Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Other Motorsports > Hillclimb and Sprint

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 Aug 2008, 00:12 (Ref:2263520)   #51
rescue dude
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
England
Posts: 860
rescue dude is a back marker
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlr
Anyone tilting their engine to fit a 'Mi16' into a 205 deserves the instant bottom end oil surge failure that will happen!


Rescue dude: Correct but talking about modified production classes here where the head is free, if they made a 48v head you could fit it to a 205 they would be tiny valves though lol
The surge is caused by oil being "thrown " to one side of the head and not being able to go anywhere.

Yes you were talking about mod prod but i mentioned in my post that i meant road going.

sorry to interrupt do carry on.
rescue dude is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Aug 2008, 07:13 (Ref:2263562)   #52
dlr
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
dlr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Its partially that. The head in question does only have 1 drain hole and a large open trough for want of another word in the middle which holds the oil. The later GTi6/VTS heads had a second drain hole. The other main factor is it having piston located con rods whereas again the later later heads had crank located rods meaning the pressure is held longer instead of having effectively big drains either side of the big ends. Getting off topic now!

There are a lot of silly rules in sprints and presumably racing as well. Things like minor difference in blocks shouldn't really be an issue, ie an Escort running a 205 one and minor differences to suspension and all that either. Its things like entirely different engines like vauxhall escorts or cars running illegal capacities ie over 2 litre but staying in the 2 litre class that need to be slapped.
dlr is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Aug 2008, 07:47 (Ref:2263585)   #53
Copperbottom
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 775
Copperbottom has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlr
There are a lot of silly rules in sprints and presumably racing as well. Things like minor difference in blocks shouldn't really be an issue, ie an Escort running a 205 one and minor differences to suspension and all that either. Its things like entirely different engines like vauxhall escorts or cars running illegal capacities ie over 2 litre but staying in the 2 litre class that need to be slapped.
That's exactly the point I'm trying to make (in around about way). How can we get these rules changed???
Copperbottom is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Aug 2008, 09:16 (Ref:2263640)   #54
dlr
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
dlr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Not sure really. I guess it has to go to the MSA. They must have someone there who is responsible for these sorts of regulations so actually understands them with some competence unlike the licensing lot that take ages to send a small license card......whether they would listen to one invididual though is another thing. May need to get a official motor club to make the contact so more chance of them being listened to or in the case of Escorts, an owners club of some description.

Perhaps a simple way of doing it would be with age like how they do historic classes which are now up to 1981 or something ie ive seen a mk1 Golf in a historic rally now. If you used the same logic with blocks then you could say any Ford block is allowed for use in a mk1/2 Escort as long as it retains the original number of clyinders and is more than 20 years old or something. Unsure on exact dates but lets presume this means you could then run the '205' block but not a Zetec.
dlr is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Aug 2008, 10:24 (Ref:2263678)   #55
Steve Wilkinson
Veteran
 
Steve Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
United Kingdom
Southport
Posts: 2,493
Steve Wilkinson is a back marker
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlr
Not sure really. I guess it has to go to the MSA. They must have someone there who is responsible for these sorts of regulations so actually understands them with some competence unlike the licensing lot that take ages to send a small license card......whether they would listen to one invididual though is another thing. May need to get a official motor club to make the contact so more chance of them being listened to or in the case of Escorts, an owners club of some description.
Exactly right, approach your local motor clubs and get them to petition the Speed Events committee. If enough people do that then something will be done. now is the time for action as the whole of the Hillclimb & Sprinting section of the Blue Book is under review.

Steve Wilkinson is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Aug 2008, 12:02 (Ref:2263732)   #56
FBF25T
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Chatham
Posts: 16
FBF25T should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think the theory is your club takes it to the area association, who take it to the MSA comittee. I would suggest writing to the chairman of the speed committe as a way to get started. Having read more of the DMN regs they seem a lot clearer on several aspects.

I only do a few sprints, usually to get points for BTRDA allrounders champ, and therefore look at myself as an outsider to the sport.

I think there should be some way where a rally car could run without resorting to sports libre, i.e. Mk2s with 5 links and Vauxhaul motors [under 2 litre?] for example, as that would get more people doing the odd event, and is cheaper than the alternative 2litre BDA! I don't see a problem really with 2.4 litre Escorts as long as they run in my class and not under 2 litre! But as I read it no over 2litre escort can be run, despite the fact ath several were in Central Southern a couple of years ago.
FBF25T is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Aug 2008, 12:14 (Ref:2263737)   #57
b1ackcr0w
Veteran
 
b1ackcr0w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location:
Yorkshire's cultural Attache to Somerset
Posts: 3,750
b1ackcr0w is going for a new world record!b1ackcr0w is going for a new world record!b1ackcr0w is going for a new world record!b1ackcr0w is going for a new world record!b1ackcr0w is going for a new world record!b1ackcr0w is going for a new world record!b1ackcr0w is going for a new world record!
Looking in Motorsport Now! The wording of those rules are out for consultation as we speak. Put up a good case and you might have some joy.
b1ackcr0w is offline  
__________________
I want a hat with "I only wanted one comb" written on it.
Quote
Old 5 Aug 2008, 12:23 (Ref:2263743)   #58
FBF25T
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Chatham
Posts: 16
FBF25T should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I haven't taken mine out the wrapper yet!
FBF25T is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Aug 2008, 16:37 (Ref:2263907)   #59
Copperbottom
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 775
Copperbottom has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
What about 5 links??
Copperbottom is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Aug 2008, 17:48 (Ref:2264652)   #60
Bunman
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Guernsey
Channel Islands
Posts: 49
Bunman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
As I said before


Mod prod blocks have to have been available in the host vehicle at some point. Or a manufacturers specified option. i.e an "exchange unit" etc. "205 blocks" for example are ok for an Escort as they were what you would get if you went into Ford for a re-con or exchange engine in mid-late 80's
As were "AX crossflow" blocks etc. They were the "Manufacturers specified option"

205 blocks were just a later version of the 20 block. NOT specifically a "Cosworth" block although they were used in the first 3dr Cosworths.
You could have had a 205 block in a late Capri or a Transit van.
And as an exchange short engine if you blew up your pinto powered vehicle.

Hope this helps
Bunman is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Aug 2008, 14:53 (Ref:2265338)   #61
FBF25T
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Chatham
Posts: 16
FBF25T should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunman
As I said before


Mod prod blocks have to have been available in the host vehicle at some point. Or a manufacturers specified option. i.e an "exchange unit" etc. "205 blocks" for example are ok for an Escort as they were what you would get if you went into Ford for a re-con or exchange engine in mid-late 80's
As were "AX crossflow" blocks etc. They were the "Manufacturers specified option"

205 blocks were just a later version of the 20 block. NOT specifically a "Cosworth" block although they were used in the first 3dr Cosworths.
You could have had a 205 block in a late Capri or a Transit van.
And as an exchange short engine if you blew up your pinto powered vehicle.

Hope this helps
An interesting hypothosis [if that is the right word!] I can see no sensible reason to not allow a 205 block in a pinto engined escort [or come to that in historic rallying, although it is specifically banned for that]. I certainly would never protest one.
FBF25T is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Production engines in P1 JAG Sportscar & GT Racing 19 17 Jun 2008 08:12
LMP1 indipendants to run GT1 6.0 V12 production engines? knighty Sportscar & GT Racing 80 11 Apr 2008 18:46
BARC CTCRC Toyo modified production classic thunder saloon car championship big andy National & Club Racing 57 29 Sep 2006 13:54


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.