|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
7 Aug 2012, 12:18 (Ref:3117082) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
Group 2/Group 1/Group A Anom(a)lous Cars
Can anyone explain to me how the 2nd Gen big block all aluminum engined Camaro raced by Frank Gardener was ever remotely legal? They never even made such a car at least not properly, they stuffed a few engines in the chassis (about 50 odd) in a none GM garage workshop only sold about 20 odd of these and broke the others for the engines to race in CanAm cars so how were they ever homologated for circuit racing as i believe the original homologation was for the drag strip, I'm confused??
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
7 Aug 2012, 15:39 (Ref:3117175) | #2 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,393
|
Quote:
In all, Chevy produced 69 Camaros fitted with the alloy big-block motor, which weighed about the same as the stock all-iron 327. The motor was also made available as a production option for the Corvette; two were made. I believe that for Group 2 homologation at the time, it was only necessary to produce a certain number of parts kits; they did not have to be fitted to cars off the production line. However, I thought the minimum quantity was 100. Also, the motor was never sold in a second-generation car, so just how Frank's car got its homologation I do not know. If the homologation was dubious, how come Ford to name but one competitor did not ask the question of the FIA at the time- although I'm not sure how dry-sumped, mechanically fuel-injected 1litre and 1300 BDA Escorts got in , either. Later, of course, we had the farce of Group 1 Avengers with twin 40DCOE Webers, and the Mazda RX7's acceptance as the saloon car it so clearly wasn't.... |
|||
__________________
Columnated ruins domino |
8 Aug 2012, 08:50 (Ref:3117474) | #3 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,639
|
Posts moved from BTCC Supertouring thread.
|
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
8 Aug 2012, 15:08 (Ref:3117615) | #4 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
|
||
|
8 Aug 2012, 15:43 (Ref:3117629) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,445
|
I assume you mean "anomalous" Al (and that's after most of the day in the beach bar) !
Anyway it used to happen in those days and was probably to do with "who knew who" |
||
__________________
Balls of steel (knob of butter) They're Asking For Larkins. ( Proper beer) not you're Eurofizz crap. Hace más calor en España. Me han conocido a hablar un montón cojones! Send any cheques and cash to PO box 1 Lagos Nigeria Africa ! |
8 Aug 2012, 16:26 (Ref:3117652) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,393
|
Aaah.... but what if the second generation Camaro was itself homologated as a production evolution/variation of the first generation car, rather than as a completely new vehicle?
Surely someone out there has copies of the FIA homologation papers for a second generation car? At least the ZL1 motor never made it into Group 1! Incidentally, if anyone should happen to have the odd spare ZL1 motor or so gathering dust in a lock-up or under a bench, I know a gentleman from Watford who will take it off your hands for the right price.... |
||
__________________
Columnated ruins domino |
8 Aug 2012, 18:33 (Ref:3117690) | #7 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 312
|
While it was not unusual to have homologations moved from first to second generation (like the Escort II) the ZL1 Camaro was in fact a homologation variant (9th addendum) of the Mk2 Camaro. (#5310). It was for group 2 only.
|
||
__________________
Frank de Jong |
8 Aug 2012, 18:42 (Ref:3117692) | #8 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,830
|
Quote:
Clive, you have far more period knowledge than I do, but as far as I can remember the 1973 Gp2 BTCC regs allowed alternative cylinder heads, so Ford simply fitted a BD head to the 1300GT? |
|||
__________________
Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere. (Einstein) |
8 Aug 2012, 18:52 (Ref:3117697) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
|||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
8 Aug 2012, 19:30 (Ref:3117702) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,393
|
Mike
As far as I know, the 1973 Group 2 regulations for the RAC British Saloon Car Championship most certainly did not allow alternative heads; you were permitted to remove metal from the homologated head, but not add it. Perhaps you are thinking of the Group 5 regulations under which the Championship was run up to the end of the 1969 season? This allowed 8 port heads on Minis, and downdraught heads on 1300 MAEs in Broadspeed's 1300GT Escorts. I also think that whilst the bore on a Gp.2 homologated motor was free, the stroke was not; that was why Ford homologated the RS3100, to allow the longer stroke that gave them 3.4L in the Essex-based Cosworth GA. As a guess, I'd say that the 1300 and 1litre BDAs were homologated as a production variation of the RS1600, which was a genuine production entity, albeit in what sort of numbers I'm not sure. |
||
__________________
Columnated ruins domino |
8 Aug 2012, 19:54 (Ref:3117710) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
I thought the RS3100 was a merely a 60thou overbored Essex.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
8 Aug 2012, 20:08 (Ref:3117714) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,393
|
You may be right Al, but I thought that the whole point of the RS3100 was to allow the longer stroke, which coupled with an overbore, gave the 3.4 litres.
I can still remember Frank's Camaro leading all the factory Capris and BMWs at the Silverstone TT in 1973. There ain't no substitute for cubic inches.... |
||
__________________
Columnated ruins domino |
8 Aug 2012, 20:32 (Ref:3117722) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
Have you seen Frank's video where he is first instructing people how to drive the beast around Oulton then goes to a BTCC race at Thruxton? The speed differential between the Camaro and the Capris and Batmobiles is quite stunning.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
8 Aug 2012, 20:44 (Ref:3117725) | #14 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 383
|
I believe that Group 2 DID allow alternative cylinder heads. The RS3100 (Group 2) Capri obviously had the Cosworth 4 valve heads, and the earlier RS2600 Capri (Gp. 2) had Weslake designed heads.
My understanding of the RS3100 engine size is this. The RS3100 road car (the "homologation special") was merely a 3000GT with a 0.060" overbored engine, and a very mild porting job (I know one of the people who was involved in building these "special" engines back in the day, and they were certainly not that special!) The original Capri 3000GT engine was 2994cc, which meant they ran in the up to 3L class. The RS3100's 3.1L capacity allowed them to run in the next class, up to 3500cc, so they could stretch the engine and be competitive with the 3.0CSL, which was 3500cc and now sporting a 4 valve head too. The engine bore went up from 95.2mm of the RS3100 to 100mm on the GAA engine, giving a capacity of a tad over 3400cc. Of course no road going Capri was ever produced with such an engine, but there were 100 Cosworth engine kits produced (or 200 depending who you talk to?) so obviously not necessary for them to be fitted to the road car from the factory, as was necessary in the likes of Gp.A. But engine capacity in the original car did matter in Gp.2, hence building the overbored RS3100 road car. My guess is the 1300BDA Escort was running as a 1300GT, as someone suggested earlier. How all of this would extrapolate into the OP question re the rank Gardner Camaro I am not sure, was there a big block Gen II Camaro produced ex factory? |
|
|
8 Aug 2012, 21:09 (Ref:3117733) | #15 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 312
|
The last post is correct; alternative heads had to be produced 100 times to be homologated. For the BMW 2002 there were 2 totally different 4-valve heads.
The 1300 BDA was a 1300 engine with again a 4-valve head; it was homologated in 1000 cc form (very early IIRC) and even 1150 form. Ford did its homework. |
||
__________________
Frank de Jong |
9 Aug 2012, 06:24 (Ref:3117817) | #16 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,639
|
IMO the 3100 RS Capri was developed for two reasons, the first being the engine size and in reality it didn't need to be a very hot engine, they just needed the bore and stroke. The other reason was the ducktail. The RS 2600 (in reality a 2900) was found to be unstable at speed so they needed that ducktail to compete with the BMW.
But in fact there is nothing "anomalous" about these cars. The XJS and the RX7 are arguably the most strange cars to be granted Group 2 homologation, (the XJS went on to Group A). What others were there? |
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
9 Aug 2012, 07:00 (Ref:3117826) | #17 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 445
|
Alternative heads
They were certainly allowed 4 valve heads in Gp 2 in 1973. I think it was just that the most known examples, Capri , BMW did not have them ready for use until 1974.
As I remember the bore size was free, only the crank stroke had to be homologated with a production car, or evoloution of. Hence the RS 3100 and the CSL Batmobile. Alex |
|
|
9 Aug 2012, 09:20 (Ref:3117867) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
Yes the 2nd gen Camaro was produced and quite a few as well with a 396ci big block engine in fact I believe it was a 402 but released as 396 for insurance purposes and also understated bhp. But it was an all iron engine and although powerful was a real heavyweight.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
10 Aug 2012, 12:03 (Ref:3118327) | #19 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 242
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Aug 2012, 17:23 (Ref:3118420) | #20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 445
|
Quote:
It is interesting that BMW, amd maybe Ford, had already built and Homologated the 24 valve engine in `73. But decided not to use it. When they did it was not much of an improvement over the 12 valve for some time. Still it was the best period of Touring Cars in my opinion. Alex |
||
|
10 Aug 2012, 20:05 (Ref:3118465) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,393
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Columnated ruins domino |
11 Aug 2012, 16:43 (Ref:3118711) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
Really Clive, erm 454 thats some serious muscle.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
11 Aug 2012, 17:37 (Ref:3118725) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,393
|
The downside was that it was also seriously heavy. IIRC, this led some competitors to use the big block at the power circuits like Silverstone and Thruxton, and the 350 at circuits such as Brands, where handling was at more of a premium.
|
||
__________________
Columnated ruins domino |
11 Aug 2012, 18:18 (Ref:3118737) | #24 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,639
|
And I recall they were seriously good value going through Allard at Thruxton. But surely these were homologated cars with nothing particularly "suspect" about that homologation. I know I stopped the thread at Group 2 but I was hoping for stories similar to the lack of sufficient cars in one location, such as the alleged Gothenberg taxi story.
|
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
11 Aug 2012, 21:45 (Ref:3118797) | #25 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,941
|
Ah yes...
Was this the story where 500 240 Turbo's were supposed to be supplied for homologation counting but there was only 150 present, and even those may just have been rolling shells? |
||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Group B & Group S rally cars research | TrevorC | Motorsport History | 18 | 3 May 2018 05:25 |
Group 1/Group A Vauxhall Astra/Opel Kadett- BTCC and DTM | KA | Motorsport History | 46 | 12 Oct 2015 20:58 |
Group C and Group A Touring car Forum | groupnxu1 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 1 | 22 Nov 2005 05:12 |
What is you favourite Group 4 (pre Group B) 1970's Rallycar and why? | Robin Plummer | Rallying & Rallycross | 13 | 17 Feb 2003 21:37 |