ferrari engines have always been priced on a slightly high side. Yet, they have consistently provided customer engines. Other engine manufacturers chose to offer their engines at a lower rate because they need to attract customers. Ron/Mercedes had once proposed $10mil engines but they didn't materialize. Others do not have the sufficient facilities/support team to give continual and consistent service The rumoured "iinferior" einges supplied by Ferrari are not justified criticisms. Ferrari engines have consistenly been the best, or among the best. Ferrari often provide customers the same engine as the Works team at the start of the season, but as Ferrari had a quick pace of development, naturally, Ferrari Works team get the upgrades first. Still, the customer teams are given their contracted upgrades and support by the special department created to service customer teams. However, Ferrari engines are known to be "difficult" to work with because the Ferrari engines are designed to be fully integrated with the chassis/car packageof the Work car down to the details. This meant that there is a very small margin for compromise, and teams like Torro Rosso and Spkyers had issues initially to overcome the problem, leading to some engine failures. The unique packaging is also the reason why Newey opted to go for Renault engines for RBR, (which he states are easier to work with), and why Ferrari provided Sauber the complete rear end of the car for one of the customer years. Force India may do well to economize, and perhaps going to Honda is beneficial simply because it may be a easier option to work with and due to commercial considerations. What i may be concerned with however is that any deals made for 2009 will be seen as a bit too late. Even if the deal is concluded by end of July, Force India will be left with just 6months to adapt their 2009 designs to a new engine parameter. It may be a risk. Last edited by Gt_R; 28 Jun 2008 at 16:55. |
||
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to." |
28 Jun 2008, 17:05 (Ref:2239330) | #7 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Another reason for changing is that Ferrari's KERS is reportedly integrated into the entire engine/gearbox structure.This may prove to be too costly for FI to purchase and maybe keeping a seperate line of production open just for the engine would not be cost effective for Ferrari?
|
|
|
28 Jun 2008, 21:02 (Ref:2239418) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,087
|
Ferrari paying the ultimate price for one of their drivers stupidity at Monoco by hitting a customers car, if the story is true maybe VJ was more upset than first thought....
|
|
|
28 Jun 2008, 21:42 (Ref:2239430) | #9 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
Quote:
Really ? |
|||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
29 Jun 2008, 01:37 (Ref:2239499) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 485
|
i think sato ahve to be the luckiest driver in f1,just being japanese help him,he not a world champion or even a race winner but it seems that everytime a team gets honda engines he get to drive with that team,first honda then super aguri now maybe force inda.
|
||
__________________
GO NEWMAN-HAAS-CHAMPIONS-2004-05-06 and 2007. |
29 Jun 2008, 06:56 (Ref:2239546) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 814
|
If Sato were to go the Force India path for as long as they're powered by Honda, that wouldn't help Vijay Mallya's conquest to have an all-Indian driver line-up. That is just what it keeps coming back to for me, all-Indian drivers driving for his team. But if Mallya were to go for slightly cheaper engines, such as Hondas, he might have to call off his plans for some time. Mike Gascoyne has worked on Honda engines before (they were Mugen-Hondas though), so he's had some experience with them, although I don't know how long he was at Jordan for.
Last edited by TilkeWannabe; 29 Jun 2008 at 07:02. |
||
__________________
"We had to cut speeds or else we would've ended up disappeared up our own arses!" Derek Warwick on turbos. |
29 Jun 2008, 11:33 (Ref:2239636) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
Obviously, from Honda's point of view, $25 million or whatever the cost is would benefit Honda greatly as opposed to having to foot the bill for SA. |
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
29 Jun 2008, 12:26 (Ref:2239659) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,246
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
29 Jun 2008, 18:26 (Ref:2239890) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
30 Jun 2008, 01:12 (Ref:2240130) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 814
|
Good point, should've known they were V10s before I posted it. I did but I didn't, if you know what I mean.
|
||
__________________
"We had to cut speeds or else we would've ended up disappeared up our own arses!" Derek Warwick on turbos. |
30 Jun 2008, 03:15 (Ref:2240152) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,910
|
I think I would actually see this as viable
Losing a few hosre power is not going to effect FI as much as the benefit in an extra $10 million (or whatever) in areo development. Net gain. |
||
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive. |
2 Jul 2008, 14:20 (Ref:2242239) | #17 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 69
|
If Force India are trying to cut costs for next season, looking to Honda as engine supplier would be a good start.
Ferrari are current engine suppliers, yes, but they are last seasons engines or 2008 spec? Also as someone said if Vijay Mallya wants an all indian driver line up, he will be hard pressed, wont he? Only one indian driver springs to mind, Karthykayen (sp).... what his name!!! |
|
|
3 Jul 2008, 03:43 (Ref:2242767) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 814
|
Karun Chandhok (of GP2 Asia Series fame) too. He's on the Red Bull Young Driver list for 2008.
|
||
__________________
"We had to cut speeds or else we would've ended up disappeared up our own arses!" Derek Warwick on turbos. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Force India caught with McLaren designs! | mjstallard | Formula One | 5 | 14 Jun 2008 14:07 |
Fisichella and Force India. | ralf fan | Formula One | 23 | 20 Apr 2008 10:49 |
Force India livery | 429CJ | Formula One | 47 | 1 Jan 2008 13:14 |
Who will get the second Force India seat? | cds_uk | Formula One | 47 | 29 Nov 2007 01:04 |
Asian F3 Champion to receive test in Force India F1 Car | Asa | National & International Single Seaters | 20 | 24 Nov 2007 21:40 |