Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Club Level Single Seaters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 Jun 2005, 18:48 (Ref:1330750)   #1
foreversideways
Veteran
 
foreversideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
England
Bramhall
Posts: 2,132
foreversideways should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridforeversideways should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Anglesey 25th/26th June

Just got my documents for Anglesey. What is going on . One 15 minute qualifying session on Saturday. Last time we had one 20 minute session and one 15 minute session on Sunday.
foreversideways is offline  
__________________
"Racing is Life. Anything before or after is just waiting"
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 18:55 (Ref:1330761)   #2
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Yes, but I think you will find that there is a lot more to get through than last time as well. Normally with double-headers you only get one session, at the last meeting the Sunday session was more padding than anything else!
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 20:15 (Ref:1330895)   #3
diz
Veteran
 
diz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
England
Cheshire
Posts: 3,843
diz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreversideways
Just got my documents for Anglesey. What is going on . One 15 minute qualifying session on Saturday. Last time we had one 20 minute session and one 15 minute session on Sunday.
Panic not Raymondo. I'll get on the case next week.
diz is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 20:52 (Ref:1330975)   #4
Redracer77
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Didsbury/Chorley
Posts: 3,446
Redracer77 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If they have more to get through then why is the price the same........should be less
Redracer77 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 20:53 (Ref:1330977)   #5
foreversideways
Veteran
 
foreversideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
England
Bramhall
Posts: 2,132
foreversideways should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridforeversideways should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well done Diz. North West FF trouble shooter !!
foreversideways is offline  
__________________
"Racing is Life. Anything before or after is just waiting"
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 20:56 (Ref:1330987)   #6
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redracer77
If they have more to get through then why is the price the same........should be less
Or to put it another way, it should have been more for the last event as that meeting was too thin! This is more like a capacity race meeting that everyone would hope for...
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 21:06 (Ref:1331007)   #7
Redracer77
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Didsbury/Chorley
Posts: 3,446
Redracer77 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
what so FF1600 should subsidise the rest of the meeting then as we both had full grids...
Redracer77 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 21:15 (Ref:1331022)   #8
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
FF1600 entry fees should be the same as for all other classes. It is not the fault of your fellow competitors in other series if a full grid is not obtained: it should be down to the organisers to merge grids and fill the programme to make the meeting more financially viable. Punishing competitors does nothing to increase entry levels.
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2005, 21:59 (Ref:1331109)   #9
Walshy
Veteran
 
Walshy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
England
Lancashire
Posts: 1,338
Walshy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think you have all overlooked the fact that the bl00dy T-Cars are at the meeting.

All hail the rich kids.........
Walshy is offline  
__________________
A new Middle East Crisis erupted last night as Dubai TV refused to broadcast 'The Flintstones'. A spokesman said, "Dubai citizens wouldn't understand the humour, but those in Abu Dhabi Do!".
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 08:24 (Ref:1331323)   #10
StephenRae
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Wales
North West
Posts: 871
StephenRae should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Sowman
FF1600 entry fees should be the same as for all other classes. It is not the fault of your fellow competitors in other series if a full grid is not obtained: it should be down to the organisers to merge grids and fill the programme to make the meeting more financially viable. Punishing competitors does nothing to increase entry levels.
That is b0ll0cks. I am sick of watching grids sometimes in single figures droning around. The onus should be on the competitors to pay in proportion to the costs. it is up to them to get together with other formulae to increase their grids, if we don't have enough to make two races we all race together.
I have just hired a road car for one day... 3 of us using it £10 each, were I on my own £30.
StephenRae is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 08:32 (Ref:1331325)   #11
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
But if you apply that, new championships would never get off the ground. Look at something like MaX5 - attracting grids in the mid-teens last year, and now 35 cars this. It is one of the success stories of 2005 so far.

The clubs run the meeting, and the onus should be on them to make the meeting viable by charging a fair entry fee to all competitors and getting as many cars on the grids as possible. Otherwise you get into a horrible, descending spiral.

And we must not forget that two of the championships that are having the poorest entry levels in the country this season are for FF1600.
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 08:55 (Ref:1331342)   #12
StephenRae
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Wales
North West
Posts: 871
StephenRae should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I must admi that I don't know what a Max5 is...but I do remember a couple of years ago watching 4 or 5 New Fiestas 'racing' whilst on the same day XR2s and 3s were crammed together with reserves not racing. IMHO this was an effort to start a new category which would make money for those supplying the cars and kits. It seems that there is an invisible layer of promotors who are hell bent on making current formulae obsolete and putting the entire burden on the competitor.......aided and abetted by the motoring press.
StephenRae is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 09:00 (Ref:1331346)   #13
Redracer77
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Didsbury/Chorley
Posts: 3,446
Redracer77 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Sowman
But if you apply that, new championships would never get off the ground. Look at something like MaX5 - attracting grids in the mid-teens last year, and now 35 cars this. It is one of the success stories of 2005 so far.

The clubs run the meeting, and the onus should be on them to make the meeting viable by charging a fair entry fee to all competitors and getting as many cars on the grids as possible. Otherwise you get into a horrible, descending spiral.

And we must not forget that two of the championships that are having the poorest entry levels in the country this season are for FF1600.
Very true point Ian but SOM doesn't seem to have the drivers due to the lack of quality circuits on the bill and MSV was put together too late and had far to many rounds, the average FF1600 driver can't commit to all those rounds the only people that have are young drivers learning circuits (Lay, Mayes and Dempsey) and Stuart Kestembaum!!!
Redracer77 is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 09:05 (Ref:1331350)   #14
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Stephen - MaX5 is the championship for Mazda MX5s.

Chris - Donington not a quality circuit? And it isn't all that long ago that SoM at Mallory had reserves... It is just swings and roundabouts really. The strength of the NW championship - and it is strong with good reason - has probably drawn some cars away from it.
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 09:11 (Ref:1331356)   #15
Redracer77
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Didsbury/Chorley
Posts: 3,446
Redracer77 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I love Donny & Silverstone Ian but the SOM is mainly a Mallory Championship and as Jase pointed out on your other thread it is not one of the drivers favs.....
Redracer77 is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 09:15 (Ref:1331358)   #16
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Only 2 out of 22 drivers (last time I checked) said they wouldn't race there though...
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 09:53 (Ref:1331382)   #17
Walshy
Veteran
 
Walshy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
England
Lancashire
Posts: 1,338
Walshy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Answer me this one then Ian.

With infinitely more cars at Anglesey than the first round their in May, why is the entry fee the same?

With the TCars being there, I understand that they get the track time they get through some sponsorship deal that covers the cost of their inflated track time. So they cover themselves.

With all the other races on this meeting, the club stand to make a tidy profit from this, unless the last Anglesey ran at a loss, which I very much doubt.

Also, according to your previous post in this Thread of only one Qualifying at the start of the weekend, we always, always had a qualifying on each day at Anglesey. I can understand they may be limited on track time with the number of races, but with that in mind, the cost should have been adjusted accordingly.

If you went to a restaurant and order a 12oz steak and when they brought it out, they said they only had enough left for an 8oz, you wouldn't pay for the 12oz would you.......


Mmmmmmm........Steak................

Erm sorry, drifted off there for a moment..
Walshy is offline  
__________________
A new Middle East Crisis erupted last night as Dubai TV refused to broadcast 'The Flintstones'. A spokesman said, "Dubai citizens wouldn't understand the humour, but those in Abu Dhabi Do!".
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 13:17 (Ref:1331506)   #18
foreversideways
Veteran
 
foreversideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
England
Bramhall
Posts: 2,132
foreversideways should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridforeversideways should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I wonder which will be the most exciting races at Anglesey ??. Think we all know, don't we.
foreversideways is offline  
__________________
"Racing is Life. Anything before or after is just waiting"
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 13:25 (Ref:1331515)   #19
Redracer77
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Didsbury/Chorley
Posts: 3,446
Redracer77 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It is a digrace that we are expected to pay £265 for 2 x 15 minute races only one qualifying.

Why don't they put us as first race and last race on sat so we don't have to bother waiting over till Sunday for just a 15 min race.......
Redracer77 is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 13:26 (Ref:1331517)   #20
Walshy
Veteran
 
Walshy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
England
Lancashire
Posts: 1,338
Walshy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Isn't that cake in your picture missing a zero after the five mate?????

Walshy is offline  
__________________
A new Middle East Crisis erupted last night as Dubai TV refused to broadcast 'The Flintstones'. A spokesman said, "Dubai citizens wouldn't understand the humour, but those in Abu Dhabi Do!".
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 13:49 (Ref:1331543)   #21
jminsh
Veteran
 
jminsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
England
Not far from Oulton Park
Posts: 1,301
jminsh should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redracer77
Why don't they put us as first race and last race on sat so we don't have to bother waiting over till Sunday for just a 15 min race.......
Coz they've done that with one of the ford races on Sat and the XR'S on sunday.!!

The Southerners in the Ford's have the Sat slot !!! FIFO i say Fit In or F**k Off .Should be the same for all.2 races over 2 days.
jminsh is offline  
__________________
2002,2008 and 2010 SPA 6 hours winner
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 13:59 (Ref:1331555)   #22
Walshy
Veteran
 
Walshy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
England
Lancashire
Posts: 1,338
Walshy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Wooooo get you!!!!!!!!

Walshy is offline  
__________________
A new Middle East Crisis erupted last night as Dubai TV refused to broadcast 'The Flintstones'. A spokesman said, "Dubai citizens wouldn't understand the humour, but those in Abu Dhabi Do!".
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 14:00 (Ref:1331558)   #23
Redracer77
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Didsbury/Chorley
Posts: 3,446
Redracer77 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I am not sure I am that bothered with racing then. Snetterton MSV would be good fun
Redracer77 is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 16:08 (Ref:1331666)   #24
JohnMiller
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Rutland
Posts: 3,069
JohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
You like Snett but not Mallory?
JohnMiller is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2005, 16:14 (Ref:1331669)   #25
Redracer77
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Didsbury/Chorley
Posts: 3,446
Redracer77 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yes, I quite like Snett
Redracer77 is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anglesey 25th/26th March Mark Mitchell Marshals Forum 70 29 Mar 2006 00:04
Croft 25th & 26th September Steve Gibson Marshals Forum 11 5 Oct 2004 04:55
750 Cadwell 25th/26th Pete Howarth Marshals Forum 68 29 Sep 2004 17:25
Donington FIA 25th/26th/27th June Don Truman Marshals Forum 25 13 Jul 2004 07:52
Rockingham 25th/26th May Stacy Trackside 4 30 May 2002 12:47


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:15.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.