|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
18 Aug 2020, 18:23 (Ref:3996279)
|
#10 | ||
|
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 243
 |
If I was Stefan Ratel I would keep as far away from anything the ACO are doing as possible!
I know some people criticise Ratel and SRO for all sorts of things - BOP, SC use etc etc ....... but I have to take my hat off to him. To consistently have the size of grids in Europe over the last five years that they have, just proves that they are doing something right. The old adage of 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' springs to mind here! GT3 just works, so please do not change it - evolve it yes, but don't change the basic format. The conversations with Bentley last year proved a point - 'We don't want a 'works team' really, but if you support 'customer' teams like Audi and Lambo do then BOP might be a bit more favourable ........ Stefan - don't touch the ACO with a barge pole! |
||
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re-introduction of multi-class GT structure in ACO-style racing? | Deleted | ACO Regulated Series | 49 | 21 Apr 2014 16:46 |
| [FIA GT] FIA/ACO GT regulations | ger80 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 4 | 14 Jul 2006 23:23 |
| [FIA GT] why did the FIA kill the GT1 class in FIA GT? | CVT | Sportscar & GT Racing | 42 | 16 Nov 2003 01:48 |
| Seqential Tranny in ACO GT class? | RacingManiac | ACO Regulated Series | 12 | 4 Jul 2003 02:27 |
Threaded Mode