|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
8 May 2006, 19:05 (Ref:1603608)
|
#1 | ||
|
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 441
 |
Yes, I'd say the 100-400, would be a very good lens to have trackside. The L glass is very highly rated and the IS is supposed to be a help as well especially with slower shutter speeds.
It might be a bit limiting in the paddock/pits though and you would end up stepping back a heck of a lot to get your subject in frame and possibly end up getting run over. But I've learnt that I can acheive fairly reasonable quality in the pits with cheap n nasty lens. Take a peep at this http://www.f1-jimages.co.uk/2006/des...6/img_9122.jpg taken with 18-55 that comes in kits with canon bodies. |
||
|
|
|
8 May 2006, 19:18 (Ref:1603625)
|
#2 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,786
|
Ok then James. I think you've convinced me! I'm gonna drop into Jesosps tomorrow and check up on the body and how that feels. Should be able to get everything under budget then! Hurrah!
 JB |
||
|
|
__________________
SnappyRacers Motorsport Photography -------------------------------------------------------
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for advice !? | dougs | Motorsport Art & Photography | 1 | 16 Jun 2005 19:09 |
| [RC Racing] RC Advice | Griffin | Armchair Enthusiast | 12 | 2 Nov 2001 14:54 |
Hybrid Mode
