|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Jul 2004, 04:01 (Ref:1047284) | #1 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Off topic for a second, but does anyone really think Kimi was going to make life hard for Michael?
|
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
26 Jul 2004, 04:14 (Ref:1047290) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 511
|
Not in the long run...
But he was the best chance last night. It would have been interesting to see Kimi vs Button David. Last edited by DKGandBH; 26 Jul 2004 at 04:15. |
||
__________________
Look at my web page... |
26 Jul 2004, 07:25 (Ref:1047363) | #3 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Jul 2004, 07:30 (Ref:1047365) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,477
|
Quote:
|
||
|
26 Jul 2004, 07:37 (Ref:1047370) | #5 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Split thread as I did'nt want to hijack the other topic.
Personally, I think it was Silverstone all over again. It looked closer than it really was. |
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
26 Jul 2004, 07:39 (Ref:1047373) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
I was VERY disapointed when Kimi went off... But only because it would give some hope to fans thinking... "what if" Given it would have been a close race... Michael would have won no matter what IMO.
|
||
__________________
Local Track: Aldo Scribante What sort of motorist are you... Smooth or Hairy I'm definitely hairy. |
26 Jul 2004, 07:43 (Ref:1047377) | #7 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,570
|
Very disappointed? I was gutted. I really believe Kimi could have given Michael a race.
So thank the Lord for Jenson, eh? |
||
__________________
44 days... |
26 Jul 2004, 07:44 (Ref:1047378) | #8 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Jul 2004, 07:51 (Ref:1047386) | #9 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,303
|
Frankly no.
It was Silverstone all over again and as we saw the pit stops weren't going to go in his favour. |
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
26 Jul 2004, 07:56 (Ref:1047390) | #10 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,598
|
After the first stops I thought Kimi might have had more fuel on board. At Michael's pitstop he seemed to stay still for a couple of seconds with the fuel hose disconnected, but his overall stop time was similar to Kimi's. Maybe Kimi could have gone a lap or two longer in that stint and get in a few fast laps while Michael's new Bridgestone's were coming up to temperature?
I think it would have been a lot closer than Silverstone (in real terms). Although I think Michael would have probably come out on top, but it wasn't a clear cut thing... |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
26 Jul 2004, 08:14 (Ref:1047407) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,508
|
Whilee it is hard to say as it's pure speculation i think that he most was certainly in with a chance.
|
||
|
26 Jul 2004, 10:26 (Ref:1047532) | #12 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
he had a chance .. that's for sure
|
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
26 Jul 2004, 10:32 (Ref:1047536) | #13 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Isn't it great that we've reached a point where there's a car/driver combination we can speculate about like this, rather than just seeing Michael drive off into the distance?
Roll on Hungary. |
|
|
26 Jul 2004, 10:35 (Ref:1047546) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,338
|
Yes.
|
||
__________________
Let it be |
26 Jul 2004, 10:46 (Ref:1047562) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,540
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Jul 2004, 10:51 (Ref:1047568) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,550
|
He seemed to have more fuel on board than Michael, and wasn't slippng away at a massive rate. That segment of the race might've been his only chance to get in front, but I think he could've challenged, although it's Michael who always does the fast laps when they're needed.
|
|
__________________
"Stacy's mom has got it going on, she's all I want, and I've waited so long. Stacy can't you see, you're just not the girl for me, I know it might be wrong but I'm in love with Stacy's mom" |
26 Jul 2004, 10:55 (Ref:1047571) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,900
|
Probably not. But he would have been second, and quite close to Micheal as well. He did set the fastest lap after all.
|
||
__________________
I can't drive 55. |
26 Jul 2004, 13:00 (Ref:1047712) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,120
|
Hmmmm, I'm confused. People are saying/agreeing that Kimi seemed to have more fuel on board, he had the fastest lap and still believe Michael would have won?? I strongly believe he would have won. Kimi was driving agressively and the car was handling well. He did the fastest lap in clear air and had a great chance to leap frog at the next stop. BUT, we shall never know.
Silverstone can't be compared to this race. MS on a two stopper with more fuel and was able to hold off the McLaren on a three stopper indicating to me that the Ferrari was real fast. This race was different imho. When Kimi's wing blew off, I watched him chuck his steering wheel into the car (I thought they get fined for not re-attaching the wheel) and flail his arms a bit and that was it for me. I turned it off and went for a boat ride to blow off some steam. It wasn't hard to figure out what the outcome was going to be. |
||
|
26 Jul 2004, 13:05 (Ref:1047721) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,299
|
Ifs and buts...
Whatif Button had started 3rd? Whatif Monty hadn't such a bad start? Whatif Michael had had the accident at Indy and not Ralf? Maybe Kimi could've given Michael a run for his money - the two of them would've been slower and Button would've come into the mix, but it's all conjecture. |
|
|
26 Jul 2004, 13:18 (Ref:1047736) | #20 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,570
|
But at least we're able to have a small amount of conjecture - even if TGF did win yet again, there is some vague prospect of competition for him......
|
||
__________________
44 days... |
26 Jul 2004, 13:45 (Ref:1047778) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
True Ayse. It was such a letdown to see Kimi go out, because he could've made for an exciting race. On the other hand, it could've easily petered out and been another redwash - at least the mystery and intrigue of the debate remains alive.
The best chance of Michael losing again this year could be versus Renault in Hungary, although this was definately a near-miss. |
||
|
26 Jul 2004, 13:48 (Ref:1047781) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,299
|
Renault were expecting to be strong at the Nurburgring - I don't think things are going exactly their way this season...
My hopes are on BAR providing us with a little light entertainment at the Hungarian GP. |
|
|
26 Jul 2004, 13:50 (Ref:1047782) | #23 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
The McLaren package was very good round the twisty sections of Silverstone and likewise seemed solid at Hockenheim.
I'd still expect this to be the case in Hungary and would imagine that Kimi rather than Renault will be the closest contenders to Schumacher in Budapest. |
|
|
26 Jul 2004, 15:54 (Ref:1047892) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
At their first stops, Michael didn't seem to take on as much fuel as Kimi, dispite being stationary for the same amount of time. (iirc, Michael was held up by another car coming in?)
This could have bode well for the race. Michal finished only 10 seconds ahead of Jenson, obviously Michael had the luxurary of being able to take it easy, had Kimi stayed in the race it proberbly would have been a different matter for Michael in the closing stages of the race, who knows. My question woud be, would Michael still have won had Jenson started in 3rd place? 5 laps extra fuel and 0.3 seconds down on the pole time, incredible pace from Jenson and the BAR. |
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
26 Jul 2004, 15:58 (Ref:1047893) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
Hockenheim showed that the other teams ar getting closer to Ferrari, imo, Michael may struggle to win all remaining races of the season, and (again imo) Hungary isn't the only place that the others could get a "sniff" of a victory. |
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another Kimi-Ferrari rumour: TGF's seat is Kimi, or Ferrari pays $5million (merged) | Dixie Flatline | Formula One | 88 | 3 May 2006 21:17 |
Kimi ?!?!? | Speed | Formula One | 13 | 7 Mar 2004 17:45 |
Well done Kimi and JPM | Damon | Formula One | 20 | 29 Jul 2002 09:08 |
DC v Kimi | av8rirl | Formula One | 26 | 28 Feb 2002 19:29 |
DC vs KIMI | Raoul Duke | Formula One | 25 | 28 Jan 2002 19:52 |