Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 Apr 2005, 21:18 (Ref:1277553)   #1
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
ACO Spec Vs. FIA GT Spec

I tried to get an answer on this in the ALMS forum, but no luck. I'll try here.

If I understand correctly FIA GT is running to ACO spec this year. In fact, it was easy to see the 550's and 575's were running the narrower wings at Monza. But I'm not sure I understand the following two pictures:

Lambo ALMS 2004

http://www.americanlemans.com/galler...fying/7_lg.jpg

Lambo FIA GT 2005

http://www.project-lemans.de/index.p...7&key=16&hit=1


Is it me, or does the Lambo appear to have a narrower wing in the 2004 pic versus the 2005 pic? Both races were run under ACO specs. Were they allowed a larger wing this year in FIA GT? I recall one of the grumblings about the K-B Lambo was that it lost downforce due to the narrow wing. Any comments?

Last edited by jhansen; 13 Apr 2005 at 21:20.
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 13 Apr 2005, 21:30 (Ref:1277560)   #2
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Here is a better pic of the Lambo from the Monza test day:

http://www.project-lemans.de/index.p...5&key=14&hit=1
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 13 Apr 2005, 23:05 (Ref:1277649)   #3
Jeffrey-Lee
Racer
 
Jeffrey-Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 201
Jeffrey-Lee should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Maybe the ACO rules changed for 2005? I believe the width of the rearwing on the FIA gt cars depends on the with of the windscreen base, hence the lambo has a wider wing than the Saleen.
Jeffrey-Lee is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 00:20 (Ref:1277669)   #4
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
But that was the rule last year as well if I recall. The Pagani had a very narrow wing for the same reason.
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 01:17 (Ref:1277685)   #5
tblincoe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,761
tblincoe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
for some reason the Lambo is allowed to run a bigger wing... i dunno.
tblincoe is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 12:15 (Ref:1277966)   #6
Asa
Veteran
 
Asa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Hong Kong
Disneyland
Posts: 1,216
Asa should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

Autosport magazine reported that the Lambo is allowed to run a bigger air restrictor this year, but no info about its wing size.
Asa is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 12:25 (Ref:1277981)   #7
Tom V
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Belgium
Belgium
Posts: 146
Tom V should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhansen
Is it me, or does the Lambo appear to have a narrower wing in the 2004 pic versus the 2005 pic? Both races were run under ACO specs. Were they allowed a larger wing this year in FIA GT? I recall one of the grumblings about the K-B Lambo was that it lost downforce due to the narrow wing. Any comments?
When the Lambo made it's debut in FIA GT last year it already had the same big wing as the one they used in Monza last week. Nothing has changed there.

It's only for the ALMS races the wing had to be shortened. I remember reading an article at the time which explained why the wing had to be shortened but I forgot the exact reason.

Last edited by Saleen; 14 Apr 2005 at 12:27.
Tom V is offline  
__________________
Porsche 917: greatest racing car ever
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 15:11 (Ref:1278107)   #8
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The Lambo did not have to run to ACO specs in the FIA GT last season. That's why it had a bigger wing. However, the K-B Lambo had to run the ACO spec wing in the ALMS and complained of low downforce. Fast forward to 2005. FIA GT is now running ACO specs. Look at the Ferrari 550's wings this year compared to last year. But the Lambo didn't change. I'm just wondering why.

Just to show the difference, Ferrari 550M in 2004:

http://www.project-lemans.de/index.p...45&key=6&hit=1

Ferrari 550M in 2005:

http://www.project-lemans.de/index.p...7&key=18&hit=1


Thanks project-lemans.de for the great pics.

Last edited by jhansen; 14 Apr 2005 at 15:18.
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 16:39 (Ref:1278163)   #9
tblincoe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,761
tblincoe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
after looking more at the different pics i can also see that the ACEMCO Saleens at Sebring had wider wings than the Konrad Saleens at Monza... i just dont get it!
tblincoe is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 17:18 (Ref:1278186)   #10
Jeffrey-Lee
Racer
 
Jeffrey-Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 201
Jeffrey-Lee should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
The Lambo did not have to run to ACO specs in the FIA GT last season.
No one had to run to ACO regs last season in FIA GT....

Everyone had the wide wings. Except the Maser, but that was an extra sanction.
Jeffrey-Lee is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 17:30 (Ref:1278196)   #11
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Yet nobody knows why it is still running the wide wing this year...

jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 18:07 (Ref:1278230)   #12
paul-collins
Veteran
 
paul-collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Canada
Mosport on a good day
Posts: 5,147
paul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Maybe just no one's bothered to complain?
paul-collins is offline  
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?

-Bill James
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 19:00 (Ref:1278274)   #13
SALEEN S7R
Veteran
 
SALEEN S7R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
England
Poole, England
Posts: 7,366
SALEEN S7R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSALEEN S7R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSALEEN S7R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Dont forget guys, the ALMS is still running to the ACO regulations as of 2003 if I remember correctly, this would explain why the rear wings differ in size to those of the cars in FIA GT and the LMES.
SALEEN S7R is offline  
__________________
Sportscar Racing fans of the world Unite!
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 19:18 (Ref:1278285)   #14
tblincoe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,761
tblincoe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by SALEEN S7R
Dont forget guys, the ALMS is still running to the ACO regulations as of 2003 if I remember correctly, this would explain why the rear wings differ in size to those of the cars in FIA GT and the LMES.
i'm pretty sure that was just for LMPs and even so, i think that the wing size of the GT1/GTS cars haven't fluctuated over that time period
tblincoe is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Apr 2005, 19:31 (Ref:1278297)   #15
lj79
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Qatar
Posts: 517
lj79 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
alms have the smaller wings too
lj79 is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spec your own VW and take it for Joyride Alan Raine Cool Sites 5 1 Apr 2006 18:37
ETCC Spec gain 25kgs/Weight increase for ETCC-spec cars [merged] touringcarnut Touring Car Racing 7 28 Apr 2004 13:35
BTCC Spec/ETCC Spec Cars at Media Day Cosworth_RS Touring Car Racing 2 17 Mar 2004 22:06
Seat spec coxmattycox Touring Car Racing 1 18 Nov 2003 18:04
whats your PC spec ? woodyracing Virtual Racers 10 15 May 2001 19:15


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.