 |
|
20 Dec 2007, 14:37 (Ref:2092691)
|
#1
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,770
|
2008 ACO Technical Regulations
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 14:44 (Ref:2092694)
|
#2
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
engine wording is interesting - certainly adds fire to the Aston Martin LMP1 rumours
|
|
__________________
Chase the horizon
|
20 Dec 2007, 14:54 (Ref:2092700)
|
#3
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Appendix C is noteable too, particularly for spectators - maybe the ACO can actually get the position indicators to work this year?
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 15:01 (Ref:2092705)
|
#4
|
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,014
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNewBob
Appendix C is noteable too, particularly for spectators - maybe the ACO can actually get the position indicators to work this year?
|
It's a great idea in concept, but by ten hours only half of them work anyway.
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 15:13 (Ref:2092708)
|
#5
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,956
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss_collins
engine wording is interesting - certainly adds fire to the Aston Martin LMP1 rumours
|
Semi stressed engine, homologated in LMGT1 and used in
a production car built in a quantity of at least 1000 units per
year.
Do they sell 1000 units per year of any particular production car?
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 15:17 (Ref:2092714)
|
#6
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
I'd be staggered if they didn't according to wikirubbish they do 5,000 DB9s per year
|
|
__________________
Chase the horizon
|
20 Dec 2007, 15:20 (Ref:2092716)
|
#7
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,956
|
Ok, just didn't know, thanks for the correction.
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 15:23 (Ref:2092720)
|
#8
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,956
|
LMP2 :• 80 litres maximum on board
So, as per expected, down from 90 litres.
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 15:36 (Ref:2092732)
|
#9
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
I think its a shame they have nobbled the P2's so much (but thats another thread)
|
|
__________________
Chase the horizon
|
20 Dec 2007, 15:44 (Ref:2092744)
|
#10
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss_collins
engine wording is interesting - certainly adds fire to the Aston Martin LMP1 rumours
|
....and GM.
As I stated in another thread, Aston have said they'd like to use the V12, but would need performance breaks.
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 15:51 (Ref:2092752)
|
#11
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
LMP2 can use a homologated diesel engine with 4400 cc displacement. The strange thing is that LMP2 diesels can also use a 80 liter tank. If they applied the same logic as in LMP1, the fuel tank should be 72 liter instead.
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 16:01 (Ref:2092764)
|
#12
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 70
|
The LMP2 diesel regulations are interesting in that they allow two-stage turbocharging, particularly as Peugeot have a 2.2-litre inline-4 twin-turbo diesel engine in production. WR diesel for 2009?
|
|
|
20 Dec 2007, 16:07 (Ref:2092772)
|
#13
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogelhund
Semi stressed engine, homologated in LMGT1 and used in
a production car built in a quantity of at least 1000 units per
year.
Do they sell 1000 units per year of any particular production car?
|
Corvette does with the LS7
|
|
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
|
20 Dec 2007, 16:08 (Ref:2092774)
|
#14
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
So I assume that Zytek, Courage/ORECA, Lola etc. are all going to be in P2 this year, since P1 is "réservé plus particulièrement aux constructeurs." Correct?
|
|
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?
-Bill James
|
20 Dec 2007, 16:13 (Ref:2092776)
|
#15
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,956
|
I was asking more regarding Astons productions than the Vette, but thanks.
This homologated engine business in LMP2, both Normally Aspirated and Diesel strikes me as odd. So they are encouraging the use of manufacturers engines in the category, but they don't want manufacturers in the category. A bit of mixed signals there really. 4.4 l Diesel... BMW, Ford, any others?
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|