|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Apr 2017, 17:58 (Ref:3726701) | #5301 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,934
|
I don't think the straights are long enough for the low down force kit to be an advantage. You'd come out of the high down force corners much slower and start at a lower speed.
|
|
|
15 Apr 2017, 18:17 (Ref:3726708) | #5302 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
That wasn't the case in 2015 I was hoping for a tug of war matchup like that this year. But it seems the Toyota and Porsche are equal on top speed as well. At least through the speed traps. That's why I asked if anyone saw any onboards to know the real top speed difference.
|
|
|
15 Apr 2017, 18:25 (Ref:3726709) | #5303 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
So the FIA killed Group C, they did not want anything as competition. Same people still around, and F1 in the doldrums, wait too see it happen again. |
||
|
15 Apr 2017, 20:10 (Ref:3726725) | #5304 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
Anyway you're right, toyota HD and porsche LD have the same recorded top speed. This let me think: A: toyota has a higher combined power than porsche B: toyota has a so amazing acceleration, that let the car hit top speed sooner than expected C: using a LD package, porsche struggle to have a decent exit speed before the hangar straight kolles clm marked about 290km/h as best top speed, and suspecting that clm has a "low downforce - high drag" package, the nismo engine should push an insane power to let the car hit that speed BTW, any news about 2017 gear boxes? do toyota stick with 6s and porsche with 7s? interesting should be the kolles clm gearbox, if memory helps, nismo gt-r lmp1 had a 5 speed gearbox |
||
|
15 Apr 2017, 20:32 (Ref:3726730) | #5305 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Apr 2017, 21:10 (Ref:3726735) | #5306 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,575
|
Watching trackside the Toyota's have incredible acceleration out of the corners, they seem faster than the Porsches
|
||
|
16 Apr 2017, 01:14 (Ref:3726758) | #5307 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,668
|
|||
|
16 Apr 2017, 01:16 (Ref:3726759) | #5308 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,668
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
16 Apr 2017, 08:13 (Ref:3726822) | #5309 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 102
|
Kobayashi said here that #7 had the qualifying special setting. They can run through some corners without any lifting while #8 couldnt. Their corner speed is very high but they harvest less energy than #8 so their top speed is below #8. He admitted that #7 will probably be slower than #8 in race.
|
|
|
16 Apr 2017, 12:11 (Ref:3726902) | #5310 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
|
||
|
16 Apr 2017, 15:10 (Ref:3727032) | #5311 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Hope the issues Toyota are having are just phantoms and aren't lasting problems. They need flawless runs to win.
|
|
|
17 Apr 2017, 03:31 (Ref:3727248) | #5312 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
I'm probably going to nickname the current TS050 Tyto. Need a reference, just look at my avatar and the new TS050 has beady headlights and the nose looks more like a beak than last year's car because of the catwalk shrouds.
|
||
|
17 Apr 2017, 10:06 (Ref:3727298) | #5313 | |
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 128
|
Just out of interest, does anyone thinks toyota is not as good as passing slower GT cars compared with Porsche?
|
|
|
17 Apr 2017, 10:16 (Ref:3727302) | #5314 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6,134
|
There might have been a difference in energy deployment between the cars, which could also explain why Toyota could match Porsche for top speed on a high downforce setup, but I suspect it had more to do with the Toyotas encountering traffic first.
|
||
__________________
BoP is democracy for racing. |
17 Apr 2017, 18:46 (Ref:3727372) | #5315 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,052
|
While it could at least partly the car, I just have the impression that the Toyota drivers (Buemi excepted) just aren't quite as ruthless as the Porsche or Audi drivers are/were.
|
||
|
17 Apr 2017, 20:15 (Ref:3727400) | #5316 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,497
|
I think Toyota should be mighty worried post-Le Mans.
|
|
|
17 Apr 2017, 20:29 (Ref:3727403) | #5317 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
With one car out, I thought they may have been a bit cautious towards the end, but Buemi knew he had the win in hand with the fresher tires. Was cool to see him go for it like that. With only 4 sets and 2 spares, tire wear is going to be the biggest factory imo.
Development doesn't stop just because a package is homologated. Engine performance can improve and so can setup. I don't think one race is enough to draw any conclusions there. But the pit stops have to get faster! |
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 06:44 (Ref:3727478) | #5318 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 612
|
There is interview with Buemi in the android app, he said that in last minutes he was really pushing, what is interesting is that he said he was using more charge than he was regenerating, or did I get that wrong?
This indicates that they still have problems with regenerating full MJ allocation for tracks other than LeMans, probably because they don't have MGU-H. It also answers why qualifying laps are so much better than race pace. This also begs the question what is the capacity of the battery, it seems like they have quite a big capacity to play around like that. It's a little surprising since all batteries follow Ragone plot - either you have high power or high capacity, you can't have both. These plots suggest that with very high power li-ion you will only get around 2 kWh or less @360kW power. These cars inputs/outputs that capacity every 3 minutes or so, there is very little spare capacity to play with, but maybe enough to push out more charge than it's getting in for something like 15 minutes? Of course Porsche can do similar, but I doubt they gain as much as Toytoa by doing so. Edit: Toyota also showed several times that they can limp to pit stop on battery power alone, #7 didn't exactly "roll with low resistance" and they managed to drive couple of km on battery alone. Last edited by GasperG; 18 Apr 2017 at 07:03. |
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 07:17 (Ref:3727482) | #5319 | |
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 128
|
Quote:
Oh and dont forget, Toyota is capable of running a lap with just EV mode(like they did last year). That indicates they have alot of capacity. Hence, for only 1 stint, they dont have to recover much energy yet you can keep using the battery without emptying it out. PS: MGU-H is great way to go...but after all, it's sacrificing the engine efficiency in all rev range and during acceleration. |
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 09:22 (Ref:3727508) | #5320 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 612
|
I agree, but I still expect smaller margin in qualifying lap and race pace at LeMans, where they recuperate MJ allocation a lot easier. If you interpolate Silverstone diference then you would get 6s diference at LeMans, that is just crazy.
The capacity of the battery is surprising, at least for me. It's incredible when you consider weight and size are such an important factor. |
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 13:32 (Ref:3727557) | #5321 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 122
|
Porsche doesn't have a MGU-H, their turbo only works in generator mode.
Also Silverstone is not a track where you can get much braking regen. There's only 3 real heavy braking zones, plus the length of the circuit means they can only harvest ~3.5MJ per lap. |
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 14:26 (Ref:3727569) | #5322 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,664
|
|||
__________________
"Those were the days my friends. We thought they'd never end..." jimclark |
18 Apr 2017, 15:33 (Ref:3727583) | #5323 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
Toyota can improve tire changing time by cheating Porsche style.
Porsche: 15.85 sec https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C65Pe_lLiNI Toyota: 19.05 sec https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg2t-Q0l8kk |
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 16:32 (Ref:3727592) | #5324 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,308
|
Their High df kit is already homologated while Porsche can still tweak theirs before its initial use after LM. And Toyota will debut their Low df kit at Spa so there's little extra time to tweak and develop it. It's more of a WEC championship than finally winning LM concern. But 3 cars might mean one makes it 4 min longer than last year's car and we, including Porsche fans, don't have that heartbreak of last year. Even if you hate Toyota that's a tough failure to celebrate.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 16:36 (Ref:3727594) | #5325 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,308
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Audi LMP1 Discussion | gwyllion | ACO Regulated Series | 11685 | 16 Feb 2017 10:42 |
Nissan LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5568 | 17 Feb 2016 23:22 |
Strakka LMP1 discussion | Pontlieue | Sportscar & GT Racing | 56 | 12 Jul 2015 19:12 |
The never ending Toyota return to Le Mans (LMP1) Saga | The Badger | ACO Regulated Series | 6844 | 8 Jan 2014 02:19 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |