|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
11 Jun 2007, 17:47 (Ref:1934218) | #1 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 11,001
|
I've done it - I've cancelled Autosport
Quote:
Got to be honest and say I can't see any likelihood of me doing that again this time. Which is sad as I've been buying it every week for nearly 20 years and I have every single issue sold going back to the late sixties. I, like many other long-term subscribers, have just found the magazine drifting away from what I want to read. F1 is just not interesting to me. It used to be, sure, but not these days I'm afraid. Filling 2/3 of the magazine with F1 just ain't gonna interest the fans of the sport - they want to read about all classes of racing. Everything that's not F1 seems to be an afterthought and hidden away as if they're embarassed by lowering themselves by printing a report from a FFord race or whatever. This week's lack of Le Mans Supplement was the final nail in the coffin as far as I was concerned. What possible use is a 'PREVIEW' when the majority of people are going to be at the track already? I'm sorry, but that is just a way of boosting sales by forcing subscribers to buy an additional copy trackside. Ridiculous. How about everyone else who is a long term reader? Do you still subscribe? Have you cancelled? What do you think about modern-day Autosport? |
||
|
11 Jun 2007, 21:54 (Ref:1934438) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,592
|
Quote:
On the other hand 75,000 people buy Evo. That's more than Autosport, Motorsport and Motorsport News put together. |
||
|
11 Jun 2007, 22:51 (Ref:1934479) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 126
|
This is a very timely post ...and one which I ironically spotted whilst on the autosport "My Page" of headlines!!
I subscribed to Autosport in January at the show and was lured to be honest by the free gift of a signed Aston martin LeMans car which incidentally fetched £45 on ebay!! I'm on th edoorstep of cancelling my subscription as I'm just not interested in a magazine of F1 and Rallying... not to mention Nascar! I figured it'd be a lot more balanced than it is so I'm sorry to say it, but I'll be cancelling my subscription pretty shortly (assuming I'm not in a 12 month contact or something daft!). I don't want to, but I just can't justify the cost vs the content.... F1 is done to death on the web for free! And I have the last 3 weeks issues sat in their wrappers still...that's how interested I am! |
||
|
11 Jun 2007, 23:07 (Ref:1934489) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,843
|
After many years.I bit the bullet and cancelled last December - after spending more money with Haymarket than I would like to add up.
I now sneak a look at the newsagents, but 30 seconds is enough to see that their club racing coverage hasn't improved and very little else in there interests me. |
||
|
12 Jun 2007, 00:34 (Ref:1934522) | #5 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,454
|
Heading towards it. I attended the most amazing Shelsley meeting - one of the best day's motorsport I've ever been to and they gave it under half a page while another F1 borathon got half a magazine. Not many years ago there would have been a proper news story.
Increasingly I find that when the next magazine arrives I'm not half way through the last one. I don't think it will be long before I finally give up. This week's Hamilton extravaganza (I like the guy, and what a driver, but please - give us a break) might just push me over the edge. |
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
12 Jun 2007, 08:06 (Ref:1934741) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,936
|
Considering there is F1 Racing for F1 articles and so on, it does seem strange that Autosport is just crammed full of F1 stuff. I'm not a subscriber, never will be, just thought I would say that.
All I do is read anything that looks interesting when in the shop. It's not worth 3 quid. |
|
|
12 Jun 2007, 08:15 (Ref:1934747) | #7 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,934
|
I'm really agonising over this Craig. I know its no longer the magazine for me - I knew that throughout the Schuey 'idolatry' years but having had a subscription for so long (and having bought it regularly before that) it still seems a hell of a wrench. It just disappoints me enormously to have reached this point - so unnecessarily in my opinion. But then so much gets sacrificed these days on the altar of the great God - F1, doesn't it? Nothing much else really seems to matter to the publishers - after all, they're only real concern is to sell copy.
My missus has been telling me to cancel my subscription for several years, as I rarely read the mag for more than 10 minutes these days.... For me though, the phenomenally crass decision to delay the Le Mans Guide this year is pretty much a clincher. Just an unbelievable snoot being cocked to the Le Mans fans...... So yes, I'll be sending the same email, probably later today. With a twinge of sadness. |
||
__________________
280 days...... |
12 Jun 2007, 08:17 (Ref:1934750) | #8 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
i've had a subscription to autosport for 10 years now, and to be honest, it's good bogside reading - half interested idle amusement. in the time i've been subscribed, the internet has vastly increased in usefulness. most of the coverage i'm interested in is replicated online somewhere.
having said that, i think i'll stay subscribed for a while yet. the full content of the magazine isn't available online, so until then the paper copy still fulfils a function. |
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
12 Jun 2007, 08:26 (Ref:1934759) | #9 | |||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,934
|
Quote:
Is that so? I hadn't realised the circulation was so small. I couldn't even find a copy of Motorsport News in my town yesterday. But then they have closed 2 of the 4 newsagents in the last few years - the rise and rise of the dreaded coffee shop......... |
|||
__________________
280 days...... |
12 Jun 2007, 08:30 (Ref:1934764) | #10 | |||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,934
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
280 days...... |
12 Jun 2007, 08:32 (Ref:1934768) | #11 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 51
|
Dear all,
I'm sorry that many of you feel this way. The team here works unbelieveably hard (yesterday we all pulled a 16-hour shift and we were in at 7am this morning), to try to make a modern magazine that is still relevant at a time when the internet makes news delivery instantaneous. The counter this, we have revamped the way we tackle news, adding more analysis than straight reportage. You will not find this anywhere else on the internet. There is a definite misconception of our F1 bias. F1 will always be the cover - as I've explained before, nothing else sells. It would be commercial suicide to ignore this. However, inside the magazine F1 rarely gets more than 25 per cent of the coverage, and usually around 10/15 per cent. There is no other magazine that covers WRC, BTCC, WTCC, DTM, British F3, Euro F3, GP2, Wolrd Series, ALMS, LMS, FIA GT, Champ Car, IRL, BRC and national racing such as British GT, Formula Renault, Formula BMW, Palmer Audi, Britcar etc etc, to the level we do. FACT. There is more racing that ever at the moment and I have a finite number of pages in which to cover it all. If you have any constructive comments on how we can do this better, I'd love to hear them. But to bash us for being F1-centric is mis-guided and just plain incorrect. Best, Andrew van de Burgt Editor, Autosport |
|
|
12 Jun 2007, 08:41 (Ref:1934776) | #12 | |||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,934
|
Quote:
But let's face it - pick up an issue from the 80s or early 90s and I'm sure you can see what the sportscar fans are on about. You admit it yourself - you're gonna feature what sells mags - and I don't blame you for that - Autosport isn't a charity, after all, but when you put financial viability at the top of the publication considerations, you're bound to upset some sections of the motorsport loving public. I guess we can be pleased that you're coming here and listening and responding to our criticism. I still maintain the decision to delay the Le Mans guide was unforgiveable. Absolutely 100%, utterly and completely unforgiveable. That's my opinion and the majority of your readership may disagree with me. That's life. |
|||
__________________
280 days...... |
12 Jun 2007, 08:52 (Ref:1934786) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,592
|
Quote:
Top Gear 190,000 Auto Express 86,000 Evo 75,000 Car 73,000 Max Power 67,000 Autocar 58,000 Fast Car 52,000 F1 Racing 45,000 Redline 37,000 Autosport 32,000 MN 23,000 Motorsport 18,000 |
||
|
12 Jun 2007, 08:56 (Ref:1934789) | #14 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 51
|
In the 1980s and 1990s Group C had factory entries from Porsche, Mercedes, Jaguar, Toyota, Nissan and some very strong privateer entries. In the 2000s, it's had Audi. At least Peugeot have joined the party this year.
When the quality of the field matches the Group C era, so will the coverage. Le Mans still gets a 12-page report, however. The decision on the issue date of the supplement has not gone down well. I admit that. I'm confident this will be taken into consideration for next year. |
|
|
12 Jun 2007, 09:17 (Ref:1934819) | #15 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 51
|
This is like comparing apples with oranges. Autosport is weekly, Evo monthly. On that basis we sell 128,000 a month. Almost twice Evo's sales.
|
|
|
12 Jun 2007, 09:31 (Ref:1934834) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Just picking up the 24 May edition to use as an example.
Lets review the contents: Front Cover = 5 stories - ALL F1, surely the Indy 500 preview was worthy of making the front cover in some description? Your editorial, again about F1, and again just on pure speculation about F1 using green fuels Followed by 8 whole pages of F1 news! And then the waste of space that is "The Week In Pictures". Would be far better to replace that with news articles. F1 got more news pages than everything else put together! Moving on from the news, onto the two editorial sections, and guess what? Both on Formula 1, as usual. Running total upto at least 10 pages of F1 out of 24 "proper" pages so far! Then a four page F1 feature, and a further two pages on someone you bill as "a future world champion" Four page preview on Indy?! One of the biggest races of the year! Where's the indepth review of the qualification process? Then 6 pages on WRC, which for the most part nobody really seems to care about any more. The report focuses only on the front runners and there's little mention of any one other than the WRC runners. Then just 14 pages on all of the international motorsport events. Thats less than the length of the Monaco GP report! Which even your writer said there was nothing to report on!! The Club Racing section is one of the better bits, as generally its the only section of the magazine Lewis Hamilton & F1 don't appear in now. Moving onto the May 31 addition, its absolutely UNFORGIVEABLE to have the Lewis Hamilton tabloid sensationalism as the headline rather than the Scottish winner of the Indy 500. Why not reverse the pictures? Rather than having a loser on the front cover? I was even more shocked to see the Lewis Hamilton thing was Top Story rather than Dario's win! Not until Page 16 is Dario even mentioned! Another 14 page GP report on a race where there were 0 genuine overtaking moves in what must rank as one of the most boring races ever. Indy on the otherhand, gets only 4 pages! 4! How about cut the F1 coverage in 1/2 and increase coverage of everything else? Or even better, drop F1 altogether and let F1 Racing become a weekly whilst Autosport concentrates on proper motor racing? |
||
|
12 Jun 2007, 09:33 (Ref:1934837) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,592
|
Quote:
|
||
|
12 Jun 2007, 10:37 (Ref:1934886) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
TBH I don't like the covers generally, far too fussy. My faves are the late 1980s ones with the white borders.
|
||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
12 Jun 2007, 10:39 (Ref:1934888) | #19 | |||||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
I've already declared my interest in the Le Mans Supplement thread, so I'm not about to repeat it. However, I think that Andrew VdeB's response and clarification is an admirable defence and explanation. Whether we like it or not, to remain commercially viable, I think that, very sadly, Autosport is unable to make true motor racing fans their main sales target. On top of that, they are also competing against the 'instant' news availability provided by the internet. It must be having a substantial impact on sales, although, I personally, still like to be able to sit down and read the printed word on a page rather than have my face in a PC the whole time. Of course, I'd like to see a rebalancing of the content with rather less F1 and more on GT/sports cars and club racing, but I guess that Haymarket know best where their greatest sales potential lies. In respect of club racing we know what happened to the last publication, 'In Gear', that tried to address the interest in grass roots motor racing, even though it was only a monthly.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now to those of you discussing circulation figures, can you explain to me why you are comparing apple with oranges? (Edit - NB you will note that this is a long post and I was typing this out before I read Andrew's and subsequent posts, but I'm leaving it in, since I still think it valid- JT). What has the circulation of EVO (which I also read incidentally!) got to do with any of the motor racing magazines, especially when two of the latter are weeklies? There are many more people interested in the their road cars than have more than a passing interest in motor racing, so it is hardly a surprise that EVO outsells them. In fact, the only racing mag above Autosport on that list is F1 Racing, another monthly, and also a Haymarket publication, and that rather gives support to Autosports view that they need to target primarily F1. It's a sad fact of life but it's a commercial decision that necessarily requires it to target the LCD in the motor racing world, the F1 fans, many of whom have absolutely no interest in motor racing per se, unlike most of those who post on here. Last edited by John Turner; 20 Jun 2007 at 19:32. |
|||||
|
12 Jun 2007, 10:42 (Ref:1934895) | #20 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Jun 2007, 11:12 (Ref:1934921) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
I may be cancelling my subscription soon, mainly as I don't have time to read it and when I do have time I can't really be bothered! I seem to have got through only a small part before the next one arrives.
I do agree that it has become a bit sensationalist, but that's the way most mainstream mags seem to have gone. When I first started buying in the late 60's it devoted a lot of space to club racing. Now it's just a few pages at the back. I'd rather see more local stuff than the odd saloon race in South America or Scandinavia which is of no interest to me whatsoever. I take both Autosport and Motorsport. Both have good editorial staff who obviously love their sport. Motorsport is good as I'm of an age where it's content appeals to me. Perhaps I'm just getting to old for Autosport! |
||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
12 Jun 2007, 12:01 (Ref:1934974) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,968
|
I'm not sure how you can improve what used to be known as Club Autosport other than by:
- allocating more space - varying the features a little bit more... and allocating more space to them. I suspect sports car fans would like more space for their interests, as would American racing fans, as would rally fans, and so on. Sadly, space is finite (yes, you could make the magazine twice as thick, but costs would spiral and sales (magazine and advertising space) wouldn't). Autosport can only ever offer a broad-brush approach these days, and naturally F1 gets the biggest swipe. It is the pinnacle. Special interest groups (club racing fans, sports car fans, rally fans, etc) have to be served by other media - magazines, websites or whatever. Sadly, there just isn't enough interest to publish in any kind of viable format in these sectors. |
||
|
12 Jun 2007, 12:43 (Ref:1935016) | #23 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Exactly, Ian, disappointing though it is!
|
||
|
12 Jun 2007, 12:56 (Ref:1935026) | #24 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,454
|
Let's look at this slightly differently for my 'constructive' bit (and I do appreciate the editor coming on here to ask - well done.
When I first bought the magazine in the early 80s I watched F1 on tv. As a result of buying the magazine I learned about all sorts of other branches of the sport. As a result of the coverage of ETCC and a good preview I attended my first race meeting at Donington - ETCC in 83, I think, and then went to Silverstone for GrpC later in the year. This was because the magazine educated me and gave me information on other stuff in a way that made me want to see it. Where I think the magazine lets us down now is that it doesn't do that enough. Fair enough, F1 on the cover sells issues, and a reasonable amount of coverage of it is to be expected (and Roebuck is still essential reading for me), but there's not enough similar in depth coverage of everything else to attract the F1 fans to the rest of what the sport can offer. |
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
12 Jun 2007, 14:23 (Ref:1935090) | #25 | ||||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,934
|
Quote:
Hmmm. Shame the coverage of F1 didn't reduce likewise when the standard of the racing deteriorated. Whatever we say isn't going to change your mind. That's perfectly clear from the quote. In fact, I'll challenge Autosport to abide by that rationale if and when our chosen arm of the sport does match the Group C era. I still wager that it will never even begin to challenge the ever-glossier coverage of F1. Quote:
Stone me! I should bally well hope so..... Last edited by Aysedasi; 12 Jun 2007 at 14:25. |
||||
__________________
280 days...... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SUNBAC Cancelled | Chris Griffin | National & Club Racing | 3 | 15 Jan 2005 08:12 |
Snetterton cancelled | Rod Birley | Marshals Forum | 8 | 11 Nov 2004 18:58 |
French Grand Prix cancelled! / will it stay cancelled? (merged) | TuscanR | Formula One | 53 | 24 Nov 2003 09:26 |
ISC Cancelled | AndyF | National & Club Racing | 7 | 8 Jul 2001 18:10 |