|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
24 Oct 2007, 22:12 (Ref:2050686) | #1 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Fia Gt 2010
sorry if this is found elsewhere but its not on DSC so I thought Y'all mightn't have noticed this under all the F1 stuff
WMSC decision Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
24 Oct 2007, 23:55 (Ref:2050752) | #2 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 240
|
19 October, on DSC:
Stephane Ratel Talks To DSC – Part 1 A Wholesale Revision To The GT Regulations Package ACO And SRO/FIA Now In Harmony The Avon Equalisation Test at Donington Park yesterday gave DSC an opportunity to catch up with Stephane Ratel, on progress with the move to revise GT regulations for 2009 and beyond. The initial proposals had caused major waves throughout the sport as a) most manufacturers did not support them, and b) neither, it seemed, did the ACO. Initial fears that the proposed package, based on a ‘Super GT3’ theory for a new GT1 formula, would be forced through, now appear unfounded and instead an entirely revised proposal will be submitted for discussion and approval to the FIA World Council later this month, with full approval hoped for by December. So what are the major changes Stephane? “From the very first proposal our priority was to have commonality with the ACO and we have that now. “We will retain the same basic structure, GT1, GT2, GT3, but instead of being based on the GT3 regulations we will now base GT1 on the current GT2 regulations, but with some sensible differences. “In GT1, the two major differences from the current cars will be in weight and engine. The very expensive parts of the current GT1 formula are in weight reduction and in working the cars to deal with engine restrictors. The new package will allow less weight reduction but will run with unrestricted engines, which should be much closer to the production specification, albeit with some sensible modifications for reliability. “For example – a roadgoing Lamborghini Murcielago weighs about 1600kg and produces 640 bhp. For the car to be competitive for the current GT1 regulations the car has to have around 500kgs taken out of it, which is very expensive. “However the cars also have to run with engine restrictors, perhaps giving the cars 500-550 bhp and the teams and manufacturers have to spend a lot of time and money getting the best performance and reliability from the engines in that specification. “Our new proposal means that they will have to spend far less money on weight reduction, perhaps allowing the cars to run at 1250kg, but that we will leave the cars unrestricted with the power output they were designed for, say 600bhp or so. So slightly heavier, but more powerful cars.” The revised proposal comes on the back of a move from the major manufacturers to table a new structure, with just a single GT class (based around the current GT2 spec), a proposal which was categorically rejected by SRO. “We want to see the new Ferrari 599, the Aston Martin DBS and others come into GT1 racing and this formula would allow that to happen,” said Ratel. “Our proposal is that the current cars would run in 2008 and 2009 with the new specification cars starting to run in a transitional year in 2009." So, for now, forget almost everything you've read about GT3-based proposals. |
|
|
25 Oct 2007, 00:11 (Ref:2050758) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
|||
|
25 Oct 2007, 08:17 (Ref:2050902) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
my bad! though now it is official
|
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
25 Oct 2007, 14:41 (Ref:2051154) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Slight more wt but unrestricted engines? Yahhooooo.
come on 800 - 900 bhp. 600 bhp cars will be left in the paddock crying. |
||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
25 Oct 2007, 14:54 (Ref:2051166) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Engines will be no more than 650bhp, maybe 700bhp if the road car is particularly heavy.
They'll be closer to stock rather than current race engines. |
|
|
26 Oct 2007, 03:16 (Ref:2051644) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 908
|
Ilike FIA GT as it is now, with GT1 and GT2 running together, with the Spa 24 Hours the highlight of the season with some G2 and LMS teams, but th foolish idea from Ratel to create a "World GT1 Championship" is simply crazy, the FIA GT must be European series, and has nothing to do with the 2 Americas and Asia !
|
||
|
26 Oct 2007, 04:38 (Ref:2051669) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Oct 2007, 07:12 (Ref:2051719) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 656
|
How many road cars produce 800-900 bhp?
Surely the regs will be written so that modifications to the base engine will be purely in the name of racing longevity? The whole idea of the new regs is to keep the costs down and allow more manufacturers and teams to compete? Yes, I'm sure, a few simple mods to a 500-600bhp road engine could release 100bhp, but I can't see 900 bhp full race engines being allowed, besides they'd be faster than a LMP1 in a straight line! When he states "unrestricted" I think he means that there will be no air restrictors used. |
||
|
26 Oct 2007, 08:31 (Ref:2051767) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 402
|
Yup. I was thinking that too. Not to mention slower through the corners (compared to existing GT1s). That could make it very tough for the P2s in particular on the twistier circuits. I suppose the extra weight would blunt the acceleration and braking though.
|
||
|
26 Oct 2007, 10:28 (Ref:2051866) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,954
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Fred Mackowiecki- the one man I'd love to swap surnames (and talent) with. |
26 Oct 2007, 11:56 (Ref:2051934) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 656
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Oct 2007, 13:35 (Ref:2052005) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,954
|
As in...what?
only shocked. So whaaaa...(missing t) my apologies... |
||
__________________
Fred Mackowiecki- the one man I'd love to swap surnames (and talent) with. |
26 Oct 2007, 13:55 (Ref:2052025) | #14 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 135
|
In regards to the power and weight proposals:
Quote:
|
||
|
26 Oct 2007, 15:04 (Ref:2052066) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
For starters, look at the LMS Interlagos entries. Way down on usual seasonal entries, and FIA GT's own forays into more 'unknown' areas of motorsport haven't exactly been successful with brimming grids, have they? Grids in the far east of about 20-24 cars, with some of those being G2 and G3 entries to boost the numbers. |
|||
|
26 Oct 2007, 16:48 (Ref:2052156) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
Unless the engine is going to come straight out of a street car, and used as is, it is impossible to build, i.e. even blueprint, an engine and somehow magically make it produce the contrived amount of horse power, without some strict restrictions applied. Maybe they will just apply the GARRA format for controlling horse power, which is no better than the GT1 restrictions applied now. |
|||
|
26 Oct 2007, 19:19 (Ref:2052281) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Seems like GT4 next year won't necessarily take place within FIA GT weekends, indeed the 2008 calendar, according to DSC, has the last round taking place within the BGT/F3 finale at Donington in October... might be a nice lil' race day, that!
|
||
|
26 Oct 2007, 20:41 (Ref:2052346) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
|
||
|
27 Oct 2007, 11:25 (Ref:2052583) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,790
|
Now that's more like it!
I am with Bob, with the way engines spend several 24 hour sessions on the dyno, if you really believe somebody is "only" going to have 650bhp@1300kg is delusional. Try much, much closer to 750bhp especially if those durability parts are added to make it live longer at higher and extended RPM which will allow for much more power. This does however open the door for BMW as they wanted concessions for the 6 series and Nissan who's production engine for the GT-R does fall in that 5.0-5.5 gap (well below that) and they'll be restricted in turbo inlet size I can assure you but still make "650hp"@1300kg quite EASY. GT2 will be pretty much untouched, they'll loose some electronics (I am sure this is the ACO's idea) and gain some weight as well, but with current tire technology and with as much time as the cars spend in the wind tunnel these days, whatever they lost in electronics they'll pick up in mechanical and aero grip. So what you'll see pretty much is the same level of racing and the cars might be slightly cheaper but overall budgets to be competitive shall remain the same... Basically no REAL changes just shifting of priorities.. |
||
|
27 Oct 2007, 13:31 (Ref:2052652) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
I wouldn't get particularly excited about any "details" involved in these discussions. I imagine any real ruleset is quite some ways from being finalized, and it appears to me as though there is a power struggle between SR and the four big manufacturers. I wonder to what degree these big 4 will assert their power.
|
||
|
27 Oct 2007, 13:58 (Ref:2052662) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
I think a NASCAR road race car, ( Watkins Glen & Sonoma type car) 3700 lbs and 800 bhp will do the trick. Unrestricted ( 358 ci with one carberator) the car will hit will over 200 mph on long straights. May not stop worth anything, no handle well, but it sure will fly on long straights. |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
28 Oct 2007, 12:42 (Ref:2053222) | #22 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,773
|
So the whole car's will be closer to 'stock' not just the engines right?
So judging by current available models what sort of hardware will people fancy runnin in GT1? BMW M6? (or is that GT2?) Aston DBS Ferrari 599 Mercedes, err what's that massive limo/oil tanker coupe thing they've launched with a 15 litre engine...? Lambo something or other that replaces our favourite Murcialago? Corvette Dodge Viper (or Challenger perhaps??? GT2 911 430 and/or 8C (although that'll be out of production by then?) Or have I missed the class engine distinctions here? |
||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
28 Oct 2007, 15:03 (Ref:2053320) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,954
|
Ferrari 612 or 599? I reckon 599.
DBS yes, Viper yes, Corvette yes, perhaps GT1 8c, Maser Granturismo, mc merc slr perhaps, the new mclaren car?, audi r8 (probably private, but a likely proposition), lotus europa gt2?, koenigsegg maybe, murcielago LP640 maybe, or the crazy angular thing (Reventon http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIA...Reventon1.JPG), but that is a murcielago anyway. and anything else new in the near future... |
||
__________________
Fred Mackowiecki- the one man I'd love to swap surnames (and talent) with. |
28 Oct 2007, 16:52 (Ref:2053402) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
Not the info we saw a year ago with the test 599 GTC was slower then the prodrive developed 550s and even Ferrari's own 575? But new info this past year? |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
28 Oct 2007, 17:42 (Ref:2053443) | #25 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
No soup for you! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[FIA GT] why did the FIA kill the GT1 class in FIA GT? | CVT | Sportscar & GT Racing | 42 | 16 Nov 2003 01:48 |
[FIA GT] Boycott FIA GT/FIA SCC Races | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 6 | 17 Oct 2002 17:56 |