Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 Sep 2002, 05:59 (Ref:381243)   #1
Seton_5
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
Melbourne
Posts: 164
Seton_5 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Wills And Cat Car In The Sand

I've just picked up that When the Brede and Owen Went in the sand gave Wills and Beseard the Victory. Seeing that He drove for the team and after everything with him being sacked.

Also Murphy and Richards. So much for them being great Mates. Richards spinning each other.

na there great mates!
Seton_5 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 07:25 (Ref:381279)   #2
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
An interesting comment from someone high up in the touring car ranks went along the lines of "we'd better send CAT a cheque for that..."

I've never seen so many people go through all of the sand traps as many times as during the weekend without seeing anyone go A over T...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 11:15 (Ref:381442)   #3
spook
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 542
spook should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
You can drive throgh the GRAVEL traps if you have power and steering control - they are designed for that - you only go "A over T" if you enter the GRAVEL traps out of control/sideways. What I found great was that so many of them were able to re-join the fray simply by the 3m of grass between the traps and the tyre walls/concrete walls. Imagine how many Safety Car periods there would have been without that "self-recovery" zone. Having just watched the telecast, the drivers and commentators seemed to have changed their tune on the track design - now it's technically challenging and a real car breaker - this time last year it was a "paper clip".
spook is offline  
__________________
If it is to be,
it is up to US.
The spook's ten most important two letter words.
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 12:10 (Ref:381479)   #4
William Dale Jr
Veteran
 
William Dale Jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Australia
Townsville, North Queensland
Posts: 1,225
William Dale Jr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yeah, it's amazing what a few bumps in the track surface can do to the character of a circuit. Or maybe it's just the fact that Matthew White is in the booth...
William Dale Jr is offline  
__________________
"Our traction control was kinda how much your last crash was still hurting you." - Kevin Schwantz
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 12:59 (Ref:381519)   #5
RaceTime
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,449
RaceTime should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The design of QLD Raceway isn't conducive to cars entering the gravel traps at an angle which will cause a roll.

If you compare, say, the trap at the end of the main straight at Sandown - which has seen numerous rolls - the design of that corner is go flat out-stop-turn hard left-go again; whereas QLD Raceways tracps are go flat out-brake slightly-turn rght-go again.

The difference in the two being that at Sandown you have a 90 degree hard turn - you go off line into the gravel the angle and momentm of the car is such that you *will* hit the gravel sideway. QLD Raceway almost guarantees you hit the gravel head on.
RaceTime is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 13:11 (Ref:381532)   #6
TMS
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 131
TMS should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Wills And Cat Car In The Sand

Quote:
Originally posted by Seton_5
I've just picked up that When the Brede and Owen Went in the sand gave Wills and Beseard the Victory. Seeing that He drove for the team and after everything with him being sacked.

Also Murphy and Richards. So much for them being great Mates. Richards spinning each other.

na there great mates!
I was right about 20 meters form that incident, and Murphy's car stopped breifly trying to pickup fuels which caused Richards to hit him......It wasnt intentional. It was definitly unfortunate for murphy though.

Last edited by TMS; 16 Sep 2002 at 13:13.
TMS is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 21:35 (Ref:381924)   #7
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
RT- Sure, design wise, cars shouldn't go A over T, but somehow, an awful lot of people have found out over the years, the hard way, that T1 especially can roll a car. In fact, from what I've read from some high ranking places, that there could possibly be a redesign of the sand trap in that part of the circuit.

There are two massive bumps out there, at turns one and two, and it's interesting how different drivers prepare for it. Some get their braking done well before them, then brace themselves, other go straight through there without braking until after them, because the jolt is so bad that you lose your footing on the brake pedal.
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 21:40 (Ref:381929)   #8
RaceTime
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,449
RaceTime should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Don't doubt that the bumps won't help and, of course, any sand trap on a turn could result in a roll over, but the basic design won't or shouldn't result in as many as at, say, Sandown.

Remove the bumps and you have a comparitively safer corner than Sandown.
RaceTime is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 22:02 (Ref:381958)   #9
spook
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 542
spook should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Don't forget that the purpose of a Gravel Trap is to reduce an accident to a survivable incident. Most rollovers are soft on the driver and usually the car - high speed impacts with tyre faced earth banks and concrete walls will kill drivers. The number of rollovers at Turn 1 QR is very small - there have been no monumentals that I can recall, and most rollovers have been repaired on the day or racing the next day. The traps at QR are also different because as you move around the corner the edge of the trap moves away from the track - something like 2m at the start and widens to 10m at exit I think - this allows more room for the driver to regain control and enter the trap safely and if he keeps up the momentum, drive through.

As far as the bumps are concerned - they have always been there - watch the videos from 1999 - the cars are just being pushed a lot more and finding the limits more often. Talk to a few drivers and they will tell you that every other circuit in Australia has bumps far bigger than the TWO at QR.
spook is offline  
__________________
If it is to be,
it is up to US.
The spook's ten most important two letter words.
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2002, 03:42 (Ref:382084)   #10
FalconEL
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 366
FalconEL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I've got agree spook, the QR gravel traps are pretty good, you can generally spear across them OK whilst decelerating so as not to hit anything hard. I've only visited the sand at relatively low speed myself though.

Cars such as Gemini series cars with higher centres of gravity have a problem when they hit the T1 sand trap sideways however.

The bumps at QR going into turn one have definately gotten a lot worse since 1999. I remember the place was nearly billiard table smooth when I first ran there in 1999, but this year you get blurred vision and your foot actually bounces off the brake pedal when you jump on the anchors for turn one. I think there is about three really noticable bumps into T1, then right about mid corner, there is another bump which actually helps you get through the corner because it unsettles the rear of the car when you've gotten back on the power.

T2? I haven't noticed too many bumps there, there is a patch of bitumen where they must have done some resurfacing but T2 is pretty smooth for mine LMW??

The bumps in the braking area for T3 are also pretty vicious but generally only really affect the smaller cars who jump on the brakes at about 130-140m. The bigger cars that brake at about 180-200m are already settled into their braking zone before the bumps.

As for the rest of QR, its still pretty smooth and standing up well to a fair bit of abuse from a lot of racing traffic over many years.

CD.
FalconEL is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2002, 04:12 (Ref:382089)   #11
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
You know very well that I can't count....

BTW- if you're reading this, my new laptop is working
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2002, 04:18 (Ref:382091)   #12
RaceTime
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,449
RaceTime should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sorry Crash - can't read it - came out all gobblydegook...
RaceTime is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2002, 05:19 (Ref:382103)   #13
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
...stupid lump of junk...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 18 Sep 2002, 01:24 (Ref:382998)   #14
silvervsix
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location:
QLD Australia
Posts: 186
silvervsix should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Question why are the bumps becoming bigger? Is the track sinking or settling.
silvervsix is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Sep 2002, 01:31 (Ref:383002)   #15
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The bumps have been getting worse since the track was built. Remember that when the track was first being laid, it was washed away by floods... probably a combination of the soil moving and the fact that they are the areas on the track when the cars are hard on the brakes etc
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 18 Sep 2002, 01:37 (Ref:383006)   #16
silvervsix
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location:
QLD Australia
Posts: 186
silvervsix should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thanks but there is no firm reason for this happening. Just speculation? Have QLD raceway decide to do anything about them?
silvervsix is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2002, 10:09 (Ref:383987)   #17
spook
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 542
spook should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The bumps are caused by the braking forces exerted by the cars on the very weak material that supports the racetrack pavement. The pavement I have been reliably informed is nearly one metre deep (imported gravel from quarry & mines) with 40mm of Asphalt on the top. The movement is in the gunk below - the site was a swamp before construction. The bumps have been measured each year by the QR managers and they are monitoring the situation, but there are no easy or cheap way to overcome the problem.

To be fair, there are a great number of larger bumps at other racetracks in Australia that are of greater concern to drivers than those at QR.

BTW Crashy, the flood during construction is not connected in any way to the bumps - I have seen photos of the flood and the bump areas are actually not under water. The creek that flowed through the site during construction is now permanently diverted around the raceway.

I agree that this years 500 was the best racing/passing event we have witnessed all year. The drivers seem to have realised that with 12m of track to use there is the possibility of more than one line through every corner and there is ground to be won/or lost by using that extra track width. There was a large number of drivers and team managers walking the track on the Thursday, and they were spending as much time looking at the runoff from each corner as the corners themselves. Apart from LP who thinks the place is dull & flat, most drivers left with straight cars and only damaged pride. Humm - if Larry thinks the place is that simple, why can't he get anywhere near the lap record.
spook is offline  
__________________
If it is to be,
it is up to US.
The spook's ten most important two letter words.
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2002, 21:33 (Ref:384419)   #18
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Thanks Spook.

I suppose Larry has to have a grumble about something...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sand traps Kirk Formula One 27 7 Apr 2005 05:29
The two Wills - where to from here? Nicholosophy Formula One 30 1 Dec 2004 11:33
Sand in Engines this weekend sawbench Formula One 5 1 Apr 2004 23:50
Sand traps at Sears Point. 24thunder NASCAR & Stock Car Racing 69 5 Jul 2002 03:56


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.