Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 Jun 2004, 02:20 (Ref:1007508)   #1
Schummy
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Schummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location:
Somewhere near 2nd Lagrangian point
Posts: 3,259
Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!
Reliability after Canada

Renault had a bad day, McLaren and Jordan got two cars in the finish line.
Code:
Ferrari 100% 0
Toyota   94% 1
Williams 88% 2
Sauber   88% 2
Renault  88% 2
Jaguar   75% 4
BAR      75% 4
Minardi  63% 6
McLaren  56% 7
Jordan   56% 7
---------------
General  78% 35
Renault has lost its perfect status and now Toyota is the second king of the hill.

Everyone is doing a good job this year, except Minardi, McLaren and Jordan, but, of course, Minardi and Jordan have last year's engines, thus all the finger point to Mac.

Disqualifys by rules are not counted as unreliability, then Williams and Toyota have had a perfect record this round.
Schummy is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jun 2004, 12:43 (Ref:1007842)   #2
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Firstly, this belongs in the F1 forum, not the bikes.

Secondly, to have a reliable car, you ahve to build one that can complete the race distance legitimately and be in the hunt for poitns after 190-odd miles, so the Toyotas and Williams have to count as unreliability.

Thirdly, surely the reliability stats don't look qutie so bad for Mclaren, because they're having to develop new machinery, rather than using tried-and-trusted stuff?

Nice set of stats all the same.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jun 2004, 19:37 (Ref:1008205)   #3
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Tried and trusted in a season where they didn't have to run one engine all weekend long?
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 18 Jun 2004, 20:32 (Ref:1008265)   #4
davebreen
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Ireland
Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 110
davebreen should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Reliability after Canada

Quote:
Originally posted by Schummy

Everyone is doing a good job this year, except Minardi, McLaren and Jordan, but, of course, Minardi and Jordan have last year's engines, thus all the finger point to Mac.
I thought Jordan were running the same engine as Jaguar and only Minardi on are last years engine?
davebreen is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jun 2004, 20:35 (Ref:1008267)   #5
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Dave Breen is right.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Jun 2004, 02:28 (Ref:1008421)   #6
Schummy
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Schummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location:
Somewhere near 2nd Lagrangian point
Posts: 3,259
Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!Schummy has a real shot at the podium!
Boots:

No, Will and Toy DNQs definitively don't have to count as unreliability problems. As maximum, it could be considered as race not done, but in this case I don't think so. The cars were reliable, although they were illegal, I don't want to mix different things.

Another thing is the question when a driver has an incident and leave the race in the first lap or so. Even in this case, again it doesn't count as unreliable, but as race not done, and then the denominator to calculate percentages must be changed. But I don't make currently that kind of correction.

About Mac, yes, they are playing with new parts, but... precisely it shows how bad they have done when they have to do it in the middle of the season
Schummy is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is reliability in F1 a bad thing? DougK Formula One 19 11 Nov 2004 19:43
Mclaren: Reliability perminder Formula One 17 11 Nov 2004 19:36
Reliability after Imola Schummy Formula One 10 30 Apr 2004 15:37
F1 Reliability Wrex Formula One 23 11 Aug 2003 07:46
So much for F2001's reliability....LOL BBKing Formula One 10 3 Apr 2002 14:51


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.