Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 Mar 2002, 17:08 (Ref:245987)   #1
Splatz the Cow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,217
Splatz the Cow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSplatz the Cow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
BMW Power not so new...

In 1997, BMW powered the McLaren F1 GTR longtails at LeMans. The six litre engine was massively powerful and must have been great practice for BMW in developing big HP engines. A senior BMW motorsport technician said the engine produced significantly more power without the mandatory restrictors, and at a much higher rpm. In fact he put the power at just under 850bhp at something much higher than the F1 GTR's rev limit.

Its also become known that the M3 GTR's four litre donk is cranking out around 650hp in the GTS category, before its restrictor plates go on. Still pumping out 470Nm once the horsepower has been brought down to 450! I bet Panoz must have wondered what they were doing wrong with their own 4.0L mill.

What does this mean for F1. BMW are a company consistantly making units with big end power that last races and win.

So this leads me to think that now that BMW have a significant power advantage, they are going for reliability, a BMW standard. So is this year's F1 engine detuned for better lasting? I suspect so.
Splatz the Cow is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Mar 2002, 17:18 (Ref:245993)   #2
neilap
Veteran
 
neilap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Jamaica
21212
Posts: 2,986
neilap should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I feel that they might have sorted the motor out a bit better. It might feel more driveable. However what I felt was unrealistic in the press were the claims of 900hp by the media. I just dont understand why people seem to forget about the chassis. It has to be exceptional to handle at the "BMW powah", right! As far a detuning. I doubt it. In a sence all the teams detune their motors. But it is a balance between power and reliability that they all seek. So it is as powerful as they think they can run reliably.
neilap is offline  
__________________
Eventually we learn
Quote
Old 28 Mar 2002, 18:30 (Ref:246041)   #3
BD
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location:
Chicago, IL
Posts: 289
BD should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I love these topics
BMW have always been expert engine builders. It didnt just start with the McLaren motor.
Back in the early 80's, during the turbo era, BMW had 1.5L 4 cylinders that cranked out 1300-1500hp in qualifying trim. Using stock blocks!!! Amazing. At first they didnt know how much power they were putting out because their dynometer only went up to 1000hp.
As far as detuning the motors. The easiest way to limit power is to limit revs, hence rev limiters. Which in turn puts less stress on the motor.
Another way to limit power is to build the internal engine parts more robust. Which makes them heavier, which limits engine revs. Its finding this balance that makes a powerful and reliable motor.
But that is just a simplistic way of putting it. BMW must know something that the other companies havent figured out yet. There is just too big of a gap between BMW and the other engines. 20hp is a pretty big gap.
BD is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2002, 00:06 (Ref:246318)   #4
kmchow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location:
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 3,919
kmchow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It's too bad Honda can't get their engines into one some more reliable cars. Perhaps we can then see who--BMW or Honda--is the master of engines!
kmchow is offline  
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever...
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2002, 02:41 (Ref:246387)   #5
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

Quote:
Originally posted by kmchow
It's too bad Honda can't get their engines into one some more reliable cars.
You're kidding right?!Hondas recent history has been a littany of broken cranks & other stuff that has continually forced them to reduce revs to survive the race.From recent comments,they even seam not to be running full revs in qualifying!!
RWC is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2002, 03:41 (Ref:246400)   #6
neilap
Veteran
 
neilap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Jamaica
21212
Posts: 2,986
neilap should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I am biased as hell and still am forced to admit Honda is having issues with their motor. A shame though because it is really making their success as an outstanding builer look a bit overstated.
neilap is offline  
__________________
Eventually we learn
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2002, 04:07 (Ref:246408)   #7
kmchow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location:
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 3,919
kmchow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
However, there is a price to pay for BMW's involvement in F1. They have significantly cut back their touring car programmes!!
kmchow is offline  
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever...
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2002, 04:46 (Ref:246425)   #8
Valve Bounce
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Home :)
Posts: 7,491
Valve Bounce has been held in scrutiny for further testing
Quote:
Originally posted by kmchow
Perhaps we can then see who--BMW or Honda--is the master of engines!
You are kidding, arn't you!! I wouldn't try to compare Honda with anything much higher in ranking than the Ford unit, certainly not Renault, and the top three are way beyond Honda's horizon.
Valve Bounce is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2002, 08:38 (Ref:246483)   #9
DavyboyLT1
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 172
DavyboyLT1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by BD
Back in the early 80's, during the turbo era, BMW had 1.5L 4 cylinders that cranked out 1300-1500hp in qualifying trim. Using stock blocks!!!

I remember them - they called them the "Megatron" engines. For qualifying, they ran 65-70 psi of boost from the single turbo. I recall the drivers describing the power, when boost came on, as being like flicking on a light switch, and suddenly having 1000+ BHP at the rear wheels.
DavyboyLT1 is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2002, 17:49 (Ref:246693)   #10
neilap
Veteran
 
neilap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Jamaica
21212
Posts: 2,986
neilap should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well back then Honda was putting out similar power figures from their 1.5 liter unit. 1000hp per liter. BMW just really did their homework this time around. Honda seems to still be searching. BMW hit the nail on the head the first time. I would not be so quick to judge though. It is not like Honda is resigned to be and also ran. Lets see.
neilap is offline  
__________________
Eventually we learn
Quote
Old 30 Mar 2002, 14:30 (Ref:247356)   #11
wheelie
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location:
germany
Posts: 31
wheelie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by DavyboyLT1



...I recall the drivers describing the power, when boost came on, as being like flicking on a light switch, and suddenly having 1000+ BHP at the rear wheels.
How can a driver handle this sudden powerthrust?
Was that a reason for banning turbos?

Last edited by wheelie; 30 Mar 2002 at 14:31.
wheelie is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 00:00 (Ref:248525)   #12
DavyboyLT1
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 172
DavyboyLT1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Turbos were banned because the horsepower race was getting ridiculous, and they wanted to slow the cars down.

But, yes, the turbo cars (especially the 4 cyl. Megatron powered ones) were quite a handful to drive.
DavyboyLT1 is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 04:29 (Ref:248636)   #13
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I still can't believe how easily BMW have come to grips with modern day Formula One. They have been competitive, really, since day 1. Quite unbelievable in this day and age.

As mentioned before, the Turbo BMW, particularly in the Brabhams and Benettons, were seriously powerful, but were also prone to blowing up (just like in the Williams last year.) But they were the days - 1300BHP, tyres capable of one serious banzai qualifying lap and then the technical side during the race of trying to go as fast a driver can while conserving fuel.

Honda, meanwhile, have some serious work to do if they want to rediscover the glory days of 1986-1991. They lack reliability, horsepower and are not with a team capable of taking Grand Prix victories on a consistent basis.
f1manoz is offline  
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die!
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 04:37 (Ref:248640)   #14
Valve Bounce
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Home :)
Posts: 7,491
Valve Bounce has been held in scrutiny for further testing
Quote:
Originally posted by f1manoz


Honda, meanwhile, have some serious work to do if they want to rediscover the glory days of 1986-1991. They lack reliability, horsepower and are not with a team capable of taking Grand Prix victories on a consistent basis.
Maybe they should go and ask Toyota how it's done.

Still, it's not safe to gloat in sport. I remember in a previous Wintr Olympics, the Swiss were doing so badly that the Austrians were laughing at them, and sking "Can we help you?". Now at this Wintr Olympics, people were mistaking the Australians for Austrians because our guys were doing much better in the early stages.
Valve Bounce is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 07:11 (Ref:248684)   #15
Blue
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 175
Blue should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
honda sucks big time now, but in the senna vs prost era, honda was unbeatable, i saw the races on video, and the commentators were raving about the engine like they do now for bmw. honda must have been a 'master of engine' back then.
Blue is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 09:21 (Ref:248746)   #16
Splatz the Cow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,217
Splatz the Cow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSplatz the Cow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yes, the same person who designed those hi-po BMW motors punching 1000 horses, designed the Big-Mac motor.

Strange to think of McLaren F1 powered by Mercedes, and McLaen F1 powered by BMW (the F1 GTR.)
Splatz the Cow is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 09:24 (Ref:248750)   #17
Splatz the Cow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,217
Splatz the Cow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSplatz the Cow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
And as for not producing touring cars, didn't I just mention in the first post about the M3 GTR. Shame BMW were so retarded in their thinking that they forgot that motorsport has rules that include them as well, requiring them to build a road car for full sale. Seen a 4.0L V8 M3 lately?
Splatz the Cow is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 09:39 (Ref:248761)   #18
calais
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
australia
Posts: 934
calais should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
its a bit early to write off honda. just look at their road car engines. top shelf stuff.
look at renault this time last year, their engine was a dog. today everyone is saying how good it is.
honda will get there
calais is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 10:23 (Ref:248797)   #19
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Yes, Honda may get there, but the Renault is barely one year old yet Honda have been back officially since 2000 (and never really left due to the Mugen deal Ligier/Prost/Jordan carried).

Honda are going to have to work very hard, and perhaps start their own team, to achieve the results of yesteryear.
f1manoz is offline  
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die!
Quote
Old 1 Apr 2002, 13:55 (Ref:248966)   #20
DMC
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Posts: 322
DMC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by f1manoz
Yes, Honda may get there, but the Renault is barely one year old yet Honda have been back officially since 2000 (and never really left due to the Mugen deal Ligier/Prost/Jordan carried).

Honda are going to have to work very hard, and perhaps start their own team, to achieve the results of yesteryear.
Or buy BAR when British American Tobacco want out when tobacco sponsorship bans come into place. This is the most likely scenario for Honda as I can't see Eddie Jordan's ego letting someone else take charge of HIS team.
DMC is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sbr Power For Boc In 06 brendan24688 Australasian Touring Cars. 6 6 Oct 2005 20:25
does a.c take away power? old skool Racing Technology 5 2 Nov 2003 12:18
Will Power power DavidStHubbins National & International Single Seaters 8 11 Dec 2002 06:31
BMW POWER!!! Mr.S Formula One 9 26 Apr 2000 10:52


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.