Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 May 2003, 21:32 (Ref:600320)   #1
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Single Engine

A while back Brock Yates suggested for cart that they have one engine but have manufactures. This would mean you would have a similar set up like this year and manufactures would be able to badge their name on the engine. This seems like a neat idea-it would have much lower costs and could perhaps encourage more manufactures to enter the series since they wouldn't have to spend huge sums of money on the development programs they would have if they had different engines for each comapny. What do you think?
Edmonton is offline  
Old 15 May 2003, 21:49 (Ref:600348)   #2
evo
Veteran
 
evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
Medicine Hat
Posts: 693
evo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Never happen. Manufacturers like to have control over thier own destiny when they enter a series and if they all had the same engine it's a total **** shoot.
evo is offline  
__________________
When asked facetiously if he knew he’d ruined a good story line by beating Patrick, Wheldon responded bluntly, “Don’t care one bit.”
Old 15 May 2003, 21:52 (Ref:600351)   #3
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by evo
Never happen. Manufacturers like to have control over thier own destiny when they enter a series and if they all had the same engine it's a total **** shoot.
Honda and Toyota may like it because they could possibly pick and choose their teams-something cart never really allowed them to do.
Edmonton is offline  
Old 15 May 2003, 22:50 (Ref:600390)   #4
Emfa
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Australia
Colorado Springs
Posts: 732
Emfa should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Single Engine

Quote:
Originally posted by Edmonton
A while back Brock Yates suggested for cart that they have one engine but have manufactures. ...
I presume you mean "one engine but have different manufactures"? I don't get it. What would be the point? Whose design would they be supposed to use? What would the manufacturers be expected to get out of it? :confused:
Emfa is offline  
Old 15 May 2003, 23:38 (Ref:600403)   #5
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Damn, what the hell was Brock smoking when he came up with that one?

Last edited by Lee Janotta; 15 May 2003 at 23:39.
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Old 16 May 2003, 01:31 (Ref:600445)   #6
brightline
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
United States
Temple Terrace, FL
Posts: 390
brightline should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Although I don't like the idea I believe the point was to continue to have Ford(for example) keep producing the Cosworth engine but badge some as Ford, some as Jaguar, some as Lincoln, some as Mazda,etc. That would make sense I guess, It's kind of like the Nascar boys arguing which engine is better the Chevy or the Pontiac.

Last edited by brightline; 16 May 2003 at 01:32.
brightline is offline  
Old 16 May 2003, 02:21 (Ref:600465)   #7
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Very stupid. Everyone would know that the engines were the same and it would provide none of the reasons companies get involved in racing.

It would be different if each manufacturer had a "starter" engine that they could only change in certain ways. For instance the 3.0L V6 Ford put in the Taurus is also in the Mazda 6S and Lincolns, not to mention the Aston Martin 6L V12 started it's design life as two of those V6s. Mazda's engine is a lot different than Ford's, but uses the same block.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 17 May 2003, 07:12 (Ref:601601)   #8
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The manufacturers wouldn't go for it.

If one manufacturer picked what turned out to be a dud team, they wouldn't be able to do a thing about it. Also, how could the manufacturer who's team was dominating advertise that they had anything to do with helping them win?
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Old 17 May 2003, 08:22 (Ref:601623)   #9
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
One thing I wouldn't mind is to see Ford badge a few of the engines as their other brands, for eg Mazda, Volvo, Jaguar etc, but I know this won't happen for many reasons (and as a huge Blue Oval fan, I quite like the current prospect of Ford winning every race )

Imagine PT winning a race in a Volvo powered car...hehe
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single engine supply proposed for 2004 mortda Formula One 18 6 Jan 2003 19:11
The single best car from a single race! Legend Formula One 1 29 Jul 2002 22:49
Toyota Single Turbo engine win! Robin Plummer ChampCar World Series 2 1 Aug 2000 16:10


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.